04.10.2015 Views

DEPARTMENTOFDEFENSE LAW OFWARMANUAL JUNE2015

Law-of-War-Manual-June-2015

Law-of-War-Manual-June-2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

applied. 65 The limited and unreliable nature of information available during war also is<br />

recognized in the law of war’s standards for how persons are to assess information. 66<br />

1.5 “WAR” AS A LEGAL CONCEPT<br />

“War” is sometimes used as a legal concept, i.e., the application or operation of a legal<br />

rule may depend on the existence of a “war,” “armed conflict,” or “hostilities.” As a legal<br />

concept, “war” has traditionally been viewed as a condition in which a State is prosecuting its<br />

rights by military force, usually against another State. However, the precise definition of “war”<br />

often depends on the specific legal context in which it is used.<br />

1.5.1 Traditional Conception of War Under International Law. As international law<br />

began to regulate “war,” “hostilities,” and “armed conflict,” it became necessary to determine<br />

what “war” is for the purpose of triggering those legal obligations. 67<br />

As a legal concept, war has usually been described as a condition or state that applies<br />

more broadly than only the mere employment of force or the mere commission of acts of<br />

violence. 68<br />

When treated as a legal concept, “war” has been associated with a State’s use of force to<br />

vindicate its rights (principally, its inherent right of self-defense) under international law. 69<br />

65 Refer to § 2.2.3 (Applying Military Necessity).<br />

66 Refer to § 5.4 (Assessing Information Under the Law of War).<br />

67 See, e.g., Arnold D. McNair, The Legal Meaning of War, and the Relation of War to Reprisals, 11 TRANSACTIONS<br />

OF THE GROTIUS SOCIETY 29, 30 (1925) (“There exist many treaties and other international conventions under which<br />

important obligations arise upon the occurrence of a state of ‘war,’ and as regards which, therefore, either because<br />

the term ‘war’ or some other term connoting war, such as ‘neutrality,’ is used, it becomes essential to know whether<br />

or not a state of war exists at a given point of time. Thus most of the Hague Conventions only come into operation<br />

once a state of war has arisen—for instance, those relating to the Laws and Customs of War on Land, to the Rights<br />

and Duties of Neutrals in Land and Maritime War respectively, to the Bombardment of Ports, Towns and Villages<br />

by Naval Forces, and to the Status of Enemy Merchant Ships at the Outbreak of Hostilities.”).<br />

68 1956 FM 27-10 (Change No. 1 1976) 8 (“While it is usually accompanied by the commission of acts of violence,<br />

a state of war may exist prior to or subsequent to the use of force.”); VII MOORE’S DIGEST 153 (“Much confusion<br />

may be avoided by bearing in mind the fact that by the term war is meant not the mere employment of force, but the<br />

existence of the legal condition of things in which rights are or may be prosecuted by force.”); GROTIUS, <strong>LAW</strong> OF<br />

WAR & PEACE 33 (1.1.2.1) (“war is the condition of those contending by force”).<br />

69 SPAIGHT, AIR POWER AND WAR RIGHTS 2 (“War, after all, is only a means to an end. It is a way of settling an<br />

international difference which diplomacy has failed to adjust and which is not susceptible of treatment by the other<br />

means of pacific settlement, such as inquiry commissions, arbitration, or submission to the Permanent Court of The<br />

Hague. When all else fails, there is no way in which a nation can assert its rights save by going to war. War is the<br />

means by which it vindicates a vital right threatened or infringed by the claim or act of another State. Its object is to<br />

cause the other State to desist from the action or abandon the claim which is the cause of offence. In other words, a<br />

war is fought in order to bring about a change of mind in another State.”); The Prize Cases, 67 U.S. 635, 666 (1863)<br />

(“War has been well defined to be, ‘That state in which a nation prosecutes its right by force.’”) (quoting EMERICH<br />

DE VATTEL, DROIT DE GENS (<strong>LAW</strong> OF NATIONS) (1760)); LIEBER CODE art. 30 (“Ever since the formation and<br />

coexistence of modern nations, and ever since wars have become great national wars, war has come to be<br />

acknowledged not to be its own end, but the means to obtain great ends of state, or to consist in defense against<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!