26.12.2015 Views

Inequality and Climate Change Inégalité et changement climatique

Inequality

Inequality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Velan & Mohanty: Gender-wise Rural-to-Urban Migration in Orissa, India 153<br />

28.33 per cent are farmers, 13.33 per cent agricultural labourers, <strong>and</strong> 10 per<br />

cent businessmen. The remaining 6.67 per cent each are in service sector or still<br />

unemployed. As for their female counterparts, only five per cent were engaged<br />

as agricultural labourers, while the rest were housewives (73 %) <strong>and</strong> unemployed<br />

(21.67 %) before. Not much had changed for them in three years of the interview.<br />

Only 8.33 per cent are engaged in construction <strong>and</strong> related works, 6.67 per cent<br />

in service sector <strong>and</strong> merely 3.33 per cent as agricultural labourers. The remaining<br />

70 per cent are still housewives <strong>and</strong> 11.67 per cent unemployed. Thus, not much<br />

change is visible in the occupational structure of the non-migrants by gender over<br />

the three year period in their native village.<br />

Table 3 shows the perceived degrees of adverse effects of climate changes<br />

suffered by the sample households by gender <strong>and</strong> category during the June-<br />

September 2008 <strong>and</strong> earlier floods. As Puri is located in a coastal area, all<br />

households reported having suffered varying degrees of adverse effect of the<br />

climate change depending on the proximity of their village to the coast. More<br />

than 70 per cent of all sample households experienced very severe impact of the<br />

adverse climatic changes, excepting non-migrant female households of whom<br />

53.33 per cent had suffered. The impacts were less severe for less than 10 per cent<br />

<strong>and</strong> relatively severe in all cases, wherein the percentage of non-migrant females<br />

was comparatively more. Majority of them had lost their houses, livestock <strong>and</strong><br />

livelihood in the floods. The government had provided them with food <strong>and</strong><br />

drinking water, <strong>and</strong> alternate shelter until the problem receded.<br />

Table 8.3: Perceived Degree of Climatic <strong>Change</strong> Effects<br />

Sl. No. Degree of Adverse Effect Male Female<br />

A. Migrant Household<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

Less severe<br />

Relatively severe<br />

Very severe<br />

9 (15.00)<br />

9 (15.00)<br />

42 (70.00)<br />

5 (8.33)<br />

8 (13.33)<br />

47 (78.34)<br />

Total 60 (100.00) 60 (100.00)<br />

B. Non-Migrant Household<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

Less severe<br />

Relatively severe<br />

Very severe<br />

8 (13.33)<br />

7 (11.67)<br />

45 (75.00)<br />

10 (16.67)<br />

18 (30.00)<br />

32 (53.33)<br />

Total 60 (100.00) 60 (100.00)<br />

Note: Brack<strong>et</strong>s show column percentages.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!