Devonshire October November 16
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Independent Financial Adviser<br />
Celebrating 24 years of Business in East Devon<br />
MANAGING your MONEY<br />
Helen has been advising clients<br />
in the East Devon area for the<br />
past 24 years and specialises in<br />
the provision of retirement and<br />
investment advice.<br />
State Pension<br />
- under fire again!<br />
To find out more about her practice,<br />
you can view her company website<br />
at: richmondindependent.co.uk<br />
01395 512<strong>16</strong>6<br />
Helen Mulvaney<br />
BA (Hons), Dip M, DipPFS<br />
Proprietor of Richmond Independent<br />
Back in the early summer, Lord<br />
Adair Turner, former chairman of<br />
the FSA and Pensions Commission,<br />
proposed raising the state pension<br />
age to 70 by 2030. This would affect<br />
those workers who are currently<br />
aged 56 and under and who would<br />
need to work even longer before<br />
gaining entitlement to their state<br />
pension. Lord Turner was speaking<br />
at a private event and suggested<br />
proposals for introducing earlier<br />
access for those in physically<br />
demanding jobs or those on low<br />
incomes.<br />
changes are<br />
probably inevitable<br />
and we might even<br />
find that it's not<br />
just state pension<br />
age that is affected<br />
Currently, the timetable for raising<br />
the state pension age eligibility<br />
stops at age 68. We've reported<br />
in earlier articles that the major<br />
reason for changing the state<br />
pension age eligibility is the current<br />
cost of state pensions.<br />
The new<br />
"flat-rate state pension" which was<br />
recently introduced will eventually<br />
put a cap on the amount of state<br />
pension entitlement and workers<br />
will no longer be able to build up the<br />
generous state pensions which have<br />
been built up through contractingin.<br />
The long term costs of the state<br />
pension are already considered<br />
unsustainable with the government<br />
estimating pension costs at around<br />
8.5% of GDP*. Recently, Ross Altman,<br />
the former pension minister, caused<br />
a great deal of consternation when<br />
she suggested that the expensive<br />
triple lock guarantee should be<br />
dropped by government to save<br />
billions of pounds. Pensioners have<br />
been particularly badly affected by<br />
the financial crisis of 2008 whereby<br />
extremely low interest rates have<br />
had a devastating effect on annuity<br />
rates and also on deposit accounts,<br />
forcing some pensioners to take<br />
much more risk than they want<br />
to with both their pensions and<br />
investment/savings. Losing the<br />
triple lock would be yet another<br />
blow and would make life very hard<br />
for many elderly pensioners on low<br />
incomes.<br />
In August, a report of the<br />
interdepartmental group on Fuller<br />
Working Lives stated that the<br />
retirement age may need to be<br />
increased and I understand that<br />
John Cridland was appointed to chair<br />
a new governmental review into the<br />
State Pension Age by Ross Altman<br />
back in March. Individuals, charities,<br />
businesses, research groups and all<br />
other interested stakeholders are<br />
invited to share their views on the<br />
State Pension age by emailing spa.<br />
review@dwp.gsi.gov.uk.<br />
long term costs of<br />
the state pension<br />
are already<br />
considered<br />
unsustainable<br />
So it appears that changes are<br />
probably inevitable and we might<br />
even find that it's not just state<br />
pension age that is affected but new<br />
changes might be introduced which<br />
will consider people's wealth, job<br />
or life expectancy. This situation, I<br />
If you would like to read more of<br />
Helen's articles visit her website:<br />
www.richmondindependent.co.uk<br />
think, is bound to cause controversy<br />
on the grounds of fairness and this<br />
would be both contentious and<br />
complicated to administer.<br />
WASPI<br />
(Women Against State<br />
Pension Inequality) has criticised<br />
successive governments for failing<br />
to properly inform those who will<br />
be affected by State Pension Age<br />
changes. So, once again, there may<br />
be changes affecting those who are<br />
creeping closer to retirement and<br />
it would appear that you'll need<br />
to work hard to ensure that you<br />
understand the changes and how<br />
they might affect you. After all, for<br />
many people, the state pension will<br />
form the basic building blocks of<br />
their retirement planning and to<br />
find that everything has changed<br />
significantly could mean great<br />
financial difficulty, probably at time<br />
when you're least likely to be able to<br />
make changes to deal with it.<br />
Please contact Helen Mulvaney of<br />
Richmond Independent for further<br />
details. Tel 01395 512<strong>16</strong>6<br />
Source * Government Green paper<br />
Richmond Independent is a trading name of<br />
Investment & Financial Solutions Partnership<br />
LLP which is authorised and regulated by the<br />
Financial Conduct Authority<br />
114<br />
Countryside, History, Walks, the Arts, Events & all things Devon at: DEVONSHIRE magazine.co.uk