Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website
Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website
Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
31% <strong>of</strong> nests. At one <strong>of</strong> these nests one <strong>of</strong> the nestlings had previously been radio-tagged<br />
and we recovered its carcass from a stoat den about 100m below the nest. Tooth marks<br />
on the transmitter were consistent with stoat dentition and the dead chick’s nest-mate was<br />
missing. In further data analyses, we include this nest as one from which the chicks<br />
mysteriously disappeared, as this would have been the case had the chick not been radio-<br />
tagged. At no period in the nesting cycle were nest contents particularly likely to<br />
disappear (Fig. 4).<br />
Figure 4. Stage in the breeding cycle at which nest contents disappeared.<br />
Frequency<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Overall nest survival<br />
0- 10- 20- 30- 40- 50- 60- 70- 80- 90- 100- 110-<br />
The overall daily nest survival rate excluding accidental failures was 0.995 (SE = 0.001),<br />
equivalent to at least 57% (95% CI = 40-79%) <strong>of</strong> nests avoiding nest predation. If<br />
accidental failure occurs at 6% <strong>of</strong> nests (see above), then the overall nest survival rate<br />
will be 51% (95%CI = 34-73%).<br />
Time since egg laying (days)<br />
15