KITIMAT DRAFT Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3) An overwhelming majority of respondents believe that there is a strong link between Health & Safety and RTW and is demonstrated by the policy. As less than half of the respondents in previous questions agreed that there was a RTW Policy, it can be assumed that the strong response in this question would support that respondents believe that ‘IF” a RTW Policy exists, it should support a strong link between H&S and RTW. Chart 5 The RTW Policy supports a link between health & safety and RTW 16% 4) Less than half of respondents agree that there is a formal RTW Program. Chart 6 40% 35% 13% 9% 1% 4% 18% 39% 25% Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Unknown Whole Audience Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree The organization has a formal RTW Program. Strongly Agree <strong>DRAFT</strong> Somewhat Agree Unknown Whole Audience Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree 10 Situational Assessment District of Kitimat
5) Almost all of the management responses confirmed that they agreed that there was a RTW Program, but few others had knowledge of a program if it exists. A strong indicator that a communication plan regarding the RTW Program is needed. Chart 7 27% Opera8ons Maintenance Union Leadership 16% Management 0 5 10 15 20 25 Percent of Total 6% 29% 22% Question 11 Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Unknown Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree 6) The responses here support that a communication plan regarding the RTW Program, and its identification of roles and responsibilities needs to be developed. Chart 8 The RTW Program has clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Strongly Agree <strong>DRAFT</strong> Somewhat Agree Unknown Whole Audience Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Situational assessment District of Kitimat 11
Page 1: DISTRICT OF KITIMAT SITUATIONAL ASS
Page 4 and 5: This program is a non profit initia
Page 6 and 7: More and more employers were being
Page 8 and 9: Figure 1 Key Research: The Situatio
Page 10 and 11: Figure 2 Strong Commitment/RTW Poli
Page 12 and 13: Figure 3 RTW/AccommodATion Policy (
Page 16 and 17: Summary: In keeping with the leadin
Page 18 and 19: Figure 4 Injury Reporting Procedure
Page 20 and 21: Observations: 1) 96% of respondents
Page 22 and 23: Summary: The responses indicate tha
Page 24 and 25: 3. Early Contact / Intervention An
Page 26 and 27: 3) Over 50% of the respondents did
Page 28 and 29: Figure 6 Cooperative RTW Responsibi
Page 30 and 31: 1) Almost 50% of the respondents ar
Page 32 and 33: Summary: In this attribute, the unk
Page 34 and 35: 5. Attitudinal Barriers The negativ
Page 36 and 37: 3) 73% of respondents believe that
Page 38 and 39: Summary: It appears that many of th
Page 40 and 41: O 1 2 C 6. Transfer of Medical Info
Page 42 and 43: Summary: There is a good understand
Page 44 and 45: 7. Linking Primary and Secondary Pr
Page 46 and 47: 3) 75% of respondents do not know w
Page 48 and 49: 8. Utilization of Disability Preven
Page 50 and 51: 3) This may be a perception that ca
Page 52 and 53: 7) Although 67% (chart 42) agreed t
Page 54 and 55: Figure 11 Compliance with Human Rig
Page 56 and 57: 1) Almost three quarters of the res
Page 58 and 59: Figure 12 Mobilization of RTW Leade
Page 60 and 61: 1) It would be expected that the em
Page 62 and 63: Figure 13 Internal Dispute Resoluti
Page 64 and 65:
Figure 14 RTW Evaluation Attribute
Page 66 and 67:
1) The majority of respondents did
Page 68 and 69:
OVERALL SUMMARY The situational ass
Page 70 and 71:
OVERALL RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Educate
show all

KITIMAT DRAFT Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?