08.12.2012 Views

Sweet Tooth for Empire: Sugar and the British Atlantic World

Sweet Tooth for Empire: Sugar and the British Atlantic World

Sweet Tooth for Empire: Sugar and the British Atlantic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in Rowl<strong>and</strong>son’s experience, however, her narrative also demonstrates contradictions between<br />

her unique experience <strong>and</strong> salvation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> orthodoxy of Puritan doctrine.<br />

While Rowl<strong>and</strong>son’s Puritan faith clearly shaped her experience, her unique individual<br />

experience contradicts <strong>the</strong> community based Puritan covenant. Captivity narratives emphasized<br />

<strong>the</strong> redemption of <strong>the</strong> individual captive, not <strong>the</strong> entire Puritan community. 60 Rowl<strong>and</strong>son<br />

testifies to <strong>the</strong> Lord’s strength in carrying her through her ordeal “so much that I could never<br />

have thought of it had I not experienced it.” 61 Her statement emphasizes that her personal<br />

experience is unique; by enduring captivity, Rowl<strong>and</strong>son achieved an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong><br />

Lord’s power that she could not have achieved o<strong>the</strong>rwise. Her knowledge of <strong>the</strong> Lord sets her<br />

apart from <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> community; through her affliction, Rowl<strong>and</strong>son achieved redemption<br />

<strong>for</strong> herself but not <strong>for</strong> her community. In <strong>the</strong> final sentences of her narrative, Rowl<strong>and</strong>son states,<br />

“But now I see <strong>the</strong> Lord had His time to scourge <strong>and</strong> chasten me” <strong>and</strong> claims unique<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong> Lord’s mercy as she has “learned to look beyond present <strong>and</strong> smaller<br />

troubles <strong>and</strong> be quieted by <strong>the</strong>m.” 62 When Rowl<strong>and</strong>son’s hope of rescue by <strong>the</strong> English <strong>and</strong> her<br />

husb<strong>and</strong> failed during her captivity, she asks her captors to allow her privacy so she “might get<br />

alone <strong>and</strong> pour out my heart unto <strong>the</strong> Lord.” 63 This incident demonstrates a very personal<br />

relationship between Rowl<strong>and</strong>son <strong>and</strong> God; Rowl<strong>and</strong>son alone communicates with God without<br />

<strong>the</strong> mediation of a minister. Her direct communication <strong>and</strong> personal relationship with God<br />

challenges <strong>the</strong> community based Puritan doctrine, <strong>and</strong> it demonstrates that <strong>the</strong> isolation of<br />

wilderness captivity allowed <strong>for</strong> an unmediated connection with God.<br />

60 Fitzpatrick, “The Figure of Captivity,” 6.<br />

61 Rowl<strong>and</strong>son, “The Narrative of <strong>the</strong> Captivity,” 309.<br />

62 Rowl<strong>and</strong>son, “The Narrative of <strong>the</strong> Captivity,” 328.<br />

63 Rowl<strong>and</strong>son, “The Narrative of <strong>the</strong> Captivity,” 317.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!