14.04.2016 Views

ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY

1SANK0H

1SANK0H

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 GUARANTEE A – PROCESSING SHOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW AND BASED ON<br />

CLEAR, PRECISE AND ACCESSIBLE RULES 34<br />

3.2.1 EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333 AND PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE 28 35<br />

3.2.2 FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT 36<br />

3.2.3 CONCLUSION 37<br />

3.3 GUARANTEE B – NECESSITY AND PROPORTIONALITY WITH REGARD TO THE LEGITIMATE<br />

OBJECTIVES PURSUED NEED TO BE DEMONSTRATED 37<br />

3.3.1 PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE 28 37<br />

3.3.2 FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT 38<br />

3.3.3 CONCLUSION 40<br />

3.4 GUARANTEE C - AN INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT MECHANISM SHOULD EXIST 40<br />

3.4.1 INTERNAL OVERSIGHT 40<br />

3.4.2 EXTERNAL OVERSIGHT 41<br />

3.4.3 CONCLUSION 42<br />

3.5 GUARANTEE D - EFFECTIVE REMEDIES NEED TO BE AVAILABLE TO THE INDIVIDUAL 43<br />

3.5.1 JUDICIAL REMEDIES 43<br />

3.5.1.1 STANDING REQUIREMENT 43<br />

3.5.1.2 PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE 28 44<br />

3.5.1.3 FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT 44<br />

3.5.2 ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 44<br />

3.5.2.1 INSPECTORS-GENERAL 44<br />

3.5.2.2 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 44<br />

3.5.3 PRIVACY SHIELD OMBUDSPERSON 45<br />

3.5.3.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF AN OMBUDSPERSON 45<br />

3.5.3.2 THE ASSESSMENT OF THE NEW OMBUDSPERSON MECHANISM 46<br />

3.5.3.3 CAN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN OMBUDSPERSON PER SE BE SUFFICIENT? 46<br />

3.5.3.4 THE SCOPE OF APPLICATION OF THE OMBUDSPERSON MECHANISM 47<br />

3.5.3.5 ‘STANDING’ AND THE PROCEDURE OF THE REQUEST 48<br />

3.5.3.6 INDEPENDENCE 49<br />

3.5.3.7 INVESTIGATORY POWERS 50<br />

3.5.3.8 REMEDIAL POWERS 50<br />

3.5.4 IN CONCLUSION 51<br />

3.6 CONCLUDING REMARKS ON SAFEGUARDS AND LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO U.S. NATIONAL<br />

SECURITY AUTHORITIES 51<br />

4. ASSESSMENT OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT GUARANTEES OF THE PRIVACY<br />

SHIELD 52<br />

4.1 INTRODUCTION 52<br />

4.2 APPLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN ESSENTIAL GUARANTEES TO ACCESS BY LAW<br />

ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES TO <strong>DATA</strong> HELD BY CORPORATIONS 53<br />

4.2.1 ACCESS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES TO PERSONAL <strong>DATA</strong> SHOULD BE IN<br />

ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW AND BASED ON CLEAR, PRECISE AND ACCESSIBLE RULES 53<br />

4.2.2 NECESSITY AND PROPORTIONALITY WITH REGARD TO THE LEGITIMATE OBJECTIVES<br />

PURSUED NEED TO BE DEMONSTRATED 53<br />

4.2.3 AN INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT MECHANISM SHOULD EXIST 55<br />

4.2.4 EFFECTIVE REMEDIES NEED TO BE AVAILABLE TO THE INDIVIDUAL 55<br />

4.3 CONCLUDING REMARKS 56<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57<br />

5.1 THREE POINTS OF CONCERN 57<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!