07.12.2012 Views

Interstitial Cystitis versus BPSXX-BPS33 - ICA-Deutschland e.V.

Interstitial Cystitis versus BPSXX-BPS33 - ICA-Deutschland e.V.

Interstitial Cystitis versus BPSXX-BPS33 - ICA-Deutschland e.V.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Position paper of the <strong>ICA</strong>-<strong>Deutschland</strong> Medical Advisory Board<br />

<strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong> <strong>versus</strong> <strong>BPSXX</strong>-<strong>BPS33</strong><br />

Keep the established name or taxonomic revolution?<br />

The European Society for the Study of <strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong>/Painful Bladder Syndrome (ESSIC) drafted a<br />

consensus statement at its last meeting which recommends no longer using the name "<strong>Interstitial</strong><br />

<strong>Cystitis</strong>" (IC), either alone nor in any combinations. Instead it recommends using the abbreviation BPS<br />

for "Bladder Pain Syndrome" followed by a double-digit type indicator. It should be noted that the<br />

recommended abbreviation is BPS and not the abbreviation PBS/IC (painful bladder syndrome) as<br />

introduced by ICS and included in the EAU guidelines.<br />

This recommendation has caused considerable irritation in international forums.<br />

ESSIC is an independent society which has had annual meetings since 2003. It currently proposes a<br />

new definition for this disease complex based on the symptom of chronic pain related to the urinary<br />

bladder, accompanied by at least one other urinary symptom such as daytime and night time<br />

frequency and excluding a mentioned list of confusable diseases. The diagnosis of these confusable<br />

diseases does not, however, systematically rule out BPS.<br />

In this connection the proposal by ESSIC to abbreviate the finding constellation of 1. cystoscopy with<br />

hydrodistension and 2. biopsy by a double-digit code (hydrodistension: X=not done, 1=normal,<br />

2=glomerulations, 3=Hunner's lesion // Biopsy: X=not done, A=normal, B=inconclusive, C=positive)<br />

certainly constitutes a simplification in order to abbreviate the results of established diagnostic<br />

techniques in the case of suspected <strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong>.<br />

The abolition of the term "<strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong>" has, however a completely different scope and<br />

consequences which the members of the medical advisory board of Förderverein <strong>ICA</strong>-<br />

<strong>Deutschland</strong> e.V. expressly disassociate themselves from.<br />

"<strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong>" is still unexplained in terms of its etiology. It is a burden both for those concerned<br />

and the attending physicians. It was still largely unknown to many physicians and public authorities 15<br />

years ago. Following many years of honorary work, the Scientific Advisory Board of <strong>ICA</strong> Germany, like<br />

many other international IC societies, has promoted awareness and research on <strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong>. At<br />

present, <strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong> is well established in the ICD key (N30.1), as a Medline MESH keyword<br />

with >1500 hits and a term which has a clear meaning not only for most urologists, gynaecologists and<br />

family doctors but also for pension and social security organisations, courts and sickness funds that<br />

find both literature and case law under this term. If the term IC were to be abolished, these efforts<br />

would have to start again from scratch.<br />

There is no doubt that the term IC describing an "inflammmation in the interstitium of the urinary<br />

bladder" can be contested in histopathological and terminological terms. A sub-division of the<br />

symptoms appears to be useful (whether this should only be done based on the results of biopsy and<br />

hydrodistension or whether for instance pain scores, urination logs should be used, is not discussed<br />

here).<br />

However, there are also other historically established terminological errors in our language. Men, for<br />

instance, can be hysterical despite the usual absence of a uterus and the German term<br />

"Blinddarmentzündung" for appendicitis is actually a “Wurmfortsatzentzündung”.<br />

And Hunner's lesion called “Hunner’s ulcer” in German is actually not an ulcer (because the latter<br />

would by definition presuppose a defect in the Lamina propria). The hypernephrome has nothing to do<br />

with "hyper" and mycosis fungoides is not a fungus disease but a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Even<br />

acute pancreatitis is actually a necrosis in pathohistological terms but is used as an "-itis" term.<br />

If one accepted the terminological hair-splitting of taxonomists who want to change, after lengthy<br />

discussions, the term Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS) to Bladder Pain Syndrome (BPS), similar to the<br />

Perineal Pain Syndrome (PPS) existing in the NIH nomenclature, it would actually have been<br />

consistent to create a VPS – Vesical Pain Syndrome.<br />

Of course, the work undertaken by ESSIC deserves our full respect and many of its members are also<br />

close to the <strong>ICA</strong> Advisory Board. However, we consider that it is slightly strange that a Society which<br />

uses the established terms IC (and PBS) itself in its name is recommending no longer using the term<br />

before even changing its own name.


Whether we really do our patients a favour with the diagnosis of for instance a "bladder pain syndrome<br />

X3" is at least in doubt. We should not suggest to our patients that the disease which they may have<br />

been suffering from for several years, no longer exists according to the current terminology.<br />

Maybe it is the phenomenon of the German spelling reform chaos (which may be seen as a piece of<br />

bungling by certain publishers of school books) that suggests that new spellings for old terms are<br />

progress in themselves. In the current hype for new designations we should actually focus on the<br />

essentials.<br />

That means advancing etiology and sound therapeutic studies with a high evidence level, representing<br />

the knowledge available on <strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong> in a neutral and unbiased manner and - pending the<br />

availability of better findings - acting as a serious advocate of patients.<br />

Against the backdrop of this argumentation, a survey amongst the Working Group Infectiology of DGU<br />

(German Society for Urology) revealed that an overwhelming majority of its members are in favour of<br />

maintaining the term IC in the nomenclature.<br />

Since new definitions without new etiological findings do not justify a new designation of IC, the<br />

Scientific Advisory Board of <strong>ICA</strong> unanimously decided at its meeting on January 19, 2007 to continue<br />

to use the term "IC" and we call on everybody else to proceed in this manner. At the 59th Congress of<br />

our expert society we are looking forward to a forum on "<strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong>".<br />

A new coinage for "<strong>Interstitial</strong> <strong>Cystitis</strong>" should be reserved for the day on which the underlying causes<br />

of this disease have at last have been clarified.<br />

1. Oberpenning, Frank Chief of Staff of the Clinic for Urology and Child Urology, St.-Agnes-<br />

Hospital Bocholt, Barloer Weg 125, 46397 Bocholt, Telephone:0 28 71 / 20 29 31,Telefax:0 28<br />

71 / 20 29 32, E-Mail: f.oberpenning@st-agnes-bocholt.de<br />

2. Ragi Doggweiler, MD, Ass. Prof, Dep. of Urology University of Tennessee Knoxville, USA<br />

rdoggweiler@yahoo.com<br />

3. Jocham, Dieter, Director of the Clinic and Policlinic for Urology of the University Clinic<br />

Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Tel.: +49-451-500-2271, Fax: +49-<br />

451-500-3338, Email: Prof.Jocham.MUL@t-online.de<br />

4. Loch, Annemie, Gynaecological Clinic of the Diaconesse Clinic, Teaching Hospital of the<br />

University of Schleswig-Holstein, Marienhölzungsweg 2, 24939 Flensburg, Telephone: +49<br />

461-812-1405 /1401, E-Mail: lochan@diako.de<br />

5. Roth, Stefan, Director of the Urology Clinic, Helios Kliniken Wuppertal GmbH, Heusnerstraße<br />

40, D-42283 Wuppertal, Tel.: +49 2 02 8 96 - 34 09, Fax: 0202-896-3408, E-Mail:<br />

sroth@wuppertal.helios-kliniken.de<br />

6. Schultz-Lampel, Daniela, Director of the Continence Centre Southwest at Schwarzwald-Baar<br />

Klinikum in Villingen-Schwenningen, Gebäude K, Röntgenstr. 20,78054 Villingen-<br />

Schwenningen, Telephone: 07720 / 93-0, Telefax: 07720 / 93-2498, E-Mail: ksw@sbk-vs.de<br />

7. Stoerkel, Stefan, Director of the Institute for Pathology, Helios-Kliniken Wuppertal GmbH,<br />

Heusnerstraße 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Telephone: +49 2 02 8 96 - 28 50, Fax +49 2 02 8 96 –<br />

2739, E-Mail: sstoerkel@wuppertal.helios-kliniken.de<br />

8. Stratmeyer, Rudolf, Head of the Urology Department, Specialist Clinic Rodenkirchen,<br />

Schillingsrotter Str. 39-45, 50996 Köln/Rodenkirchen, Telephone:0221-9352925, Fax:0221-<br />

9352927, E-Mail: Stratmeyer@t-online.de<br />

9. Thueroff, Joachim W., Director of the Urology Clinic and Policlinic of the Johannes Gutenberg<br />

University, Langenbeckstr. 1, D-55101 Mainz, Tel.: 06131-177183, Fax: 06131-232986,Email:<br />

Thueroff@urologie.klinik.uni-mainz.de<br />

10. Vahlensieck, Winfried, Chief of Staff of the Urology Department of Clinic Wildetal,<br />

Mühlenstraße 8, 34537 Bad Wildungen, Telephone:05621-881032 , Fax:05621-881010, E-<br />

Mail: Winfried.Vahlensieck@t-online.de<br />

11. Van Ahlen, Hermann, Chief of Staff of the Urology Clinic of the Municipal Clinics, Am<br />

Finkenhügel 1, D-49076 Osnabrück, Tel.: 0541-405 8001, Fax: 0541-405-8099, E-mail:<br />

vanAhlen@t-online.de<br />

12. Woerdehoff, Alois. Practice Clinic, Ursulinenstr. 39, 53879 Euskirchen, Telephone:02251-<br />

770077, Fax: 02251- 770078, E-Mail: AWOER@t-online.de<br />

13. Hertle, Lothar, Director of the Clinic and Policlinic for Urology, University Clinic Münster,<br />

Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33,48149 Münster, Tel: 0251-8347442, Fax: 0251-8349739, E-Mail:<br />

prof.hertle@uni-muenster.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!