29.10.2015 Views

SOUL TIMES ONLINE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

www. soulstopsha.org <strong>SOUL</strong> Times November 2015 8<br />

HOW CAN I HELP?<br />

Why the urgency?<br />

How the SHA Act works:<br />

Before Fletchers can begin work on the planned<br />

subdivision at 545 Ōruarangi Road it needs the<br />

Council to agree to change the Proposed Unitary<br />

Plan. It also needs resource consent for the subdivision.<br />

The SHA Act allows applications for Plan<br />

changes and subdivision consents to be fasttracked<br />

without the usual notification and submission<br />

processes required under the Resource<br />

Management Act 1991.<br />

The land is currently zoned for future development.<br />

In June, Fletchers applied to Auckland<br />

Council for a Plan change to rezone the block<br />

to a combination of Mixed Housing Suburban,<br />

Public Open Space – Conservation, and Green<br />

Infrastructure Corridor. The Auckland Housing<br />

Project Office accepted that application on 25<br />

September 2015.<br />

The Project Office must make a final decision<br />

on the application within 130 working days (or 6<br />

months). First it must give notice of the accepted<br />

plan change to adjacent land owners and infrastructure<br />

provider. This was done on 6 October.<br />

Those notified have until 5 November to make<br />

submissions to the Project Office. Therefore,<br />

<strong>SOUL</strong> encourages you to make a submission.<br />

This Act was developed under budget secrecy<br />

rules with no consultation with affected parties<br />

outside of Government. There is no process for<br />

challenging the creation of a special housing<br />

area. Rights of submission are limited and there<br />

is no appeal to the Environment Court in most<br />

cases (strangely there is only a right of appeal<br />

against a decision of the Project Office if the<br />

development is 4 storeys or higher). Most of the<br />

Resource Management Act does not apply to<br />

SHAs. The whole process is an erosion of democracy.<br />

Let’s make sure the feelings of our community<br />

about this are heard by the decision makers<br />

in the Project Office.<br />

You can also...<br />

1. Send a letter to Fletcher Residential<br />

Fletcher Residential Limited<br />

C/- Harrison Grierson<br />

P.O. Box 276121<br />

Manukau City<br />

Auckland 2022<br />

Attn: Andrew McCarthy a.mccarthy@<br />

harrisongrierson.com<br />

Objections must be in before November 5.<br />

2. Send a letter or e-mail to Hon Dr Nick<br />

Smith, Minister of Building and Housing,<br />

and a copy to your local MP<br />

3. Come to a <strong>SOUL</strong> meeting, held every<br />

Wednesday from 6-7.30pm<br />

4. Sign up to the <strong>SOUL</strong> mailing list: send<br />

your e-mail address to soulvssha@gmail.<br />

com<br />

5. Visit the <strong>SOUL</strong> website and spread the<br />

word! www.soulstopsha.org<br />

6. Like us on Facebook:<br />

www.facebook.com/<strong>SOUL</strong>.noSHA;<br />

or subscribe to our YouTube Channel –<br />

search Save our Unique Landscape at<br />

youtube.com;<br />

or follow us on Twitter: @saveIhumatao<br />

Please sign, cut out the below letter and post to Neil<br />

Birrell at Auckland Council before November 5.<br />

Neil Birrell<br />

Resource Consent Administrator Auckland Council<br />

Private Bag 92300 Victoria Street West Auckland 1142<br />

SpecialHousingArea@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz<br />

Dear Mr Birrell,<br />

I am an Auckland resident and ratepayer writing to you regarding the plans to<br />

build housing at Ihumātao. I feel as the Ōtuataua Stonefields are council owned I<br />

as a ratepayer should be seen as an adjacent landowner. I am not only objecting<br />

to the building of housing on this site but also objecting to the biased, nondemocratic<br />

and massively flawed Special Housing Area legislation. This letter is<br />

to highlight my issues and to ask for SHA62 plans to be scrapped and for the<br />

Special Housing Area legislation to be halted and reviewed.<br />

Below are the reasons I am against Special Housing Area 62:<br />

- I believe that SHA62 will not contribute to making Auckland a liveable city.<br />

- This area is the birth place of Auckland and should be celebrated, not sold off to<br />

the highest bidders.<br />

- Ihumātao is one of the last remaining original and liveable papakainga in<br />

Aotearoa.<br />

- This land was changed from future rural to future urban. This change by<br />

council only benefits offshore businesses and totally disregards the Heritage<br />

Gateway Project.<br />

- SHA62 is too close to waahi tāpu sites and I feel that it is disrespectful to build<br />

here.<br />

- The full archaeological significance of this heritage site is unknown.<br />

- SHA62 will have a negative impact on Ōtuataua Stonefields.<br />

- SHA62 will have a negative impact on the habitat of the rare shorebirds of the<br />

area.<br />

- Natural restoration of the coastal line is finally to the point where local Māori<br />

can collect food again. Increased water runoff and waste water will put this at<br />

risk.<br />

Although I am not against additional housing initiatives in Auckland I do have<br />

concerns about the Special Housing Area process:<br />

- No public consultation is permitted.<br />

- Land once promised to Auckland residents can be changed without public<br />

consultation.<br />

- Auckland residents have no way to object.<br />

- Residents of Ihumātao, many with an ancestral connection to the first settlers,<br />

have no way to object.<br />

- Auckland councillors have highlighted issues with the system. That there is not<br />

enough time dedicated to give proper thought to each individual SHA application<br />

is just one of them.<br />

- Auckland councillors have admitted to mistakes and misinterpretation of the<br />

facts regarding SHA62.<br />

- Auckland Council can be totally vetoed by current government.<br />

- Research by a group called Save Our Unique Landscape has highlighted many<br />

issues with the process.<br />

I understand that this letter does not exactly fit into your SHA process. However,<br />

I am demanding the right, as a concerned Auckland resident, to have my<br />

objections to SHA62 considered. If I am shut out of this formal process, how will<br />

my voice be heard?<br />

I look forward to your respectful reply to all of the points listed above.<br />

Yours faithfully<br />

Name:<br />

Address:<br />

To donate to the <strong>SOUL</strong> campaign go to: https://givealittle.co.nz/cause/soulstopsha62/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!