12.01.2016 Views

ANITA COBBY

WSBA January 2016 Edition

WSBA January 2016 Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WOMEN IN BUSINESS<br />

WWW.WSBA.COM.AU<br />

Screen Australia sets minimum targets for female-led projects<br />

Reel action on gender<br />

IMBALANCE<br />

By Lisa French<br />

Deputy Dean, School of Media<br />

and Communication, RMIT<br />

University, RMIT University<br />

SCREEN Australia has announced a A$5<br />

million plan called Gender Matters, a<br />

three-year suite of initiatives aimed at addressing<br />

gender imbalances in the Australian<br />

film industry.<br />

In order to attract funding, projects<br />

must have at least three of their four key<br />

creative roles – director, writer, producer<br />

and protagonist – occupied by a woman.<br />

This plan follows a string of initiatives<br />

aimed at addressing gender<br />

diversity from within the Australian<br />

film industry.<br />

In the past month, Screen NSW<br />

set targets for 50/50 gender equity<br />

for development and production<br />

funding by 2020; Film Victoria<br />

announced a A$50K partnership<br />

with the Natalie Miller Fellowship<br />

to advance the careers/leadership<br />

roles of women in the screen industry;<br />

and the Australian Director’s<br />

Guild has proposed quotas of 50%<br />

for directors getting Screen Australia<br />

funding.<br />

Women are a vital and underappreciated<br />

part of Australia’s film industry. If Screen<br />

Australia can follow through on these targets,<br />

we might see real change in a stubbornly<br />

persistent gender imbalance.<br />

Best in show: why gender matters<br />

The industry has been slow to acknowledge<br />

the low participation of women, that<br />

they get paid less, and that they are a minority<br />

across key creative fields.<br />

And more significantly, there has been no<br />

acknowledgement that not only are women<br />

not increasing their participation – but in<br />

some areas it is declining. In 1992, women<br />

were 18% of directors of feature films; today<br />

they are only 16%.<br />

One reason this issue has been slow to attract<br />

attention is that Australian women punch<br />

well above their weight in the film industry.<br />

The presence of highly successful women<br />

makes the industry look more representative<br />

than it actually is.<br />

According to my research of the AFI (now<br />

AACTA) feature film categories between<br />

2000 and 2010, women won Best Film 80% of<br />

the time, Best Direction 40% of the time and<br />

Best Original Screenplay 50% of the time.<br />

In that period, women made up, respectively,<br />

33%, 18% and 20% of the workforce in<br />

those<br />

categories.<br />

The Dressmaker.<br />

Courtesy of<br />

Universal Pictures.<br />

The strong performance<br />

of women illustrates the business<br />

case for drawing more women<br />

into the industry. Promoting the work of<br />

women also promotes innovation and diversity<br />

in the stories that are reaching our screens.<br />

It is becoming difficult to ignore that<br />

audiences are flocking to the cinemas to see<br />

films such as The Dressmaker (2015), or to<br />

the small screen to see female-centred Australian<br />

shows such as Puberty Blues (2012),<br />

Wentworth (2013-), Paper Giants: The Birth<br />

of Cleo (2011).<br />

Shows made by female creatives have also<br />

made an impact, such as Miss Fisher’s Murder<br />

Mysteries (2012–), created by Deb Cox and<br />

Fiona Eagger, and Offspring (2010–), created<br />

by Debra Oswald, John Edwards and Imogen<br />

Banks.<br />

Scene from The<br />

Dressmaker.<br />

Quotas or targets?<br />

Senior leadership at Screen<br />

Australia has been very firm<br />

in saying these initiatives<br />

are targets, not quotas. The<br />

operative difference is that a<br />

target is optional and a quota<br />

is mandatory.<br />

The issue of quotas is<br />

complex, but many, including<br />

myself, believe quotas (and affirmative<br />

action) are necessary<br />

to get some change.<br />

However, some women<br />

are ambivalent about them<br />

and it does mean they<br />

have to deal with perceptions<br />

that they got<br />

an unfair<br />

leg-up.<br />

Quotas<br />

can be<br />

seen as<br />

divisive, at at a<br />

time when everyone, men<br />

and women, should be working together to<br />

get the best possible industry.<br />

Setting targets, with firm plans on how<br />

to achieve them, may counterbalance the<br />

perceived drawbacks of quotas.<br />

It’s worth noting that a comparable situation<br />

has played out in the political arena: in<br />

1994 the ALP adopted a quota system, which<br />

Howard rejected as “patronising women”. Today,<br />

the ALP has around twice as many female<br />

“<br />

It’s worth noting that a<br />

comparable situation<br />

has played<br />

out in the<br />

political<br />

arena:<br />

in 1994 the ALP<br />

adopted a quota<br />

system, which Howard<br />

rejected as patronising<br />

women. Today, the ALP<br />

has around twice as many<br />

female MPs as the Liberal<br />

party.”<br />

MPs as the Liberal party.<br />

Ultimately, whether you<br />

call it a target or a quota, the<br />

key will be strong leadership, and<br />

a commitment from Screen Australia<br />

to integrate this policy into every level of<br />

their funding policies.<br />

We know that dedicated resources for underrepresented<br />

populations can have a highly<br />

positive results: Indigenous filmmaking funds<br />

spurred a whole generation of filmmakers<br />

who produced some of the most vibrant work<br />

Australia had seen for decades.<br />

This is long overdue action from the industry,<br />

but is likely to make a significant positive<br />

impact on its success – and I commend the<br />

industry for putting gender on the agenda.<br />

T HIS ARTICLE WAS FIRST PUBLISHED AT WWW.THECONVERSATION.COM.AU<br />

You deserve a Clear Complexion<br />

Whether you have a major skin condition or<br />

an on-going problem, we have the expertise,<br />

latest technology and medical grade skin care<br />

to address a range of skin conditions.<br />

So book an appointment at any Clear<br />

Complexions Clinics for an initial skin<br />

consultation and we can help determine<br />

the best treatment for your skin.<br />

What do we treat?<br />

· Sun damage<br />

· Facial capillaries<br />

· Scarring<br />

· Under eye<br />

rejuvenation<br />

· Large pores<br />

· Rosacea<br />

· Skin tags<br />

· Cherry angioma<br />

· Skin pigmentation<br />

· Acne<br />

· Wrinkles<br />

· Dull, tired<br />

looking skin<br />

· Unwanted hair<br />

· Milia<br />

· Leg veins<br />

· Hair loss<br />

Suzie Hoitink,<br />

Registered Nurse<br />

Founder of the Clear<br />

Complexions Clinics<br />

Associate Member of<br />

the ACCS & ACSM<br />

Norwest Unit 125, Level 1, 14-16 Lexington Dr, Bella Vista | T 02 8960 7480<br />

Balmain 2A Rowntree St | T 02 9555 7287<br />

clearcomplexions.com.au<br />

34 WESTERN SYDNEY BUSINESS ACCESS JANUARY 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!