DRAFT
WSPTP_102015
WSPTP_102015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Washington State Public Transportation Plan<br />
Chapter Three: Goals and Action Strategies<br />
ridership demand. Additionally, all transit agencies are limited in the amount of local revenue<br />
they can raise because of the legislatively imposed maximum tax rate of 0.9 percent, and<br />
several are at their maximum. Community Transit, Jefferson Transit, Island Transit, Sound<br />
Transit and King County Metro have all reached their maximum and others, such as Kitsap<br />
Transit and Intercity Transit, are not too far behind in hitting the maximum limit for local<br />
sales tax to go toward public transportation.<br />
Maintenance and preservation of the system requires money. Under the current scenario,<br />
however, funding and revenue projections are not sustainable to meet the needs resulting<br />
from projected growth in population and jobs. For example, the Puget Sound Regional<br />
Council (PSRC) estimates transit ridership will need to double by 2040 to accommodate<br />
population and job growth in the Puget Sound region. There is not funding in place today<br />
to support this increased demand. The same is true in other parts of the state where local<br />
communities want transportation options and have hit the maximum local funding limit,<br />
such as King County Metro and Jefferson Transit. During the 2015 Legislative Session,<br />
Community Transit was able to increase their local option funding limit and has placed a<br />
ballot measure for November 2015 to increase local funding of their transit services. In some<br />
communities, the demand for transportation options has resulted in the creation of new<br />
transit authorities. For example, in November 2013, Okanogan County residents approved<br />
transit options for the Okanogan County Public Transportation Benefit Area.<br />
The state’s interest in delivering a viable public transportation system to its citizens will<br />
be increasingly pivotal to achieving future state goals, providing the capacity, mobility and<br />
access necessary for the effective movement of people and goods essential to a high quality<br />
of life for all Washington state citizens. Washington state’s interest and role as a partner in<br />
the guardianship of the public transportation system can take place in a variety of ways,<br />
from adopting a partner role in coordinating and integrating the planning of transportation<br />
to being an information resource, convener and facilitator, data aggregator, evaluator of<br />
emerging technologies, or as a policy maker, or as a funder.<br />
EVALUATING TRANSPORTATION GUARDIANSHIP<br />
Desired<br />
Outcomes<br />
• Sustainable services and<br />
infrastructure<br />
• Reduce lifecycle cost<br />
• Cost effective<br />
• Improved access<br />
• Public understanding<br />
Measures<br />
Currently Available<br />
• % of highway pavement in<br />
fair or better condition<br />
• % of state bridges rated<br />
structurally deficient<br />
• % of state ferry terminals in<br />
fair or better condition<br />
• Capital project delivery<br />
performance<br />
Measures to<br />
be Developed<br />
• Guardianship Dashboard<br />
»»<br />
Public perception of condition<br />
and needs of local and statewide<br />
transportation systems<br />
»»<br />
Improved system conditions<br />
»»<br />
Funding priorities<br />
86<br />
WSDOT | <strong>DRAFT</strong> October 2015 | WaTransPlan.com