21.09.2015 Views

The Journal of Research ANGRAU

Contents of 36(1) - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

Contents of 36(1) - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SELVIYA and REDDY<br />

Table 2 Teaching styles adopted by the home science teachers<br />

S. No. Teaching Style UG classes PG classes<br />

F % F %<br />

1. Expert style 13 40.62 14 43.75<br />

2. Formal authority style 08 25.00 07 21.87<br />

3. Facilitator style 05 15.63 05 15.63<br />

4. Personal model style 04 12.50 04 12.50<br />

5. Delegator style 02 6.25 02 6.25<br />

Total 32 100.00 32 100.00<br />

An examination <strong>of</strong> results in table 3 indicated that 78.13 per cent <strong>of</strong> the teachers had<br />

adopted high expert style <strong>of</strong> teaching and 21.87 per cent the moderate expert style in dealing<br />

UG classes. Similarly, 75.00 per cent <strong>of</strong> the teachers had followed high expert style <strong>of</strong> teaching<br />

and 25.00 per cent had moderate expert style in dealing PG classes.<br />

Nearly sixty per cent (59.37%) teachers had followed moderate formal authority style<br />

and 37.50 had high and low (03.13%) formal authority style in dealing UG classes. Similarly,<br />

59.37 per cent <strong>of</strong> the teachers had adopted moderate formal authority style and 37.50 had<br />

high and low (03.13%) formal authority style in dealing PG classes.<br />

Equal per cent (50.00%) <strong>of</strong> the teachers had adopted high and moderate <strong>of</strong> personal<br />

model style in dealing PG classes. Similarly, 53.13 per cent <strong>of</strong> the teachers had high personal<br />

model style and 46.87 per cent had moderate personal model style in dealing UG classes.<br />

Around fifty four per cent (53.13%) <strong>of</strong> the teachers had adopted moderate facilitator<br />

style and high (43.74%) and low (03.13%) facilitator style in dealing UG classes. Similarly,<br />

53.13 per cent <strong>of</strong> the teachers had followed moderate facilitator style followed by high (43.74%)<br />

and low (03.13%) facilitator styles in dealing PG classes.<br />

Three fourth (75.00%) <strong>of</strong> the teachers had adopted moderate delegator style followed<br />

by high (15.62%) and low (09.38%) delegator styles in dealing UG classes. Similarly, 78.13<br />

per cent <strong>of</strong> the teachers had followed moderate delegator style followed by high (15.62 %) and<br />

low (06.25%) delegator styles in dealing PG classes.<br />

It is inferred that forty three per cent <strong>of</strong> the teachers had expert style followed by<br />

formal authority style, facilitator style, personal model style and delegator style. <strong>The</strong> probable<br />

reason for this might be that the expert style might have the mastery <strong>of</strong> the subject, high<br />

qualification, experience, large class size, course content and heavy work load and the facilitator<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!