FINANCIAL
Financial report 2005/2006 (PDF) - Vision Australia
Financial report 2005/2006 (PDF) - Vision Australia
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NOTES TO THE <strong>FINANCIAL</strong> STATEMENTS<br />
FOR THE <strong>FINANCIAL</strong> YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006<br />
Note 29: Impacts of the adoption of Australian equivalents to<br />
International Financial Reporting Standards (continued)<br />
service leave provision was classified as non-current. Under A-IFRS, all long service<br />
leave that an employee is entitled to be paid should they cease their employment<br />
with Vision Australia this classified as current, with remaining long service leave<br />
provision classified as non-current.<br />
Note 30: Prior Period Adjustment<br />
At merger date (July 2004) Vision Australia brought its land and buildings to account at<br />
fair value. These values were determined by valuations undertaken by independent<br />
valuers contracted by the individual merging agencies.<br />
In early 2006 the Vision Australia Board engaged property advisors, Ernst & Young to<br />
assist with a review of property. Ernst & Young’s task was to recommend the best use for<br />
a selected number of Vision Australia’s properties. Interim reports produced by Ernst &<br />
Young indicated current values may not match the amounts recorded at merger date.<br />
Acting on this information the Vision Australia Board engaged a firm of independent<br />
valuers, Charter Keck Cramer (CKC) to review the fair value of Land and Buildings as at<br />
June 2004, 2005 and 2006.<br />
Whilst the total value of land and buildings as determined by CKC varies by only 4%<br />
from the values as at merger date, there are significant differences in values for certain<br />
properties, and for both land and buildings at the same property as at merger date.<br />
Vision Australia’s directors believe that the values determined by CKC more truly reflect<br />
the fair values of both land and buildings at merger date. This is based upon more<br />
substantial documentation provided by CKC, validated by Ernst & Young in a number of<br />
instances. Consequently the Board resolved to adopt the value of land and buildings as<br />
at merger date as calculated by CKC. The effect of this change is summarised in the<br />
table below.<br />
Consolidated<br />
Company<br />
Effect of Prior Period 2005 2005 2005 2005<br />
Adjustment $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000<br />
Before After Before After<br />
Restatement Restatement Restatement Restatement<br />
Depreciation and amortisation: 3,268 2,997 2,885 2,614<br />
Contribution arising from 168,678 172,750 145,080 149,153<br />
scheme of arrangement<br />
Property, plant and equipment/ 104,943 109,287 103,506 107,850<br />
Investment property<br />
Retained Surplus 164,076 168,420 134,957 139,301<br />
48 Vision Australia Financial Report 2005/2006