30.11.2016 Views

The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25<br />

include as part <strong>of</strong> its own essence, any other entity, whether another<br />

occasion <strong>of</strong> experience or an entity <strong>of</strong> another type. This term is devoid<br />

<strong>of</strong> suggestion either <strong>of</strong> consciousness or <strong>of</strong> representative perception.<br />

Feelings are the positive type <strong>of</strong> prehension. In positive prehensions the<br />

'datum' is preserved as part <strong>of</strong> the final complex object which 'satisfies'<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> self-formation <strong>and</strong> thereby completes the occasion.<br />

This nomenclatura has been made up to conform to the condition, that, as<br />

a theory develops, its technical phraseology should grow out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

usages <strong>of</strong> the great masters who laid its foundations. <strong>The</strong> immediate<br />

verbal usages at any moment prevalent in any school <strong>of</strong> philosophy are but<br />

a small selection from the total vocabulary <strong>of</strong> the philosophic tradition.<br />

This is rightly the case having regard to the variations <strong>of</strong> doctrine.<br />

<strong>The</strong> current usage can express the doctrine <strong>of</strong> the reigning school <strong>of</strong><br />

thought <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> certain accredited variations from it. <strong>The</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> that an<br />

alternative doctrine with other roots in the historic tradition should<br />

confine itself to this selection <strong>of</strong> terms amounts to the dogmatic claim<br />

that certain preliminary assumptions should never be revised. Only those<br />

schools <strong>of</strong> thought are to be allowed which can be expressed in the<br />

sacred terms. What can reasonably be asked, is that each doctrine<br />

should ground its vocabulary on its own proper tradition. If this<br />

precaution has been taken, an outcry as to neologisms is a measure <strong>of</strong><br />

unconscious dogmatism.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!