06.09.2016 Views

Treatment of Sex Offenders

RvRk1r

RvRk1r

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7<br />

The Strengths <strong>of</strong> <strong>Treatment</strong> for <strong>Sex</strong>ual<br />

Offending<br />

Adam J. Carter and Ruth E. Mann<br />

Introduction<br />

The term “sex <strong>of</strong>fender treatment” is generally used to describe psychological<br />

programmes delivered to groups <strong>of</strong> people convicted <strong>of</strong> sexual <strong>of</strong>fences, in either<br />

custody and community settings, for the tertiary prevention <strong>of</strong> sexual recidivism.<br />

Somewhat less commonly, the term is used to describe other approaches such as<br />

medication to reduce an individual’s level <strong>of</strong> sexual arousal (e.g. Beech & Harkins,<br />

2012 : Lösel & Schmucker, 2005 ).<br />

The term treatment, used in the context <strong>of</strong> rehabilitative efforts with people convicted<br />

<strong>of</strong> sexual <strong>of</strong>fences, arguably misrepresents what rehabilitation is both able to<br />

achieve and aims to do. To a lay person, the term treatment could imply that we<br />

know how to reduce sexual recidivism with perpetrators <strong>of</strong> sexual crimes, suggesting<br />

that we can as a matter <strong>of</strong> course identify and address the s ymptoms <strong>of</strong> sexual<br />

<strong>of</strong>fending and take action to ameliorate these symptoms in the same way it can be<br />

possible to administer medical care for an illness. This term also suggests that if<br />

people haven’t received any treatment then they are untreated and will continue to<br />

<strong>of</strong>fend. However, the extremely low recidivism rates (e.g. 2.2 % sexual recidivism<br />

over 2 years; Barnett, Wakeling, & Howard, 2010 ) for this type <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence suggests<br />

otherwise: it seems that, even taking into account the problem <strong>of</strong> detecting all incidences<br />

<strong>of</strong> sexual <strong>of</strong>fending, most people with sex <strong>of</strong>fence convictions are likely to<br />

desist from further <strong>of</strong>fending whether or not they are treated. Another issue with<br />

using the term “treatment” is that it risks failing to acknowledge the active role <strong>of</strong><br />

the treatment participant in the process <strong>of</strong> change. As the field <strong>of</strong> desistance research<br />

A. J. Carter , Ph.D. (*) • R. E. Mann , Ph.D.<br />

National Offender Management Service , Clive House, 70 Petty France ,<br />

London SW1H 9EX , UK<br />

e-mail: adam.carter@noms.gsi.gov.uk<br />

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016<br />

D.R. Laws, W. O’Donohue (eds.), <strong>Treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>Offenders</strong>,<br />

DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-25868-3_7<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!