04.03.2016 Views

ECONOMICS YEARLY REVIEW

Law_and_Economics_Yearly_Review_LEYR_Journal_vol_4_part_2_2015

Law_and_Economics_Yearly_Review_LEYR_Journal_vol_4_part_2_2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

equires detailed specification of these medium-term processes to become operational and<br />

to achieve its declared goals.<br />

Key words: Economic and Monetary Union, Banking Union, Capital Markets Union JEL<br />

classification numbers: E60, G01, E44, E51<br />

SUMMARY: 1. Introduction. - 2. The unsatisfactory economic record of the euro zone. 3. - The 5PR proposals<br />

to ensure a ‛genuine’ EMU. - 4. The key role of the Financial and Capital Markets Unions (CMU) and<br />

the issue of the right approach: law changes (5PR) or bottom-up model (Commissioner Hill)? - 5. Conclusions.<br />

1. The objective of a European EMU of stable prices, open markets, shared<br />

prosperity, employment, innovation and sustainable growth has been advocated and<br />

actively pursued for a long period. The official approach to EMU dates back to the Summit<br />

Meeting in the Hague in 1969. The Monetary Union was achieved at the end of last<br />

century, after the signing of two Treaties with a strong economic and fiscal content<br />

(Maastricht, 1992 and Amsterdam, 1997). The thirty years between 1969 and 1999 cover<br />

what I call here Phase 1 of EMU (Appendix 1).<br />

The following fifteen years (2000-June 2015) span Phase 2, which refers to the operation<br />

and workings of the independent monetary policy of the ECB, the signing of many Pacts of<br />

economic nature, the build-up of the Great Financial Crisis (2007-2009) and a subsequent<br />

repair and recovery period, notably with the creation of the Banking Union (BU) (2013).<br />

Much has been achieved and major difficulties were overcome during the past half<br />

century. But the track record, especially in Phase 2, makes it legitimate to ask whether the<br />

policies adopted, in particular during the operation of the euro, have been appropriate<br />

and, if not, what changes are required. In any event, the task of ensuring a true and<br />

genuine economic union overcoming the difficulties of monetary unification in a nonoptimal<br />

currency area has not been accomplished. This strong proposition is, somewhat<br />

paradoxically, a conclusion which can be found in an official, highly important document of<br />

the EU: the “Five Presidents’ Report” (5PR) of June 2015 (Juncker et al., 2015). This paper<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!