Treatment of Sex Offenders

More documents

Recommendations

Info

40 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger Craig, L. A., Beech, A. R., & Browne, K. D. (2006a). Cross validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21 (5), 1–22. Craig, L. A., Beech, A. R., & Browne, K. D. (2006b). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of sex offender risk assessment measures on UK a samples: A cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 scales. Sex offender treatment , 1 , 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment. org/14.0.html Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., Stringer, I., & Beech, A. (2004). Limitations in actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: A methodological note. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 6 , 16–32. Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., & Beech, A. R. (2008). Assessing risk in sex offenders: A practitioner’s guide . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son. Craig, L. A., Dixon, L., & Gannon, T. A. (2013). What works in offender rehabilitation: An evidenced based approach to assessment and treatment . Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester. Craig, L. A., Thornton, D., Beech, A., & Browne, K. D. (2007). The relationship of statistical and psychological risk markers to sexual reconviction in child molesters. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 34 (3), 314–329. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243 (4899), 1668–1674. de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., van Beek, D., & Mead, G. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28 , 235–251. Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. Ducro, C., & Pham, T. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18 , 15–26. doi: 10.1177/107906320601800102 . East, N. (1949). Society and the criminal . London: H.M.S.O. East, W. N., & Hubert, W. H. (1939). Psychological treatment of crime . HMSO, London. Eher, R., Matthes, A., Schilling, F., Haubner-MacLean, T., & Rettenberger, M. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24 , 5–28. doi: 10.1177/1079063211403164 . Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., Gaunersdorfer, K., Haubner-MacLean, T., Matthes, A., Schilling, F., & Mokros, A. (2013). Über die Treffsicherheit der standardisierten Risikoeinschätzungsverahren Static-99 und Stable-2007 bei aus einer Sicherungsmaßnahme entlassenen Sexualstraftätern [On the accuracy of the standardized risk assessment procedures Static-99 and Stable-2007 for sexual offenders released from detention]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie , 7 , 264–272. doi: 10.1007/s11757-013-0212-9 Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the risk society . Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. Ernits, V. (1922). Rev internat contre l’alcoolisme, 4 , 178. Falshaw, L. (2002). Assessing reconviction, re-offending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders . Paper presented at the eleventh annual conference of the division of forensic psychology, Manchester, April 2002. Firestone, P., Bradford, J. M., McCoy, M., Greenberg, D. M., Larose, M. R., & Curry, S. (1999). Prediction of recidivism in incest offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14 , 511–531. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1930). 500 criminal careers . Philadelphia, PA: Alfred A Knopf Press. Grove, W. M. (2005). Clinical versus statistical prediction: The contribution of Paul E. Meehl. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61 (10), 1233–1243. Gore, K. S. (2007). Adjusted actuarial assessment of sex offenders: The impact of clinical overrides on predictive accuracy. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68 (07), 4824B. UMI No. 3274898. Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2 , 293–323. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293 .
2 A Brief History of Sexual Offender Risk Assessment 41 Grove, W. M., & Lloyd, M. (2006). Meehl’s contribution to clinical versus statistical prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115 , 192–194. Grubin, D. (1998). Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk. Home Offi ce Research Development and Statistics Directorate Research Findings, Police Research Series, Paper 99. Haag, A. M. (2005). Do psychological interventions impact on actuarial measures: An analysis of the predictive validity of the Static-99 and Static-2002 on a re-conviction measure of sexual recidivism. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66 (08), 4531B. UMI No. NR05662. Hannah-Moffat, K., & Shaw, M. (2001). Taking risks: Incorporating gender and culture into the classification and assessment of federally sentenced women in Canada . Ottawa, ON: Status of Women Canada. Hanson, R. K. (1997a). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 1997-04) . Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Hanson, R. K. (1997b). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 1997-04) . Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Hanson, R. K. (2001) Age and sexual recidivism: A comparison of rapists and child molesters. (Cat No.: JS42-96/2001). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. http://www.sgc.gc.ca/ EPub/Corr/eAge200101/eAge200101.htm Hanson, R. K. (2007, March). How should risk assessments for sexual offenders be conducted ? Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Forensic Psychiatry Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 13 , 105–122. Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36 , 865–891. doi: 10.1177/0093854809338545 . Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66 , 348–362. Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27 , 6–35. doi: 10.1177/0093854800 027001002 . Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T. L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Corrections research user report 2007-05) . Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/crp2007-05-en.pdf. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated metaanalysis (Corrections Research, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada, Ottawa, Canada). Retrieved April 6, 2005, from http://www .psepc-sppcc.gc.ca/publications/corrections/pdf/200402_e.pdf Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2007). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessment for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis (Corrections Research User Report No. 2007-01) . Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21 , 1–21. doi: 10.1037/a0014421 . Hanson, R. K., & Scott, H. (1995). Assessing perspective-taking among sexual offenders, nonsexual criminal and non-offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7 , 259–277. Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24 , 119–136. doi: 10.1023/A:1005482921333 . Hare, R. (1991). Manual for the psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R) . Toronto, ON: MultiHealth Systems, Inc. Hart, H. (1924). Predicting parole success. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1 , 405–414. Harris, A. J. R., & Hanson, R. K. (2010). Clinical, actuarial, and dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Why do things keep changing? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16 , 296–310. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2010.494772. .
Page 1 and 2: D. Richard Laws · William O'Donohu
Page 4 and 5: D. Richard Laws • William O’Don
Page 6 and 7: Pref ace It can be wise for a field
Page 8 and 9: Contents 1 Problems in the Classifi
Page 10 and 11: Contributors Adam J. Carter , Ph.D.
Page 12 and 13: Chapter 1 Problems in the Classific
Page 14 and 15: 1 Problems in the Classification an
Page 30 and 31: 20 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger O
Page 32 and 33: Table 2.1 Glueck and Glueck’s ( 1
Page 34 and 35: 24 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger w
Page 36 and 37: 26 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger L
Page 38 and 39: 28 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger T
Page 42 and 43: 32 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger b
Page 44 and 45: 34 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger (
Page 46 and 47: 36 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger r
Page 48 and 49: 38 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger v
Page 52 and 53: 42 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger H
Page 56 and 57: 46 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. at reducin
Page 58 and 59: 48 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Certain pa
Page 60 and 61: 50 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. these cons
Page 62 and 63: 52 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. to other m
Page 64 and 65: 54 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Developing
Page 66 and 67: 56 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. ( d = 0.67
Page 68 and 69: 58 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. justified
Page 70 and 71: 60 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. (any convi
Page 72 and 73: 62 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. press ) fo
Page 74 and 75: 64 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Importantl
Page 76 and 77: 66 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. United Sta
Page 78 and 79: 68 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. offenders
Page 80 and 81: 70 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. A good def
Page 82 and 83: 72 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Conclusion
Page 84 and 85: 74 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Babchishin
Page 86 and 87: 76 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Grove, W.
Page 88 and 89: 78 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Hilton, N.
Page 90 and 91: 80 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Pedneault,
Page 92 and 93: Chapter 4 Risk Formulation: The New
Page 94 and 95: 4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
Page 100 and 101:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
108 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner Conv
Page 118 and 119:
110 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner Circ
Page 120 and 121:
112 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner Visu
Page 122 and 123:
114 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner gyne
Page 124 and 125:
116 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner View
Page 126 and 127:
118 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner comp
Page 128 and 129:
120 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner stim
Page 130 and 131:
122 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner sign
Page 132 and 133:
124 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner In t
Page 134 and 135:
126 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner sexu
Page 136 and 137:
128 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner Babc
Page 138 and 139:
130 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner King
Page 140 and 141:
Chapter 6 Polygraph Testing of Sex
Page 142 and 143:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Chapter 7 The Strengths of Treatmen
Page 166 and 167:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Chapter 8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk
Page 184 and 185:
8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Chapter 9 Early Detection and Inter
Page 200 and 201:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Chapter 10 Community Control of Sex
Page 232 and 233:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
244 K.N. Daly SVP laws were passed
Page 252 and 253:
246 K.N. Daly 750. 338 b. The condu
Page 254 and 255:
248 K.N. Daly had largely been a re
Page 256 and 257:
250 K.N. Daly By contrast successfu
Page 258 and 259:
252 K.N. Daly In reaching his concu
Page 260 and 261:
254 K.N. Daly with no accompanying
Page 262 and 263:
256 K.N. Daly legal significance of
Page 264 and 265:
258 K.N. Daly law which has caused
Page 266 and 267:
Chapter 12 The Shortcomings of Sexu
Page 268 and 269:
12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
282 P. Lussier practitioners have r
Page 288 and 289:
284 P. Lussier refers to someone vo
Page 290 and 291:
286 P. Lussier Morton, & Harris, 20
Page 292 and 293:
288 P. Lussier The authors compared
Page 294 and 295:
290 P. Lussier relatively stable ch
Page 296 and 297:
292 P. Lussier Offending Trajectori
Page 298 and 299:
294 P. Lussier impact or a limited
Page 300 and 301:
296 P. Lussier especially those han
Page 302 and 303:
298 P. Lussier the role of social f
Page 304 and 305:
300 P. Lussier Mulvey, 2009 ). In f
Page 306 and 307:
302 P. Lussier opportunities and re
Page 308 and 309:
304 P. Lussier Peer Influence While
Page 310 and 311:
306 P. Lussier of offending. For ex
Page 312 and 313:
308 P. Lussier Aging, self-identity
Page 314 and 315:
310 P. Lussier & Rice, 2007 ; Lussi
Page 316 and 317:
312 P. Lussier Individual and Socia
Page 318 and 319:
314 P. Lussier als subject to incre
Page 320 and 321:
316 P. Lussier opportunities extent
Page 322 and 323:
318 P. Lussier Corrado, R. R., Cohe
Page 324 and 325:
320 P. Lussier Lussier, P., & Blokl
Page 326 and 327:
322 P. Lussier Stouthamer-Loeber, M
Page 328 and 329:
324 J. Tabachnick et al. community
Page 330 and 331:
326 J. Tabachnick et al. Fig. 14.1
Page 332 and 333:
328 J. Tabachnick et al. The Need f
Page 334 and 335:
330 J. Tabachnick et al. The CDC de
Page 336 and 337:
332 J. Tabachnick et al. Practical
Page 338 and 339:
334 J. Tabachnick et al. (e.g., tru
Page 340 and 341:
336 J. Tabachnick et al. Unfortunat
Page 342 and 343:
338 J. Tabachnick et al. Banyard, V
Page 344 and 345:
340 J. Tabachnick et al. Humphries,
Page 346 and 347:
342 J. Tabachnick et al. Tharp, A.
Page 348 and 349:
344 Index Adolescent sexually abusi
Page 350 and 351:
346 Index Offense-supportive attitu
Page 352:
348 Index Structured assessment of
show all

Treatment of Sex Offenders

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?