01.06.2016 Views

Considering Family Reconnection and Reunification after Child Sexual Abuse

1VwGeds

1VwGeds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

complex questions of separation, reporting,<br />

court procedures, prosecution, sentencing,<br />

community <strong>and</strong> family reactions, <strong>and</strong><br />

economic insecurity.<br />

It can be difficult for many people to fully<br />

take in the fact that the successful <strong>and</strong><br />

safe integration of the adult or youth who<br />

sexually abused back into a community<br />

means that every child <strong>and</strong> community is<br />

safer. This is the ultimate goal for every<br />

professional working towards community<br />

safety, whether they are victim advocates,<br />

sex-offender treatment providers,<br />

probation or parole officers, or childprotective-services<br />

case managers.<br />

Most of these same professionals would<br />

also agree that family reunification is not<br />

the ultimate goal for every case. In fact,<br />

reunification should only be considered if<br />

safety can be maintained for everyone in<br />

the family, especially with the safety of the<br />

child who was victimized at the center of<br />

the discussion.<br />

Ideally, as part of the healing process,<br />

the family will develop a structured<br />

way to acknowledge <strong>and</strong> discuss how<br />

A note about language<br />

How we talk <strong>and</strong> think about the<br />

dynamics of sexual abuse <strong>and</strong> those<br />

involved can have profound effects on<br />

how we approach the work.<br />

With that in mind, this document<br />

will use “person-first” language<br />

to honor the various ways people<br />

self-identify <strong>and</strong> to emphasize<br />

that a behavior or experience<br />

does not define the whole person.<br />

Descriptions of someone’s behavior<br />

such as “the person who sexually<br />

abused a child,” “the child who<br />

was sexually abused” or the “child<br />

who was harmed” are used rather<br />

than defining an individual by<br />

their actions or what happened<br />

to them (e.g. offender, abuser, or<br />

victim, survivor.)<br />

Describing someone as a “person”<br />

first, whose life has been affected<br />

by a behavior or experience,<br />

avoids defining them solely by that<br />

experience. It asks us to consider that<br />

people can change, heal <strong>and</strong> grow,<br />

<strong>and</strong> develop new, healthier identities.<br />

Person-first language dem<strong>and</strong>s hope.<br />

While this document is primarily<br />

for sexual assault advocates, much<br />

of this information can also be useful<br />

to many other service providers.<br />

When the document refers to<br />

sexual assault advocates <strong>and</strong> other<br />

professionals, this includes clinicians,<br />

probation officers, child protection<br />

service workers, <strong>and</strong> others who<br />

may work with children who were<br />

sexually abused.<br />

6 www.nsvrc.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!