10.11.2016 Views

November 2016 Persecution Magazine (1 of 3)

World News

World News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cross in the Seal <strong>of</strong> Lehigh<br />

County, PA, Will Remain<br />

In another Freedom from Religion<br />

Foundation (FFRF) lawsuit to remove<br />

Christian symbols from the public eye, the<br />

atheist group has now targeted the cross in<br />

the seal <strong>of</strong> Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.<br />

The group had issued two prior letters <strong>of</strong><br />

complaint over the cross in the seal, and has<br />

now filed suit.<br />

According to a statement from the c<strong>of</strong>ounder<br />

<strong>of</strong> the atheist group, Annie Laurie<br />

Gaylor, “Lehigh County is not a Christian<br />

county; it should be equally welcoming to<br />

all its citizens regardless <strong>of</strong> their religion or<br />

their reject <strong>of</strong> religion.”<br />

Lehigh County <strong>of</strong>ficials have stated that<br />

the cross holds historical significance for<br />

the county and does not serve as an endorsement<br />

<strong>of</strong> religion.<br />

In addition, members <strong>of</strong> the public contacted<br />

the county board in support <strong>of</strong> keeping<br />

the cross in their county seal. The<br />

commissioners voted unanimously to retain<br />

the cross and to communicate this decision<br />

to the FRFF.<br />

PERSECU ION.org<br />

INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN<br />

Ten Commandments Monument<br />

Will Remain Outside Maryland<br />

Courthouse<br />

T<br />

his<br />

past March, Jeffrey Davis, a humanist<br />

who objected to a Ten Commandments<br />

monument outside <strong>of</strong> a Maryland courthouse,<br />

filed a federal lawsuit to have the monument<br />

removed. Davis filed the suit saying that he<br />

deemed the monument unconstitutional.<br />

The lawsuit stated, “Plaintiff believes that<br />

the monument represents only one particular<br />

religious point <strong>of</strong> view and therefore sends<br />

a message <strong>of</strong> exclusion to those who do not<br />

adhere to that particular religion (Christianity),<br />

in violation <strong>of</strong> the US Constitution. Plaintiff<br />

does not want to have exposure to the monument<br />

on government property in the future.”<br />

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a legal<br />

group defending the monument, filed a motion<br />

asking for the case to be dismissed. ADF’s<br />

motion reads, “His broad stroke recitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the elements <strong>of</strong> an Establishment Clause<br />

claim does not survive Van Orden, where the<br />

Supreme Court made abundantly clear that the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> a Ten Commandments monument<br />

identical to the one at issue here – indeed, one<br />

that, like here, was donated by the Eagles –<br />

on public lands is not itself a violation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Establishment Clause.”<br />

In August, Davis sent a letter to the US<br />

District Court stating his decision to drop the<br />

case against the monument, although he did<br />

not detail his reasoning and declined to speak<br />

to press about the decision.<br />

Newspaper Advertisement<br />

Rejected Over the Word<br />

“Christian”<br />

I<br />

n<br />

Tennessee, a local bookstore, Cedar<br />

Springs Christian Store, recently tried<br />

to place an advertisement in the Knoxville<br />

News Sentinel classified section. However,<br />

the Sentinel refused to print the ad saying<br />

that they deemed the ad <strong>of</strong>fensive for containing<br />

the word “Christian.”<br />

The advertisement read: “Store closing<br />

sale – Cedar Springs Christian Store –<br />

Clinton Highway location – All merchandise,<br />

fixtures, slat walls must go. Sale<br />

through August 13.” After seeing that their<br />

ad did not run on their requested days, the<br />

owner <strong>of</strong> the store made an inquiry to the<br />

paper. The owner states that the “ad did<br />

not run because it contained an <strong>of</strong>fensive<br />

word. I asked what that <strong>of</strong>fensive word<br />

was and she said the <strong>of</strong>fensive word was<br />

‘Christian.’” The newspaper did not notify<br />

the owners that the ad was rejected, nor did<br />

they refund the owners’ money.<br />

The owners, feeling this response was a<br />

“slap in the face” to Christians, published<br />

a Facebook post entitled, “Do you find the<br />

word ‘Christian’ <strong>of</strong>fensive?” An outcry <strong>of</strong><br />

public support for the bookstore ensued,<br />

and the Knoxville News Sentinel issued an<br />

apology for any “misunderstanding about<br />

their stance on Christianity.” They ran the<br />

ad at no extra charge.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!