28.09.2015 Views

Minutes of the 45 - IPR » International Planning & Research

Minutes of the 45 - IPR » International Planning & Research

Minutes of the 45 - IPR » International Planning & Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>45</strong> th meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Computer Market Analysis Group (CMAG)<br />

The forty-fifth meeting <strong>of</strong> CMAG was hosted by Autodesk at <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>of</strong>fices in San<br />

Francisco, California on August 26-27, 2010. The <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meeting was Better MI<br />

through Web/Business/Customer Analytics.<br />

CMAG members attending <strong>the</strong> meeting included:<br />

Mary Ellen Bercik, Cisco<br />

Scott Carter, Adobe<br />

Pras Chaudhuri, ex-HP<br />

Jeff Coldani, Symantec<br />

Carol Galvin, IBM<br />

Richard Gee, ex-HP<br />

Jimmy Gonzales, HP<br />

Deanna Graham, GRI<br />

Jocelyn Graham, Allenport<br />

Kevin Hill, Autodesk<br />

Brent Johnson, <strong>IPR</strong><br />

Satya Jyotiprakash, IBM<br />

Cuneyt Kayali, NetApp<br />

Theresa Kushner, Cisco<br />

Jack Lamey, Epson America<br />

Martin Lee, CSC<br />

Alan Lee, Autodesk<br />

Sanjeev Madan, HP<br />

Kevin Mann, IBM<br />

Julie McEntee, Adobe<br />

Stephanie Morrison, NetApp<br />

Nathan Nuttall, AMD<br />

Regina Ramos, NetApp<br />

George Reed, HP<br />

Shawn Reeves, Cisco<br />

Pia Rieppo, Cisco<br />

Michael Robertson, AMD<br />

Hector Sandoval, Seagate<br />

Doug Schwegman, CyberSource<br />

Yvonne Shu, Autodesk<br />

Jim Slevin, AMD<br />

Giselle Stancic, Cisco<br />

Elaine Stern, Symantec<br />

Arsineh Vartanian, Seagate<br />

Susan Walker, Adobe<br />

Jeff Young, <strong>IPR</strong><br />

The following participants signed up for remote access:<br />

Stig Berg, VMware<br />

Rebecca Burr, Xilinx<br />

Beth Chappell, HP<br />

Andrea Horton, Adobe<br />

Maia Pindar, Palo Alto <strong>Research</strong> Center<br />

Keren Solomon, Intuit<br />

Daniel Torok, HP<br />

Jennifer Wang, Cisco WebEx<br />

Robin Yarmovsky, ex-Sun<br />

Speakers making presentations during <strong>the</strong> meeting included:<br />

Matt Belkin, Adobe<br />

Alison Shaffer, Cisco WebEx<br />

Shashi Upadhyay, Lattice Engines<br />

Susan Etlinger, Altimeter Group<br />

Dan Neely, Networked Insights<br />

Swati Saxena, HP<br />

Thursday, August 26<br />

Alan Lee welcomed attendees to Autodesk and provided an overview <strong>of</strong> Autodesk’s<br />

Marketing Intelligence and Operations team, and Jack Androvich, Senior Director <strong>of</strong><br />

Marketing Intelligence and Operations at Autodesk kicked <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> <strong>45</strong> th meeting <strong>of</strong> CMAG<br />

with an overview <strong>of</strong> data and analytics at Autodesk. He was followed by Julie McEntee<br />

<strong>of</strong> Adobe, who introduced <strong>the</strong> day’s first speaker, Susan Etlinger <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Altimeter<br />

Group. Susan’s presentation was entitled “Future Shock: Market Intelligence in <strong>the</strong><br />

Social Organization”. During her session, Susan demonstrated <strong>the</strong> extent to which web


CMAG <strong>45</strong> at Autodesk in San Francisco August 26-27, 2010<br />

activity has shifted away from domains and towards social media sites, and provided<br />

illustrations <strong>of</strong> ways in which companies are using social media interactions to enhance<br />

customer relationships. She <strong>the</strong>n described <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> market research in this process.<br />

After a short break, Satya Jyotiprakash <strong>of</strong> IBM <strong>the</strong>n followed with <strong>the</strong> meeting’s first<br />

“War Story”. His session was entitled “Human Reader Messaging Analysis: A Case<br />

Study”. He led <strong>of</strong>f by describing a methodology for competitive messaging analysis<br />

used by IBM’s Market Insights group, which involved extraction and classification <strong>of</strong><br />

messages available through sources such as analyst reports, whitepapers/brochures,<br />

industry websites, Factiva, company websites, and a simple Google search; <strong>the</strong> topic <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> messaging analysis was cloud computing, and messages were collected for IBM<br />

and for several <strong>of</strong> its competitors. Satya <strong>the</strong>n outlined <strong>the</strong> applications <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong><br />

analysis, and <strong>the</strong> actions taken by IBM as a result <strong>of</strong> its findings. He wrapped up by<br />

leading <strong>the</strong> group in a practice exercise, in which CMAG members extracted and<br />

classified messages ga<strong>the</strong>red via a Google search relating to restaurants in San<br />

Francisco.<br />

CMAG members <strong>the</strong>n introduced <strong>the</strong>mselves to <strong>the</strong> group. As part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir introductions,<br />

members were asked to describe what makes <strong>the</strong>m happy. Members derive joy from a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> sources, such as playing chamber music, driving, a classic hot fudge sundae,<br />

and a movie with a bag <strong>of</strong> popcorn; several CMAG members indicated that a victory by<br />

<strong>the</strong> San Francisco Giants brought <strong>the</strong>m happinesss; alas, <strong>the</strong> Giants had lost <strong>the</strong><br />

previous day.<br />

After lunch, Jeff Young <strong>of</strong> <strong>IPR</strong> led <strong>the</strong> first discussion <strong>of</strong> CMAG business. During this<br />

session, members brainstormed on possible <strong>the</strong>mes for <strong>the</strong> next meeting. Suggested<br />

topics included:<br />

1. Insights and funding; organizational structure and skill sets: what does a manager need? Building an MI<br />

practice (Kevin Mann, Pia Rieppo); orient all this around a specific initiative (Kevin Mann)<br />

a. How to get to insights? What are <strong>the</strong> skill sets, methods, etc. needed to do this? (Susan Walker,<br />

Julie McEntee, Stacey Taylor)<br />

b. Funding models, centralization/decentralization <strong>of</strong> organization, MI operating models/structure,<br />

employee (as trusted advisor) retention in MI, career paths (Cindy Alfieri, Barbara Imbert);<br />

organizational benchmarks (Jim Slevin, Jimmy Gonzales); benchmarking for headcount planning.<br />

c. Packaging and communicating market intelligence for maximum impact; repurposing and<br />

leveraging, in a format that is digestible and actionable. (Doug Schwegman). Each company<br />

could bring a graphic/effective example <strong>of</strong> what did/didn’t work (Kevin Mann)<br />

d. Send <strong>the</strong> group a questionnaire on MI structure and budget ahead <strong>of</strong> time (Jimmy Gonzales, Jim<br />

Slevin)<br />

2. Competitive intelligence: How much and what do you need to know about your competitors? What’s <strong>the</strong><br />

best way to research competitors? What can <strong>the</strong>y find out about you in <strong>the</strong><br />

process? Privacy/security/legal issues with CI (Lori Deaton, Cindy Alfieri, Robin Yarmovsky, Arsy Vartanian,<br />

Daniela Bayer, Nathan Nuttall).<br />

3. Innovative MI techniques<br />

a. How, when, and why to adopt innovative techniques to drive MI;<br />

disrupting/bypassing/leapfrogging/breaking away from best practices (this crosses<br />

horizontally). How MI results relate to <strong>the</strong> big picture, i.e. <strong>the</strong> “so what?” question. (Inga


CMAG <strong>45</strong> at Autodesk in San Francisco August 26-27, 2010<br />

Vailionis, Jocelyn Graham); Different/non-linear analysis, disruptive analysis, surveys via<br />

handheld devices (Jocelyn Graham)<br />

b. How to mine social media for data and insights - search engines, social networks, blogs, etc.<br />

(Robin Yarmovsky); what is <strong>the</strong> social media landscape around your products and services and<br />

what should your company do about it (Kevin Mann)<br />

c. Brainwaves and advertising techniques, neuromarketing and how to apply it (Theresa Kushner)<br />

d. Look outside IT for best practices. Panel? (Paul Logue, Nathan Nuttall, Doug Schwegman);<br />

bloggers and o<strong>the</strong>r voices/new influencers (Susan Walker, Theresa Kushner) as opposed to<br />

tradtional syndicated sources.<br />

4. MI in new/difficult markets<br />

a. <strong>International</strong> markets (Theresa Kushner)<br />

b. <strong>Research</strong> into small business markets (Elaine Stern)<br />

c. Mobile (Kevin Mann)<br />

Nathan Nuttall <strong>of</strong> AMD <strong>the</strong>n led <strong>the</strong> group on a brainstorming session on CMAG’s<br />

recruiting strategy. The group agreed that a renewed focus in this area – targeting both<br />

current members who have become “dormant” as well as new companies from<br />

emerging sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IT industry – would be worthwhile. One attendee suggested<br />

that we ask each CMAG member to identify contacts who <strong>the</strong>y feel would make a<br />

meaningful contribution to <strong>the</strong> group. A CMAG recruiting committee will be formed to<br />

develop and implement a recruiting strategy.<br />

Julie McEntee introduced <strong>the</strong> afternoon’s first speaker, Matt Belkin <strong>of</strong> Adobe’s Omniture<br />

business unit. Matt’s session was entitled “Making <strong>the</strong> Leap from Traditional Market<br />

<strong>Research</strong> to Marketing Analytics”. Matt described four steps on <strong>the</strong> path to “analytics<br />

enlightenment” – key business requirements (KBRs), which need to be clearly defined;<br />

key performance indicators (KPIs), which measure performance against <strong>the</strong> KBRs;<br />

performance analysis – Matt provided several examples; and an objective, data-driven<br />

approach to optimizing ROI, for which he provided a case study.<br />

After a short break, Satya Jyotiprakash presented "The IBM Global Market Insights<br />

Story: View from Bangalore". During his talk, Satya provided an overview as to how<br />

IBM has structured its Global Market Insights team and has operationalized its global<br />

delivery model. He described <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Global Market Insights group and its<br />

role within <strong>the</strong> marketing organization. He wrapped up with an overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IBM<br />

Market Insights Global Delivery Center, describing its evolution over time, its<br />

engagement model, and <strong>the</strong> factors that have led to its success.<br />

Alison Shaffer <strong>of</strong> Cisco WebEx delivered <strong>the</strong> day’s second War Story, entitled “Using<br />

Data Strategy and Customer Analytics to Drive Business Decisions”. She described <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> a data framework to optimize processes involving collection, usage and<br />

delivery <strong>of</strong> data; and effective methods for increasing data usability. Alison <strong>the</strong>n<br />

provided an example <strong>of</strong> a methodology for identifying adoption levels in Enterprise<br />

segment, and wrapped up with an overview <strong>of</strong> learnings/best practices.<br />

Carol Galvin <strong>of</strong> IBM led <strong>the</strong> day’s final session, entitled “Banter: Looking at Customer<br />

Conversations and Market Insights in Social Media”. Carol led <strong>of</strong>f with an overview <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> social media marketing and monitoring process, and its importance to <strong>the</strong><br />

organization; she <strong>the</strong>n provided an overview <strong>of</strong> Banter, a tool developed by IBM


CMAG <strong>45</strong> at Autodesk in San Francisco August 26-27, 2010<br />

<strong>Research</strong> that delivers social media analytics by identifying relevant blog “universes”<br />

based on authority and influence, and uses this information to identify emerging topics<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest. She concluded with examples which illustrated how Banter can be used to<br />

identify influencers, monitor <strong>the</strong> social media conversations, and alert management to<br />

changes in market dynamics.<br />

After <strong>the</strong> meeting concluded for <strong>the</strong> day, attendees adjourned to Chaya Brasserie in<br />

San Francisco, where <strong>IPR</strong> hosted <strong>the</strong> group at a relaxing and convivial reception and<br />

dinner on Thursday evening.<br />

Friday, August 27<br />

The first speaker <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second day was Dan Neely <strong>of</strong> Networked Insights; he was<br />

introduced by Jeff Young. Dan’s session was entitled “Social Media Analytics:<br />

Customer Feedback or Consumer Intelligence?”. During his session, Dan described<br />

how customer conversations vary for different product areas, and <strong>the</strong> distinction<br />

between analytics (marketing) vs. monitoring (PR). He described case studies involving<br />

campaign strategy and campaign measurement, which can be used to realize insights<br />

that drive strategy and innovation. He wrapped up with three real world examples that<br />

demonstrated <strong>the</strong> ROI from social media listening.<br />

Jeff Young <strong>the</strong>n led <strong>the</strong> second discussion <strong>of</strong> CMAG business. After reviewing <strong>the</strong><br />

suggestions from <strong>the</strong> previous day, <strong>the</strong> group narrowed down <strong>the</strong> roster <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

agenda <strong>the</strong>mes through two rounds <strong>of</strong> voting. After a first round <strong>of</strong> voting, <strong>the</strong> first and<br />

third topics from <strong>the</strong> previous day survived for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration. In <strong>the</strong> second<br />

round <strong>of</strong> voting, <strong>the</strong> third topic (tentatively dubbed “Innovative MI Techniques”) received<br />

a clear majority and will be <strong>the</strong> agenda <strong>the</strong>me for CMAG 46, which AMD has graciously<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered to host at <strong>the</strong>ir Sunnyvale facilities in March <strong>of</strong> 2011. Scott Carter and Julie<br />

McEntee/Adobe, Jocelyn Graham/Allenport, George Reed/HP, Yvonne Shu/Autodesk,<br />

Jim Slevin/AMD and Jeff Young/<strong>IPR</strong> agreed to be on <strong>the</strong> agenda committee. In addition,<br />

Deanna Graham/GRI, Jocelyn Graham/Allenport, Nathan Nuttall and Jim Slevin/AMD,<br />

Hector Sandoval and Arsy Vartanian/Seagate, Susan Walker/Adobe, and Brent<br />

Johnson and Jeff Young/<strong>IPR</strong> agreed to serve on <strong>the</strong> newly-formed CMAG recruiting<br />

committee.<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>r CMAG business, <strong>the</strong> group discussed whe<strong>the</strong>r CMAG’s current moniker –<br />

which some see as computer-centric - is limiting <strong>the</strong> group’s ability to expand its<br />

footprint to emerging industry sectors, and whe<strong>the</strong>r a name change might facilitate this<br />

expansion. One suggestion involved changing “CMAG” to “TMAG” – Technology<br />

Market Analysis Group; while ano<strong>the</strong>r suggestion would maintain <strong>the</strong> CMAG name but<br />

with a rebranding to “Customer and Market Analysis Group”. Feedback from <strong>the</strong><br />

broader CMAG membership will be solicited before a decision is made. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

suggestions involved <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> “special interest groups” involving a subset <strong>of</strong><br />

CMAG members who would explore more narrowly-defined common interests (<strong>the</strong>se<br />

groups could convene ei<strong>the</strong>r immediately preceding <strong>the</strong> CMAG meeting, during <strong>the</strong><br />

meeting – perhaps in breakout sessions after lunch <strong>the</strong> first day; or outside <strong>of</strong> CMAG<br />

meetings); and a benchmarking survey that would enable CMAG members to see how<br />

<strong>the</strong>y stand relative to <strong>the</strong>ir peers in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir company’s MI operations. Finally,


CMAG <strong>45</strong> at Autodesk in San Francisco August 26-27, 2010<br />

announcements were made about two webinars which may be <strong>of</strong> interest to CMAG<br />

members. The first one involves several CMAG members (Kevin Hill, Theresa Kushner,<br />

Stig Berg), who will be participating as panelists in a MOCCA (Marketing Operations<br />

Cross-Company Alliance) webinar related to building a business analytics team; <strong>the</strong><br />

second involves a survey conducted by Grail <strong>Research</strong> – a presenter at CMAG 44 –<br />

that was conducted exclusively on mobile devices. More details on <strong>the</strong>se will be<br />

forthcoming.<br />

After a short break, Swati Saxena <strong>of</strong> HP delivered <strong>the</strong> meeting’s final War Story. Her<br />

session was entitled “<strong>Research</strong> and Analytics: An SMB Case Study at HP”. Swati’s<br />

case study covered <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> a business problem and associated objectives;<br />

an analytical approach to addressing this problem (which included scope determination,<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> available data, development <strong>of</strong> an analytical process, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> market<br />

and behavioral analysis, data cleaning and mining, identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “sweet spot”<br />

opportunity, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> primary research, and <strong>the</strong> inductive process used to organize <strong>the</strong><br />

findings); leveraging <strong>the</strong> insights gleaned from <strong>the</strong> analysis to recommend action; and<br />

<strong>the</strong> challenges associated with this process.<br />

Shashi Upadhyay <strong>of</strong> Lattice Engines led <strong>the</strong> meeting’s final session, which was entitled<br />

“Using <strong>the</strong> Cloud to Predict Purchases”. He was introduced by Pras Chaudhuri. In<br />

contrast to <strong>the</strong> “funnel view” that typically drives <strong>the</strong> sales rep’s perspective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />

and which frames sales and marketing efforts in <strong>the</strong> B2B space, Shashi described <strong>the</strong><br />

greater complexity and uncertainty associated with customer behavior today, and <strong>the</strong><br />

opportunities that can be realized by targeting high-spending but unpredictable<br />

accounts, which represent a small number <strong>of</strong> accounts but which generate most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

growth in <strong>the</strong> market opportunity. To identify and target <strong>the</strong>se accounts, he described<br />

an approach that goes beyond standard firmographics and leverages real-time data<br />

from social media to develop predictive models <strong>of</strong> customer behavior.<br />

Several CMAG members stayed on after lunch for a guided tour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Autodesk Gallery,<br />

led by John Losito <strong>of</strong> Autodesk, who served as a docent.<br />

Feedback on <strong>the</strong> speakers was generally positive, though one attendee felt that <strong>the</strong><br />

Networked Insights presenter was light on data and leaned a bit too heavily towards<br />

selling his service. One attendee applauded <strong>the</strong> “real world” case studies, though<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r found <strong>the</strong> case studies from outside <strong>of</strong> IT to be less helpful. One attendee<br />

particularly liked <strong>the</strong> “Beware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HiPPO” slide from Matt Belkin’s presentation.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r one singled out Satya Jyotiprakash’s “view from Bangalore” for praise.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r suggestions related to <strong>the</strong> remote participation experience. One remote attendee<br />

suggested that presenters repeat any comments and/or questions from <strong>the</strong> audience<br />

that are not directed into a microphone. One in-person attendee commented that <strong>the</strong><br />

loud audio signals when remote participants enter or leave <strong>the</strong> meeting cause a slight<br />

disturbance, and that volume modulation would help here.<br />

Many thanks to Alan Lee, Kevin Hill and <strong>the</strong>ir associates at Autodesk for all <strong>the</strong>ir efforts<br />

which helped to make <strong>45</strong> th meeting <strong>of</strong> CMAG such an enjoyable and memorable<br />

experience!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!