21.10.2015 Views

SUSTAINABILITY

15-07-275_Sanctuary_Magazine__FINAL_lowres_

15-07-275_Sanctuary_Magazine__FINAL_lowres_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEATURES<br />

50 years of Naval Bird Control Heritage<br />

the possibility that the use of falcons for<br />

keeping birds away from airfields might<br />

stimulate substantial efforts to breed<br />

hawks in captivity and perhaps also<br />

engender a more reasonable attitude to<br />

their survival in the wild state’<br />

The issue of modern aircraf t hit ting<br />

birds especially gulls on take -of f<br />

was exercising the minds of the<br />

RNAS at Lossiemouth.<br />

Petty Offcers Careless and Fraser with their duty peregrine falcons at RNAS Lossiemouth, 1965 – 1972. The first<br />

two naval falconers to be trained under the guidance of Mr Phillip Glasier, a professional falconer © Crown<br />

As we celebrate 40 years of Sanctuary<br />

Magazine we also celebrate 50 years<br />

of a remarkable story that linked<br />

the ancient art of falconry with the<br />

protection of a new technology, that of<br />

the jet engine and the modern era of<br />

nature conservation.<br />

Towards the end of World War II the<br />

jet engine started to become a reality.<br />

By 1965 the relatively slow propeller<br />

driven fighters and bombers had<br />

been replaced by the fast jet. The jet<br />

technology had taken the art of flying<br />

beyond that at which wild birds could<br />

evade modern aircraf t.<br />

He thought there would be an<br />

opportunity to somehow set up a<br />

conservation programme to tackle the<br />

major decline of this species across<br />

the nor thern hemisphere.<br />

Sir Peter Scott, who had also been a<br />

naval offcer, made early contact with<br />

Captain Brown; the RNAS Yeovilton<br />

bird control archive holds many<br />

fascinating details and insights from<br />

their correspondence into the early<br />

infancy of this science.<br />

Sir Peter’s initial letter to Captain Brown<br />

in 1969 included the paragraph: ’We see<br />

Captain Brown wrote in response:<br />

’The Naval Air Station at Lossiemouth<br />

had a particularly large seagull<br />

population because the airfield lies<br />

virtually a few hundred yards from the<br />

coastline and also in this area of low<br />

temperatures the concrete runways<br />

are normally always 4⁰c warmer than<br />

the surrounding natural terrain and so<br />

are attractive as a roosting place. The<br />

birds are then in a position to meet jet<br />

aircraft, whose rapid acceleration and<br />

lack of ahead noise (because they are<br />

taking off into wind) catches the birds<br />

unaware and they rise too late and<br />

find themselves perfect targets for the<br />

enormously powerful vacuum cleaners,<br />

which jet engines virtually are.’<br />

And went on to say ‘Pre-1965 we<br />

averaged four bird strikes a month<br />

(usually on take-of f, but occasionally<br />

on landing) at an average cost of<br />

Many airfields were and remain<br />

attractive habitats for a range of<br />

wildlife and especially birds. In<br />

a modern intensively managed<br />

countryside the low intensity<br />

management of an airfield can provide<br />

a good source of food and relatively<br />

safe area to roost for many species.<br />

As the navy investigated the use<br />

of using birds of prey, especially<br />

peregrine falcons, to scare birds from<br />

the airfield, Sir Peter Scott who was<br />

not only the founder of the now<br />

Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust but<br />

also deeply involved in the wider<br />

international conservation movement<br />

heard about this use of peregrines.<br />

RNAS Yeovilton bird control vehicle and methods © Crown<br />

62<br />

Sanctuary 44 • 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!