The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2<br />
the sole data originating reflective experience are impressions <strong>of</strong><br />
sensation, <strong>and</strong> also if we also admit with him the obvious fact that no one<br />
such impression by its own individual nature discloses any information as<br />
to another such impression, then on that hypothesis the direct evidence<br />
for interconnectedness vanishes. Again, if we hold the Cartesian doctrine<br />
<strong>of</strong> substantial souls with many adventures <strong>of</strong> experience, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
substantial material bodies, then on that hypothesis the relations<br />
between two occasions <strong>of</strong> experience qualifying one soul are no evidence<br />
as to the connectedness <strong>of</strong> two such occasions respectively qualifying two<br />
different souls, <strong>and</strong> are no evidence as the connectedness <strong>of</strong> a soul <strong>and</strong> a<br />
material body, <strong>and</strong> are no evidence as to the connectedness <strong>of</strong> two<br />
occasions <strong>of</strong> agitation <strong>of</strong> one material body, or <strong>of</strong> two such occasions<br />
respectively belonging to different material bodies. But if we hold, as for<br />
example in Process <strong>and</strong> Reality, that all final individual actualities have<br />
the metaphysical character <strong>of</strong> occasions <strong>of</strong> experience, then on that<br />
hypothesis the direct evidence as to the connectedness <strong>of</strong> one's<br />
immediate present occasion <strong>of</strong> experience with one's immediately past<br />
occasions, can be validly used to suggest categories applying to the<br />
connectedness <strong>of</strong> all occasions in nature. A great deal <strong>of</strong> confused<br />
philosophical thought has its origin in obliviousness to the fact that the<br />
relevance <strong>of</strong> evidence is dictated by theory. For you cannot prove a<br />
theory by evidence which that theory dismisses as irrelevant. This is also<br />
the reason that in any science which has failed to produce any theory<br />
2