INTRODUCTION
ISTA305ymnH
ISTA305ymnH
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
diversity of interests among the<br />
Member States has started to put<br />
some challenges in terms of<br />
cooperation. Among these<br />
challenges is the project Energy<br />
Union.<br />
For example, many states in Central<br />
Europe such as Poland, still depend<br />
on inefficient coal-fired power<br />
plants. About 90% of Polish<br />
electricity (and 70% of national<br />
carbon emissions) comes from coal<br />
fired power plants (IEA, 2011,<br />
Ottery, 2013). These plants produce<br />
a higher carbon footprint and lower<br />
power marginal product than<br />
natural gas plants, nuclear or hydro<br />
power in other countries. On the<br />
contrary, Germany, as already<br />
mentioned, has an economy and a<br />
far superior electrical network with<br />
a strict attention to renewable<br />
energy.<br />
Although an interconnection plan,<br />
would reduce the need of coal and<br />
allow the transmission of energy<br />
from more efficient central ester,<br />
such integration presents several<br />
problems.<br />
In cases like this, the countries with<br />
backward technology such as<br />
Poland, may be more interested in<br />
economic terms, to remain<br />
disconnected from the plane of<br />
Energy Union.<br />
The plan would see Poland reduce<br />
its production of coal and rely on<br />
electrical power plants of its<br />
neighbors. To the Polish people this<br />
could be a benefit with lower<br />
energy costs and greater efficiency<br />
but at the expense of jobs in plants<br />
currently in use. Poland has 56 coalfired<br />
power plants that contribute<br />
collectively annual carbon emission<br />
of 152 megatons, making it difficult<br />
to adapt to the EU for emissions<br />
abatement plan (Ottery, 2013). In<br />
2012, the coal industry has<br />
contributed to the creation of over<br />
113,000 jobs, while the brown coal<br />
to more than 15,000 (EURACOAL,<br />
2013). The stringent carbon<br />
standards threaten the energy<br />
sector and the Polish economic<br />
vitality.<br />
Despite being geographically close<br />
to Poland, Germany has focused on<br />
renewable energy and the ability to<br />
share its energy production with<br />
Poland. Given the different<br />
ideologies of the countries on the<br />
concept of clean energy, Germany<br />
and Poland may not be able to<br />
easily reach a compromise on<br />
energy supply. It is possible that<br />
Germany insists on respect by<br />
Poland of strict environmental<br />
standards that could potentially<br />
harm its economy. At the same<br />
time, Poland could decide not to<br />
sacrifice his coal industry as it<br />
provides many jobs and income.<br />
In addition to these conflicting<br />
domestic policy objectives, the<br />
region is plagued by problems of<br />
trust between European states.<br />
Western countries still tend to have<br />
a questionable perception of the<br />
Eastern countries and their citizens.<br />
Sharing a critical resource like<br />
energy raises issues of trust<br />
between States at the time the<br />
business. While Germany might fear<br />
13