08.12.2015 Views

vegetables

VA-NovDec2015

VA-NovDec2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16<br />

Biosecurity Brief<br />

R&D<br />

Market &<br />

Value Chain<br />

Development<br />

with Dr Kevin<br />

Clayton-Greene<br />

THROUGHOUT THIS YEAR, THE BIOSECURITY BRIEF HAS INVESTIGATED THE<br />

EMERGENCY PLANT PEST RESPONSE DEED (THE DEED) AND MECHANISMS FOR<br />

ERADICATING EMERGENCY PLANT PESTS UNDER THE DEED. WITH A FLURRY OF<br />

EXOTIC PLANT PEST INCURSIONS OVER 2014 AND 2015, BIOSECURITY ADVISER DR<br />

KEVIN CLAYTON-GREENE TAKES A LOOK AT EMERGENCY PLANT PEST RESPONSE<br />

LEVIES – WHAT THEY ARE AND HOW THEY CAN BE USED TO BENEFIT INDUSTRY.<br />

Cost benefit analyses often<br />

find that eradication of a<br />

pest is more beneficial than<br />

long-term management, as<br />

long as the pest distribution is<br />

delimited to a contained region<br />

and adequate control options<br />

are available.<br />

However, eradication of plant<br />

pests in Australia is commonly<br />

becoming a joint cost sharing<br />

arrangement between industry<br />

and government under the<br />

Emergency Plant Pest Response<br />

(EPPR) Deed. Within industry,<br />

one method of meeting cost<br />

sharing obligations is to raise an<br />

EPPR levy.<br />

What is the maximum<br />

cost of an eradication<br />

response to industry?<br />

The Deed contains provisions<br />

for signatories, such as<br />

AUSVEG, to agree on a ‘ceiling’<br />

to the amount that will be<br />

eligible for cost sharing during<br />

an eradication. This is known as<br />

the Agreed Limit and can only<br />

be exceeded with the written<br />

agreement of the Affected<br />

Parties.<br />

Under the Deed, EPPs are<br />

organised into four categories<br />

that determine the cost sharing<br />

split between government and<br />

affected industry parties, based<br />

on the public versus private<br />

benefit of eradication. These<br />

categories are a reflection of<br />

where the EPP would impact<br />

should it become established.<br />

Category one: 100 per cent<br />

government.<br />

Category two: 80 per cent<br />

government, 20 per cent<br />

industry.<br />

Category three: 50 per cent<br />

government, 50 per cent<br />

industry.<br />

Category four: 20 per cent<br />

government, 80 per cent<br />

industry.<br />

How does industry<br />

meet its cost sharing<br />

obligation?<br />

The EPPR Levy option became<br />

available since amendments<br />

to the Plant Health Australia<br />

(Plant Industries) Funding Act<br />

2002 commenced on 22 June<br />

2006. If an industry agrees to<br />

contribute to an eradication, an<br />

EPPR levy can be established<br />

to meet financial liabilities for<br />

responses under the Deed.<br />

How does the levy work?<br />

If a majority of industry<br />

participants support the levy or<br />

charge proposal, the industry<br />

body submits the proposal to<br />

the Federal Government for<br />

consideration. If approved, the<br />

levy or charge is imposed and<br />

collected under legislation.<br />

Industries may elect to set the<br />

levy rate at zero, to be activated<br />

in the event of an EPP response<br />

or at a positive level. Apart from<br />

an EPP eradication, an EPPR<br />

levy may also set the levy at<br />

a positive rate to undertake<br />

biosecurity risk mitigation<br />

activities, such as surveillance<br />

and research related to EPPs.<br />

How are EPPR levy funds<br />

managed?<br />

The Federal Government will<br />

collect and forward to Plant<br />

Health Australia (PHA) amounts<br />

raised by the EPPR levy.<br />

PHA is required to hold the<br />

payments for each participating<br />

plant industry in a separate<br />

fund. The accumulated funds<br />

may be applied to biosecurity<br />

activities where support has<br />

been provided by the industry<br />

in accordance with the Federal<br />

Government Levy Principles.<br />

How are EPPR levies<br />

currently used?<br />

Some industries, such as the<br />

vegetable industry, already<br />

have an EPPR levy in place set<br />

at zero, while other industries<br />

have raised their EPPR levy to<br />

a positive value to aid industry<br />

biosecurity preparedness or<br />

contribute to pest eradication.<br />

Some examples of industries<br />

with a positive EPPR levy are<br />

included below.<br />

• The banana industry has an<br />

EPPR levy in place to pay the<br />

industry share for eradication of<br />

Banana freckle in the Northern<br />

Territory. The current EPPR rate<br />

is 0.75 cents per kilogram.<br />

• The mango industry has<br />

an EPPR levy of 0.114 cents<br />

per kilogram that is to be used<br />

for biosecurity preparedness<br />

purposes.<br />

• The honey bee industry<br />

has an EPPR levy in place<br />

at 2.9 cents per kilogram as<br />

a preparedness measure for<br />

incursions of high priority pests<br />

such as Varroa mite, which has<br />

not yet been found in Australia.<br />

Specifically, the levy will fund<br />

development of the National<br />

Bee Biosecurity Program.<br />

i<br />

For more information,<br />

contact AUSVEG.<br />

Phone: (03) 9882 0277<br />

Email: info@ausveg.com.au

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!