SOUL TIMES ONLINE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
www. soulstopsha.org <strong>SOUL</strong> Times November 2015 8<br />
HOW CAN I HELP?<br />
Why the urgency?<br />
How the SHA Act works:<br />
Before Fletchers can begin work on the planned<br />
subdivision at 545 Ōruarangi Road it needs the<br />
Council to agree to change the Proposed Unitary<br />
Plan. It also needs resource consent for the subdivision.<br />
The SHA Act allows applications for Plan<br />
changes and subdivision consents to be fasttracked<br />
without the usual notification and submission<br />
processes required under the Resource<br />
Management Act 1991.<br />
The land is currently zoned for future development.<br />
In June, Fletchers applied to Auckland<br />
Council for a Plan change to rezone the block<br />
to a combination of Mixed Housing Suburban,<br />
Public Open Space – Conservation, and Green<br />
Infrastructure Corridor. The Auckland Housing<br />
Project Office accepted that application on 25<br />
September 2015.<br />
The Project Office must make a final decision<br />
on the application within 130 working days (or 6<br />
months). First it must give notice of the accepted<br />
plan change to adjacent land owners and infrastructure<br />
provider. This was done on 6 October.<br />
Those notified have until 5 November to make<br />
submissions to the Project Office. Therefore,<br />
<strong>SOUL</strong> encourages you to make a submission.<br />
This Act was developed under budget secrecy<br />
rules with no consultation with affected parties<br />
outside of Government. There is no process for<br />
challenging the creation of a special housing<br />
area. Rights of submission are limited and there<br />
is no appeal to the Environment Court in most<br />
cases (strangely there is only a right of appeal<br />
against a decision of the Project Office if the<br />
development is 4 storeys or higher). Most of the<br />
Resource Management Act does not apply to<br />
SHAs. The whole process is an erosion of democracy.<br />
Let’s make sure the feelings of our community<br />
about this are heard by the decision makers<br />
in the Project Office.<br />
You can also...<br />
1. Send a letter to Fletcher Residential<br />
Fletcher Residential Limited<br />
C/- Harrison Grierson<br />
P.O. Box 276121<br />
Manukau City<br />
Auckland 2022<br />
Attn: Andrew McCarthy a.mccarthy@<br />
harrisongrierson.com<br />
Objections must be in before November 5.<br />
2. Send a letter or e-mail to Hon Dr Nick<br />
Smith, Minister of Building and Housing,<br />
and a copy to your local MP<br />
3. Come to a <strong>SOUL</strong> meeting, held every<br />
Wednesday from 6-7.30pm<br />
4. Sign up to the <strong>SOUL</strong> mailing list: send<br />
your e-mail address to soulvssha@gmail.<br />
com<br />
5. Visit the <strong>SOUL</strong> website and spread the<br />
word! www.soulstopsha.org<br />
6. Like us on Facebook:<br />
www.facebook.com/<strong>SOUL</strong>.noSHA;<br />
or subscribe to our YouTube Channel –<br />
search Save our Unique Landscape at<br />
youtube.com;<br />
or follow us on Twitter: @saveIhumatao<br />
Please sign, cut out the below letter and post to Neil<br />
Birrell at Auckland Council before November 5.<br />
Neil Birrell<br />
Resource Consent Administrator Auckland Council<br />
Private Bag 92300 Victoria Street West Auckland 1142<br />
SpecialHousingArea@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz<br />
Dear Mr Birrell,<br />
I am an Auckland resident and ratepayer writing to you regarding the plans to<br />
build housing at Ihumātao. I feel as the Ōtuataua Stonefields are council owned I<br />
as a ratepayer should be seen as an adjacent landowner. I am not only objecting<br />
to the building of housing on this site but also objecting to the biased, nondemocratic<br />
and massively flawed Special Housing Area legislation. This letter is<br />
to highlight my issues and to ask for SHA62 plans to be scrapped and for the<br />
Special Housing Area legislation to be halted and reviewed.<br />
Below are the reasons I am against Special Housing Area 62:<br />
- I believe that SHA62 will not contribute to making Auckland a liveable city.<br />
- This area is the birth place of Auckland and should be celebrated, not sold off to<br />
the highest bidders.<br />
- Ihumātao is one of the last remaining original and liveable papakainga in<br />
Aotearoa.<br />
- This land was changed from future rural to future urban. This change by<br />
council only benefits offshore businesses and totally disregards the Heritage<br />
Gateway Project.<br />
- SHA62 is too close to waahi tāpu sites and I feel that it is disrespectful to build<br />
here.<br />
- The full archaeological significance of this heritage site is unknown.<br />
- SHA62 will have a negative impact on Ōtuataua Stonefields.<br />
- SHA62 will have a negative impact on the habitat of the rare shorebirds of the<br />
area.<br />
- Natural restoration of the coastal line is finally to the point where local Māori<br />
can collect food again. Increased water runoff and waste water will put this at<br />
risk.<br />
Although I am not against additional housing initiatives in Auckland I do have<br />
concerns about the Special Housing Area process:<br />
- No public consultation is permitted.<br />
- Land once promised to Auckland residents can be changed without public<br />
consultation.<br />
- Auckland residents have no way to object.<br />
- Residents of Ihumātao, many with an ancestral connection to the first settlers,<br />
have no way to object.<br />
- Auckland councillors have highlighted issues with the system. That there is not<br />
enough time dedicated to give proper thought to each individual SHA application<br />
is just one of them.<br />
- Auckland councillors have admitted to mistakes and misinterpretation of the<br />
facts regarding SHA62.<br />
- Auckland Council can be totally vetoed by current government.<br />
- Research by a group called Save Our Unique Landscape has highlighted many<br />
issues with the process.<br />
I understand that this letter does not exactly fit into your SHA process. However,<br />
I am demanding the right, as a concerned Auckland resident, to have my<br />
objections to SHA62 considered. If I am shut out of this formal process, how will<br />
my voice be heard?<br />
I look forward to your respectful reply to all of the points listed above.<br />
Yours faithfully<br />
Name:<br />
Address:<br />
To donate to the <strong>SOUL</strong> campaign go to: https://givealittle.co.nz/cause/soulstopsha62/