02.10.2016 Views

Annals of Oncology

ESMO-2016-abstracts

ESMO-2016-abstracts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

abstracts<br />

<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong><br />

Astellas. K. Chi: Has received honorarium and research funding from Janssen and<br />

Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />

61P<br />

Frequency and abundance <strong>of</strong> plasma T790M mutation<br />

associated with failure patterns <strong>of</strong> EGFR-mutant NSCLC<br />

treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors<br />

60P<br />

Circulating free tumour-derived DNA (ctDNA) to detect EGFR<br />

mutation in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC):<br />

French subset analysis <strong>of</strong> the ASSESS study<br />

M.G. Denis 1 , M.P. Lafourcade 2 , G. Le Garff 3 , C. Dayen 4 , L. Falchero 5 , P. Thomas 6 ,<br />

C. Locher 7 , G. Fraboulet 8 , G. Oliviero 9 , M. Licour 10 , N. Normanno 11 , M. Reck 12 ,<br />

O. Molinier 13<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Biochemistry, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France, 2 Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Pneumology, CH d’Angoulême, Angouleme, France, 3 Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Pneumology, Hopital Yves Le Foll, St. Brieuc, France, 4 Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier St. Quentin, St Quentin, France, 5 Pneumologie et<br />

Cancérologie Thoracique, CH Villefranche-Sur-Saône, Villefranche-sur-Saône<br />

Cedex, France, 6 Department <strong>of</strong> Pneumology, CHI Alpes du Sud - Site de Gap,<br />

Gap, France, 7 Department <strong>of</strong> Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Général Meaux,<br />

Meaux, France, 8 Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong>, Hopital René Dubos, Pontoise, France,<br />

9 Department <strong>of</strong> Pneumology, CH de Longjumeau, Longjumeau, France,<br />

10 Department <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology and Biometry, AstraZeneca, Courbevoie, France,<br />

11 Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – I.R.C.C.S -<br />

Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy, 12 Department <strong>of</strong> Thoracic <strong>Oncology</strong>,<br />

LungenClinic Grosshansdorf GmbH, Grosshansdorf, Germany, 13 Centre de<br />

Coordination en Cancérologie, Centre Hospitalier Du Mans, Le Mans, France<br />

Background: ASSESS (non-interventional diagnostic study NCT01785888) assessed<br />

the concordance <strong>of</strong> EGFR mutation status in tumour samples and plasma ctDNA in<br />

pts with aNSCLC in Europe and Japan. Subset data for pts from France are presented.<br />

Methods: Pts: stage IIIA/B/IV chemo-/TKI-naïve NSCLC. Primary endpoint: EGFR<br />

mutation status concordance between matched plasma and tumour samples. Tumour<br />

testing was performed locally as per local practice; plasma testing was centralised.<br />

ctDNA was extracted using the PureLink Virus Kit on an iPrep Purification Instrument<br />

(Life Technologies) and EGFR mutations detected via the approved Therascreen EGFR<br />

RGQ kit (Qiagen).<br />

Results: Of 1311 enrolled pts, 145 were from France (mean age 64 years, 64% male,<br />

83% ever-smokers). Most samples were collected from primary tumours (81%);<br />

collection was mostly via bronchoscopy (38%) and image-guided core biopsy (19%). Of<br />

130 pts with available tissue, 126 were evaluable for EGFR; activating mutations were<br />

found in 13 (EGFR mutation frequency 10%). 10 pts tested positive for EGFR<br />

mutations in plasma (EGFR mutation frequency 7%). Mutation rate was significantly<br />

higher in never- vs ever-smokers (stepwise logistic regression: tumour p < 0.0001;<br />

plasma p = 0.0008). Mutation status concordance could be determined for 126 (95.2%)<br />

pts. Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> plasma testing was 61.5%. Of the 113 pts EGFR mutation-negative in<br />

tissue, one tested plasma-positive; reanalysis via 2 different techniques confirmed the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> L858R, indicating a tissue false-negative result, and not a plasma<br />

false-positive. Sensitivity was thus adjusted to 64.3% (9/14) and specificity to 100%<br />

(112/112). One pt with a non-contributive tissue test (bone metastasis) was<br />

plasma-positive.<br />

Conclusions: These real-world data confirm ctDNA as a powerful alternative sample<br />

for EGFR mutation analysis in aNSCLC.<br />

Table: 60P Matched tissue/cytology samples (N = 126)<br />

Unadjusted parameters n/N % Exact 95% confidence interval<br />

Concordance 120/126 95.2 89.9, 98.2<br />

Sensitivity 8/13 61.5 31.6, 86.1<br />

Specificity 112/113 99.1 95.2, 100.0<br />

Positive-predictive value 8/9 88.9 51.8, 99.7<br />

Negative-predictive value 112/117 95.7 90.3, 98.6<br />

Clinical trial identification: NCT01785888<br />

Legal entity responsible for the study: AstraZeneca<br />

Funding: AstraZeneca<br />

Disclosure: M.G. Denis: Grants/Research support/consultant: AstraZeneca, Qiagen,<br />

Roche Pharma, and Boehringer Ingelheim. G. Le Garff: Clin. Trial: Lilly, Roche,<br />

AstraZeneca. All financial contributions except MUTACT study (AZ) paid by clinical<br />

research unit. Board: Novartis. Inv. to Congress: AZ (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!