08.12.2012 Views

Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website

Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website

Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Executive Summary<br />

<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>kea</strong> (Nestor notabilis)<br />

Address for correspondence: 9 Mayroyd Terrace, Nelson.<br />

joshkemp@ihug.co.nz<br />

Investigation overview<br />

<strong>Kea</strong> (Nestor notabilis) are large green parrots endemic to the montane areas <strong>of</strong> New<br />

Zealand’s South Island. An extensive amount <strong>of</strong> their habitat is reserved in the New<br />

Zealand system <strong>of</strong> national parks, within which <strong>kea</strong> are currently widespread (Bull et al.<br />

1985), albeit at a very low density <strong>of</strong> approximately one bird per square mile (Jackson<br />

1960; Clarke 1970; Bond & Diamond 1992).<br />

<strong>Kea</strong> are presently classified by the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> as a second priority<br />

threatened species (Molloy & Davis 1994), but remarkably little is known about the size<br />

and status <strong>of</strong> the wild population (Diamond & Bond 1999; Temple 1996). Anderson<br />

(1986) guessed a total population size <strong>of</strong> 1000-5000 individuals by extrapolating a<br />

density <strong>of</strong> one bird per square mile to the rest <strong>of</strong> the Southern Alps. A more precise<br />

estimate is not available due to the lack <strong>of</strong> a reliable, cost-effective survey method.<br />

A total <strong>kea</strong> population <strong>of</strong> 5000 (the upper limit <strong>of</strong> Anderson’s guess) is small enough to<br />

conclude that the <strong>kea</strong> population has declined to some extent since the late 1800s – mid<br />

1900s. During this period, <strong>kea</strong> abundance was such that 150 000 individuals were legally<br />

killed under a government bounty scheme. To enable such a cull to take place, <strong>kea</strong> must<br />

have been considerably more abundant than they are today. The anecdotes <strong>of</strong> old-time<br />

high country users support this conjecture; encounters with large flocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>kea</strong> are now<br />

relatively rare.<br />

ii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!