Prestaties op papieren en digitale examens wat is het verschil?
resultaten_literatuuronderzoek
resultaten_literatuuronderzoek
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
McGuire, G.R., Youngson, M.A., Korabinski, A.A., & McMillan, D. (2002). Partial credit in mathematics<br />
exams: a compar<strong>is</strong>on of traditional and CAA exams, Proceedings of the 6th International CAA<br />
Confer<strong>en</strong>ce, Loughborough University.<br />
Mueller, D.J., & Wasser, V. (1977). Implications of changing answers on objective test items. Journal<br />
of Educational Measurem<strong>en</strong>t, 14, 1, 9–14.<br />
Murphy, P.K., Long, J., Holleran, T., & Esterly, E. (2000, August). Persuasion online or on paper: A new<br />
take on an old <strong>is</strong>sue. Paper pres<strong>en</strong>ted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological<br />
Association, Washington, DC.<br />
Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Ximénez, M.C., & Abad, F.J. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of<br />
review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicológica, 21, 157-173.<br />
O’Malley, K.J., Kirkpatrick, R., Sherwood, W., Burdick, H.J., Hsieh, M.C., & Sanford, E.E. (2005, April).<br />
Comparability of a Paper Based and Computer Based Reading Test in Early Elem<strong>en</strong>tary Grades. Paper<br />
pres<strong>en</strong>ted at the AERA Div<strong>is</strong>ion D Graduate Stud<strong>en</strong>t Seminar, Montreal, Canada.<br />
Oregon Departm<strong>en</strong>t of Education (2007). Comparability of stud<strong>en</strong>t scores obtained from paper and<br />
computer admin<strong>is</strong>trations. Salem, OR: Oregon Departm<strong>en</strong>t of Education.<br />
Beschikbaar via<br />
http://www.ode.state.or.us/teachlearn/testing/manuals/2007/doc4.1comparabilitytesat<strong>op</strong>andp.pdf<br />
Pass-it (2002). Good practice guide in question and test design. Luton: CAA C<strong>en</strong>tre.<br />
http://www.calm.hw.ac.uk/G<strong>en</strong>eralAuthoring/031112-goodpracticeguide-hw.pdf<br />
Parshall, C.G., Spray, J.A., Kalohn, J.C., & Davey, T. (2002). Practical considerations in computer-based<br />
testing. New York: Springer-Verlag.<br />
Passmore, T., Brookshaw, L, & Butler, H. (2011). A flexible, ext<strong>en</strong>sible online testing system for<br />
mathematics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 6, 896-906.<br />
Paek, P. (2005). Rec<strong>en</strong>t tr<strong>en</strong>ds in comparability studies. Austin, TX: Educational Measurem<strong>en</strong>t.<br />
Pearson (2009). Computer-based & paper-p<strong>en</strong>cil test comparability studies. Test, Measurem<strong>en</strong>t &<br />
Research Services Bulletin, 9.<br />
Poggio, J., Glasnapp, D. R., Yang, X., & Poggio, A. J. (2005). A comparative evaluation of score results<br />
from computerized and paper and p<strong>en</strong>cil mathematics testing in a large scale state assessm<strong>en</strong>t<br />
program. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessm<strong>en</strong>t 3, 6.<br />
Beschikbaar via http://www.jtla.org<br />
Pommerich, M. (2004). Devel<strong>op</strong>ing computerized versions of paper-and-p<strong>en</strong>cil tests: Mode effects<br />
for passage-based tests. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessm<strong>en</strong>t 2, 6, 1-45.<br />
© Stichting Cito, Arnhem 2015 46
Change language