24.05.2016 Views

THE HOLOCAUST AND THE UNITED NATIONS OUTREACH PROGRAMME

1PMBQAu

1PMBQAu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

128<br />

The Holocaust and the United Nations Outreach Programme<br />

attention during the first ten years has naturally focused on building<br />

a common understanding of the principle, the Secretary-General<br />

concluded that time has now come to move from conceptual debates<br />

towards more practical consideration of implementation.<br />

A Turn to Implementation<br />

The adoption of the responsibility to protect reflected widespread<br />

recognition that the status quo was both inadequate and unacceptable.<br />

The principle was not designed to be a comfortable rhetorical<br />

restatement of common values, but rather a spur to action. Judged<br />

on this basis, it is clear that the principle remains painfully relevant.<br />

Acts that may constitute genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and<br />

crimes against humanity are occurring in the Central African Republic,<br />

the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Democratic Republic<br />

of North Korea, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, and<br />

Yemen. These situations have created protection challenges of a staggering<br />

scale and produced widespread humanitarian crises, including<br />

a global migration and refugee crisis.<br />

In more general terms, too many Member States have yet to become<br />

parties to the international conventions that set out the legal framework<br />

for the prevention and punishment of atrocity crimes, including<br />

the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime<br />

of Genocide, the Geneva Conventions and the Rome Statute of the<br />

International Criminal Court. We are currently witnessing an alarming<br />

decline in the protection of human rights and respect for international<br />

humanitarian law, particularly in situations where national<br />

authorities have argued that exceptional security threats or political<br />

crises justify temporary abrogation from their legal obligations.<br />

On moral, political and legal grounds, the international community<br />

must do better. The imperative to accelerate implementation of<br />

the responsibility to protect is clear. Atrocity crimes directly challenge<br />

our common humanity. They have deep and lasting effects,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!