Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website
Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website
Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Executive Summary<br />
<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>kea</strong> (Nestor notabilis)<br />
Address for correspondence: 9 Mayroyd Terrace, Nelson.<br />
joshkemp@ihug.co.nz<br />
Investigation overview<br />
<strong>Kea</strong> (Nestor notabilis) are large green parrots endemic to the montane areas <strong>of</strong> New<br />
Zealand’s South Island. An extensive amount <strong>of</strong> their habitat is reserved in the New<br />
Zealand system <strong>of</strong> national parks, within which <strong>kea</strong> are currently widespread (Bull et al.<br />
1985), albeit at a very low density <strong>of</strong> approximately one bird per square mile (Jackson<br />
1960; Clarke 1970; Bond & Diamond 1992).<br />
<strong>Kea</strong> are presently classified by the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> as a second priority<br />
threatened species (Molloy & Davis 1994), but remarkably little is known about the size<br />
and status <strong>of</strong> the wild population (Diamond & Bond 1999; Temple 1996). Anderson<br />
(1986) guessed a total population size <strong>of</strong> 1000-5000 individuals by extrapolating a<br />
density <strong>of</strong> one bird per square mile to the rest <strong>of</strong> the Southern Alps. A more precise<br />
estimate is not available due to the lack <strong>of</strong> a reliable, cost-effective survey method.<br />
A total <strong>kea</strong> population <strong>of</strong> 5000 (the upper limit <strong>of</strong> Anderson’s guess) is small enough to<br />
conclude that the <strong>kea</strong> population has declined to some extent since the late 1800s – mid<br />
1900s. During this period, <strong>kea</strong> abundance was such that 150 000 individuals were legally<br />
killed under a government bounty scheme. To enable such a cull to take place, <strong>kea</strong> must<br />
have been considerably more abundant than they are today. The anecdotes <strong>of</strong> old-time<br />
high country users support this conjecture; encounters with large flocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>kea</strong> are now<br />
relatively rare.<br />
ii