09.02.2016 Views

THE BRATTLE GROUP

pvrbYG

pvrbYG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I. Introduction<br />

In 2013, WIRES published a report developed by The Brattle Group to document available<br />

experience with identifying and analyzing the wide range of benefits offered by transmission<br />

investments. 2 This current report focuses on the costs and risks that an insufficiently robust and<br />

insufficiently flexible transmission infrastructure imposes on customers and society as a whole. It<br />

reviews and documents actual industry practice and the extent to which transmission-related<br />

benefits are or are not considered in the regional and interregional planning processes used by the<br />

regional transmission organizations (RTOs) and in some non-RTO regions in the U.S. We reiterate<br />

the importance of recognizing and considering all transmission-related benefits to achieve a more<br />

cost-effective power system and mitigate risks to consumers and society as a whole, and also to<br />

identify gaps, barriers, and opportunities for planning economically-efficient transmission,<br />

particularly with respect to interregional planning.<br />

The facilities that constitute the U.S. high-voltage transmission system typically have physical lives<br />

ranging from 40 to 80 years. The existing transmission grid was developed over the past six decades,<br />

with the largest percentage of the investment made in the 1960s and 1970s. 3 The large extent to<br />

which we still rely on transmission infrastructure built in the 1960s and 1970s shows that the<br />

infrastructure, once built, is associated with long-term economic benefits of a range and magnitude<br />

far beyond those anticipated at the time when policy makers and market participants planned the<br />

system upgrades. This experience shows that a robust and flexible transmission system provides<br />

many positive externalities not typically considered by planners when they identify the specific<br />

“need” for transmission infrastructure.<br />

While very little transmission infrastructure was added in the two decades between 1985 and 2005,<br />

the most recent decade has again seen a significant increase in transmission investments. Annual<br />

transmission investments by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission)<br />

jurisdictional transmission owners ranged only from $2 billion to $4 billion per year in the decade<br />

ending 2005. However, since 2010, U.S. transmission investments have ranged from $10 billion to<br />

$16 billion per year and, despite year-to-year fluctuations, are forecast to remain at that level<br />

through 2030. 4 The higher recent investment levels lead to a sentiment that enough investment has<br />

been made and that further increases in transmission rates should be avoided. This sentiment has<br />

2<br />

Chang, Pfeifenberger, and Hagerty (2013) (hereinafter 2013 WIRES Report).<br />

3<br />

U.S.-wide annual transmission additions at a voltage level above 132kV ranged from 4,000 to 9,000 circuit<br />

miles per year between 1960s and the early 1980s, but have been only 1,000 to 2,000 circuit miles from<br />

1985 through 2005. In recent years, annual additions have ranged between 2,000 and 6,000 circuit miles.<br />

See Pfeifenberger, Chang, Tsoukalis (2014).<br />

4<br />

Id.<br />

1 | brattle.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!