SUSTAINABILITY
15-07-275_Sanctuary_Magazine__FINAL_lowres_
15-07-275_Sanctuary_Magazine__FINAL_lowres_
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FEATURES<br />
50 years of Naval Bird Control Heritage<br />
the possibility that the use of falcons for<br />
keeping birds away from airfields might<br />
stimulate substantial efforts to breed<br />
hawks in captivity and perhaps also<br />
engender a more reasonable attitude to<br />
their survival in the wild state’<br />
The issue of modern aircraf t hit ting<br />
birds especially gulls on take -of f<br />
was exercising the minds of the<br />
RNAS at Lossiemouth.<br />
Petty Offcers Careless and Fraser with their duty peregrine falcons at RNAS Lossiemouth, 1965 – 1972. The first<br />
two naval falconers to be trained under the guidance of Mr Phillip Glasier, a professional falconer © Crown<br />
As we celebrate 40 years of Sanctuary<br />
Magazine we also celebrate 50 years<br />
of a remarkable story that linked<br />
the ancient art of falconry with the<br />
protection of a new technology, that of<br />
the jet engine and the modern era of<br />
nature conservation.<br />
Towards the end of World War II the<br />
jet engine started to become a reality.<br />
By 1965 the relatively slow propeller<br />
driven fighters and bombers had<br />
been replaced by the fast jet. The jet<br />
technology had taken the art of flying<br />
beyond that at which wild birds could<br />
evade modern aircraf t.<br />
He thought there would be an<br />
opportunity to somehow set up a<br />
conservation programme to tackle the<br />
major decline of this species across<br />
the nor thern hemisphere.<br />
Sir Peter Scott, who had also been a<br />
naval offcer, made early contact with<br />
Captain Brown; the RNAS Yeovilton<br />
bird control archive holds many<br />
fascinating details and insights from<br />
their correspondence into the early<br />
infancy of this science.<br />
Sir Peter’s initial letter to Captain Brown<br />
in 1969 included the paragraph: ’We see<br />
Captain Brown wrote in response:<br />
’The Naval Air Station at Lossiemouth<br />
had a particularly large seagull<br />
population because the airfield lies<br />
virtually a few hundred yards from the<br />
coastline and also in this area of low<br />
temperatures the concrete runways<br />
are normally always 4⁰c warmer than<br />
the surrounding natural terrain and so<br />
are attractive as a roosting place. The<br />
birds are then in a position to meet jet<br />
aircraft, whose rapid acceleration and<br />
lack of ahead noise (because they are<br />
taking off into wind) catches the birds<br />
unaware and they rise too late and<br />
find themselves perfect targets for the<br />
enormously powerful vacuum cleaners,<br />
which jet engines virtually are.’<br />
And went on to say ‘Pre-1965 we<br />
averaged four bird strikes a month<br />
(usually on take-of f, but occasionally<br />
on landing) at an average cost of<br />
Many airfields were and remain<br />
attractive habitats for a range of<br />
wildlife and especially birds. In<br />
a modern intensively managed<br />
countryside the low intensity<br />
management of an airfield can provide<br />
a good source of food and relatively<br />
safe area to roost for many species.<br />
As the navy investigated the use<br />
of using birds of prey, especially<br />
peregrine falcons, to scare birds from<br />
the airfield, Sir Peter Scott who was<br />
not only the founder of the now<br />
Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust but<br />
also deeply involved in the wider<br />
international conservation movement<br />
heard about this use of peregrines.<br />
RNAS Yeovilton bird control vehicle and methods © Crown<br />
62<br />
Sanctuary 44 • 2015