Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
abstracts<br />
141P<br />
Identification <strong>of</strong> baseline parameters associated with the<br />
inter-individual variability in cytidine deaminase serum activity,<br />
a key enzyme in the metabolism <strong>of</strong> pyrimidine analogue<br />
R. Cohen 1 , L-H. Preta 2 , A. Bessone 3 , C. Narjoz 3 , I. Nicolis 4 , D. Desaulle 4 ,<br />
E. Curis 4 , A. Cessot 1 , O. Huillard 1 , A. Thomas-Schoemann 2 , M. Vidal 2 ,<br />
F. Goldwasser 5 , J. Alexandre 5 , B. Blanchet 6<br />
1 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Paris Descartes University, Cochin - Port Royal Hospital,<br />
AP-HP, Paris, France, 2 Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Toxicology and Pharmacology, Paris<br />
Descartes University, Cochin - Port Royal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France, 3 Service<br />
de Biochimie, Hopital European George Pompidou, Paris, France, 4 Laboratoire de<br />
Biomathématiques et Informatique, Département de Santé Publique et<br />
Biostatistiques, EA 4064, Faculté de Pharmacie Université Paris Descartes, Paris,<br />
France, 5 Department <strong>of</strong> Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes<br />
University, APHP, CARPEM, CERTIM, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, 6 Laboratory<br />
<strong>of</strong> Toxicology and Pharmacology, Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary<br />
Study Group (CERTIM), Paris Descartes University, Cochin - Port Royal Hospital,<br />
AP-HP, Paris, France<br />
Background: Cytidine deaminase (CDA) catabolizes gemcitabine and cytosine<br />
arabinoside and its serum activity (CDA-A) has been associated with efficacy and<br />
toxicity <strong>of</strong> both treatments. CDA is mainly produced by hepatocytes and neutrophils.<br />
Our objective was to identify pretreatment patients (pts) characteristics that may<br />
contribute to the large inter-individual variability in CDA-A.<br />
Methods: From December 2014 to November 2015, all consecutive pts were<br />
prospectively included into this single-center study. CDA-A in serum was assayed<br />
using a standardized spectrophotometric method. Biological, clinical characteristics<br />
and 5 common single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CDA gene (-451g > a, -92a > g,<br />
-33delc, 79a > c, 435t > c) were analyzed according to pretreatment CDA-A. Written<br />
consent was obtained from all patients. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis<br />
were performed on log-transformed CDA-A with significance level <strong>of</strong> 0.05.<br />
Results: 275 pts (male: 61%) were analyzed. Median age was 66.2 years. Main primary<br />
tumor locations were lung (19%), prostate (11%) and urinary tract (10%). Median<br />
CDA-A was 4.08 u/mg protein (range 1.53-15.49). The inter-individual variability in<br />
CDA-A was large (43%). 49 pts (18%) had high CDA-A (> 6 U/mg). In univariate<br />
analysis, high CDA-A was associated with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (p < 10 −16 ),<br />
C-reactive protein level (p = 10 −7 ), malnutrition (p = .014), altered ECOG performance<br />
status (p = .0003) and -33delC genotype (p = .0152). In multivariate analysis, only ANC<br />
was independently associated with CDA-A (p < 10 −9 ). Finally, this correlation between<br />
CDA-A and ANC (Pearson coefficient >0.5) was also observed over the treatment course<br />
with gemcitabine (at least 3 sampling occasions per patient; n = 6).<br />
Conclusions: Our results show for the first time an association between the<br />
pretherapeutic number <strong>of</strong> neutrophils and CDA activity, suggesting a CDA release<br />
from neutrophils. However, it explains only a small part <strong>of</strong> inter-individual variability<br />
in CDA-A. Therefore, CDA-A assessment in serum remains <strong>of</strong> interest to identify pts<br />
with high risk <strong>of</strong> toxicity or low efficacy under pyrimidine analogues.<br />
Legal entity responsible for the study: Paris Descartes University, Cochin - Port Royal<br />
Hospital, AP-HP<br />
Funding: None<br />
Disclosure: F. Goldwasser: Honoraria: Fresenius Kabi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer,<br />
Pfizer Consulting or Advisory Role: Fresenius Kabi, Bayer. Travel, accomodation:<br />
Bayer, Novartis, AsrtaZeneca, Roche Glycart. All other authors have declared no<br />
conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
142P<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> an ELISA to detect tumor-associated antigen<br />
tNASP in urine<br />
O. Alekseev 1 , J. Vaughn 2 , B. Taylor 2 , L. Barba 2 , J. Greiner 2 , C. Dickson 2 ,<br />
C. Anderson 2 , J. Fullmer 2 , Z. Vaskalis 3<br />
1 Physiology and Pathophysiology, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA,<br />
2 Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA, 3 School <strong>of</strong> Osteopathic Medicine,<br />
Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA<br />
Background: Tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) are proteins that elicit a humoral<br />
immune response when their expression is elevated in tumor progression. tNASP is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> two splice variants <strong>of</strong> Nuclear Autoantigenic Sperm Protein. In addition to its<br />
normal testicular expression, it is also aberrantly expressed in cancer cells. We have<br />
previously demonstrated that immunohistochemical detection <strong>of</strong> tNASP has high<br />
diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in ovarian cancer. We have discovered that tNASP<br />
is also aberrantly expressed in prostate cancer cells and tissues. In the current study, we<br />
developed an ELISA to detect specific anti-tNASP serum antibodies as well as tNASP<br />
protein in urine for early diagnosis <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer.<br />
Methods: tNASP protein expression was assayed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in<br />
prostate cancer biopsy samples from different disease stages, using affinity-purified goat<br />
anti-tNASP serum, which specifically recognizes only tNASP protein. A recombinant<br />
tNASP-specific fragment was used as bait to produce a standard curve for detection <strong>of</strong><br />
anti-tNASP antibodies by ELISA. Serum and urine samples from patients with prostate<br />
cancer, and otherwise healthy control patients, were obtained from the Tissue<br />
Procurement Facility <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Roswell Park<br />
Cancer Institute, and Fox Chase Cancer Center. Correlation between serum<br />
anti-tNASP antibody levels, urine tNASP protein level and Prostate Specific Antigen<br />
(PSA) was analyzed by Spearman’s coefficient.<br />
Results: ELISA measurements demonstrated a significant increase in tNASP protein<br />
levels in the urine <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer patients, as compared to control group urine.<br />
Spearman’s rank correlation demonstrated that the concentration <strong>of</strong> anti-tNASP<br />
antibodies and tNASP levels in urine co-varied with PSA levels. Urine tNASP protein<br />
was detected by ELISA with anti t-NASP antibody as bait, whereas anti-tNASP<br />
antibodies were not detected in urine samples.<br />
Conclusions: Combined detection <strong>of</strong> serum anti-tNASP antibody and urine tNASP<br />
protein could be used for diagnosis <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer and has the potential to improve<br />
early diagnostic confidence.<br />
Legal entity responsible for the study: This study was supported by Campbell<br />
University School <strong>of</strong> Osteopathic Medicine, North Carolina, 27506, USA. Associate<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Oleg Alekseev, MD, PhD is a principal investigator on this project.<br />
Funding: This study was funded by School <strong>of</strong> Osteopathic Medicine <strong>of</strong> the Campbell<br />
University (CUSOM). Principal investigator Dr. Oleg Alekseev is a full-time faculty in<br />
CUSOM and research activity is his duty along with teaching.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
143TiP<br />
<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong><br />
A biomarker-guided first-in-human trial <strong>of</strong> subcutaneous<br />
ALM201 in patients with solid tumours<br />
A. El-Helali 1 , R. Plummer 2 , G. Jayson 3 , V. Coyle 1 , C. Rogers 3 ,M.D’Arcangelo 2 ,D.<br />
M. Graham 1 ,Y.Drew 2 , A. Clamp 3 , J. McCann 4 , A. McCavigan 5 , L. Knight 5 ,<br />
N. McCabe 5 , K. Keating 5 ,R.Dyer 6 , T. Harrison 6 , P. Harkin 5 , T. Robson 7 ,<br />
R. Kennedy 1 , R. Wilson 1<br />
1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast,<br />
UK, 2 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Sir Bobby Robson Cancer Trials Research Centre,<br />
Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 3 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>,<br />
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK, 4 Cancer Research Forum,<br />
Northern Ireland Cancer Research Consumers Forum, Belfast, UK, 5 Almac<br />
Diagnostics, Almac Group, Craigavon, UK, 6 Almac Discovery, Almac Group,<br />
Craigavon, UK, 7 School <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK<br />
Background: ALM201 is a 23-amino acid peptide derived from FKPB-L, a human<br />
endogenous protein with inherent anti-angiogenic activity. ALM201 is active after<br />
internalisation via CD44 into the cell, where it binds to tubulin and prevents<br />
microtubule formation. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that ALM201 is a potent<br />
inhibitor <strong>of</strong> migration, invasion and new blood vessel formation but has no effects on<br />
cell cycle or proliferation. It was very well tolerated in pre-clinical toxicology studies.<br />
High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is a disease <strong>of</strong> clinical unmet need, and the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> anti-angiogenics in HGSOC remains a critical area <strong>of</strong> investigation. The 63-gene<br />
AADx biomarker (Gourley et al, ASCO 2014) identifies a sub-group <strong>of</strong> HGSOC with<br />
significant up-regulation <strong>of</strong> angiogenic genes and a worse outcome from conventional<br />
platinum-based chemotherapy. In our trial, we wish to investigate ALM201 in this<br />
AADx-selected “Angiogenic” HGSOC population.<br />
Trial design: This phase I trial employs an accelerated dose-escalation design with<br />
single patient cohorts, later moving to a standard 3 + 3 design, and will explore 6 dose<br />
levels. Patients will have histologically confirmed advanced solid tumours, in which use<br />
<strong>of</strong> an antiangiogenic is reasonable. The dose expansion cohort will recruit 36 patients<br />
and treat them with the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). They will have relapsed<br />
advanced HGSOC with a tumour classified as angiogenic by the AADx signature. This<br />
companion diagnostic will utilise a pre-enrolment FFPE tumour sample. Patients will<br />
receive ALM201 once daily as a subcutaneous injection on days 1-5, 8-12, and 15-19<br />
every 21 days. The primary objectives are to determine the safety, tolerability and<br />
RP2D <strong>of</strong> ALM201. Secondary objectives are to determine the pharmacokinetic pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
and preliminary antitumor activity <strong>of</strong> ALM201 overall and in the biomarker-selected<br />
HGSOC population. Exploratory objectives are to assess relevant tumour biomarkers<br />
and the pharmacodynamic activity <strong>of</strong> ALM201. This trial commenced recruitment in<br />
July 2015, with 10 patients currently enrolled across the first 6 dose levels.<br />
Clinical trial identification: EudraCT No: 2014-001175-31<br />
Legal entity responsible for the study: Almac Discovery<br />
Funding: Almac Discovery<br />
Disclosure: V. Coyle: Research funding and site PI: Onyx/Amgen. Travel and<br />
accommodation expense covered by san<strong>of</strong>i and BM. C. Rogers: consulting/advisory<br />
role for AstraZeneca. Y. Drew: Honoraria: AstraZeneca and Clovis <strong>Oncology</strong>.<br />
Consulting and advisory role: AstraZeneca and Clovis <strong>Oncology</strong>. A. Clamp: Consulting<br />
and advisory role: Astra Zeneca. Speakers Bureau: Astra Zeneca and Roche. Research<br />
funding: Astra Zeneca, Clovis <strong>Oncology</strong>, Array Biopharma, AB bioscience and<br />
Amgen. A. McCavigan: Employee <strong>of</strong> Almac Diagnostics. L. Knight: Employee <strong>of</strong> Almac<br />
group. N. McCabe: Employee <strong>of</strong> Almac group. Research funding from ALmac<br />
group. K. Keating: Employed by Almac diagnostics. Research funded by Almac<br />
Diagnostics. Hold patent and royalties in ALmac diagnostics. Travel and expenses<br />
covered by Almac Diagnostics. R. Dyer: Almac discovery employee, holds patent/<br />
royalties through Almac Discovery. Travel/accommodation expenses covered by Almac<br />
Discovery. T. Harrison: Employee <strong>of</strong> Almac Discovery, research funded by Almac<br />
Discovery. P. Harkin: Employment: Almac Diagnostics. Research funded by Almac<br />
Diagnostics. Patent and royalties held and received by Almac Diagnostics. T. Robson:<br />
Research funding: Almac Discovery. Patent/royalties held with Almac<br />
Discovery. R. Kennedy: Employee <strong>of</strong> Almac Diagnostics. Patent and royalties held with<br />
Almac Diagnostics. R. Wilson: Honoraria, Advisory roles and travel expenses from<br />
San<strong>of</strong>i, Merck Serono, Amgen and Sirtex. All other authors have declared no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
vi42 | abstracts Volume 27 | Supplement 6 | 2016