08.12.2012 Views

Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website

Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website

Conservation ecology of kea - Kea Conservation Trust website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

31% <strong>of</strong> nests. At one <strong>of</strong> these nests one <strong>of</strong> the nestlings had previously been radio-tagged<br />

and we recovered its carcass from a stoat den about 100m below the nest. Tooth marks<br />

on the transmitter were consistent with stoat dentition and the dead chick’s nest-mate was<br />

missing. In further data analyses, we include this nest as one from which the chicks<br />

mysteriously disappeared, as this would have been the case had the chick not been radio-<br />

tagged. At no period in the nesting cycle were nest contents particularly likely to<br />

disappear (Fig. 4).<br />

Figure 4. Stage in the breeding cycle at which nest contents disappeared.<br />

Frequency<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Overall nest survival<br />

0- 10- 20- 30- 40- 50- 60- 70- 80- 90- 100- 110-<br />

The overall daily nest survival rate excluding accidental failures was 0.995 (SE = 0.001),<br />

equivalent to at least 57% (95% CI = 40-79%) <strong>of</strong> nests avoiding nest predation. If<br />

accidental failure occurs at 6% <strong>of</strong> nests (see above), then the overall nest survival rate<br />

will be 51% (95%CI = 34-73%).<br />

Time since egg laying (days)<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!