26.01.2016 Views

Mathematics

ConferenceProceedings_EducatingTheEducators_MaassBarzelToernerEtAl_2015

ConferenceProceedings_EducatingTheEducators_MaassBarzelToernerEtAl_2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Content focused peer coaching and the development of lesson<br />

plans about scientific inquiry -<br />

H. Weitzel, R. Blank<br />

University of Education Weingarten, Germany<br />

Background<br />

Scientists, science teacher educators, and classroom teachers agree that<br />

students should hold knowledge about scientific inquiry, because scientific<br />

inquiry is seen as an indispensable component of scientific literacy (Abell,<br />

2007; Lunetta et al., 2007). Based on this assumption several countries all<br />

over the world have implemented teaching standards for scientific inquiry (e.g.<br />

EDK, 2011; KMK, 2004). According to those standards scientific inquiry is<br />

defined as an active and idealized learning process modelled after the inquiry<br />

process of professional scientists. It is a content of itself, comprising reflective<br />

knowledge about scientific thinking, scientific methods, techniques of<br />

laboratory work like planning and executing experiments and the Nature of<br />

Science.<br />

As learning outcomes are, at least in part, depending on the quality of<br />

classroom teaching, learning to create an inquiry-oriented lesson is a core part<br />

of science teacher education (NGSS, 2013; Windschitl, 2003). Frequently<br />

science teacher students as well as inservice teachers struggle with planning<br />

inquiry-oriented lessons (e.g. Schneider & Plasman, 2011). Among the<br />

reasons are unfavourable beliefs about scientific inquiry, little experience with<br />

scientific thinking and scientific methods in school and teacher education,<br />

insufficient knowledge about central terms like “hypothesis” and<br />

“experimentation”, and at a more administrative level missing or insufficient<br />

teaching standards related to scientific inquiry that can be used to develop<br />

learning opportunities for future science teachers (e.g. Asay & Orgil, 2010;<br />

Gyllenpalm & Wickman, 2011; Hasse et al., 2014). Unlike the US (NGSS,<br />

2013) in Germany exist rather general standards for science teacher education<br />

(KMK, 2004; GFD, 2005) that require educators on the university level to<br />

individually specify what science teacher students should learn to be able to<br />

plan and analyse inquiry-oriented science lessons. Furthermore, empirical<br />

data about successful teaching strategies fostering science teacher students’<br />

orientations and knowledge about planning inquiry-oriented lessons is small in<br />

number (e.g. Capps & Crawford, 2013).<br />

Reflected experience in school-based learning environments is considered a<br />

key element for the transition from novel to professional teacher (Wanzare,<br />

2007). A popular approach to enrich practice-based learning opportunities is<br />

mentoring by more experienced teachers, which can occur before, during, and<br />

after lessons (Schwille, 2008; West & Staub, 2003). Recent studies have<br />

shown that supported lesson planning is an effective learning opportunity for<br />

student teachers with respect to different indicators like self-reported changes<br />

325

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!