House of Representatives
2h0s7Ad
2h0s7Ad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Thursday, 1 December 2016 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 27<br />
Honourable members interjecting—<br />
The SPEAKER: I am putting the question again. The original—<br />
Mr Burke: Mr Speaker, on a point <strong>of</strong> order: you gave the division—you called the division. You announced<br />
it. You asked, 'All those against?' Not one member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>House</strong> voted no.<br />
The SPEAKER: No.<br />
Mr Burke: You paused and then called it in favour <strong>of</strong> the ayes, and not one member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>House</strong> objected to<br />
that call. That does not constitute confusion.<br />
The SPEAKER: I am going to address this matter. Where there is confusion my intention is to put the<br />
question again. We have had this happen before. The Manager <strong>of</strong> Opposition Business has made his point. I did<br />
not restate the entire question. I did when the bells rang, but I did not restate the question.<br />
Mr Snowdon interjecting—<br />
The SPEAKER: The member for Lingiari is not going to sigh and moan in the chamber. He can do it in his<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice. Let me warn the member for Lingiari now: if he is going to sigh and moan when I am addressing the<br />
<strong>House</strong> he might as well just go back to his <strong>of</strong>fice, because I will cause more <strong>of</strong> it. I did not state the full question.<br />
Manager <strong>of</strong> Opposition Business, you have made your point, but I did not state the full question. You can spend a<br />
lot <strong>of</strong> time on this, and I appreciate you might want to—<br />
Mr Burke: Yep!<br />
The SPEAKER: I think that is a very apt confession at Christmas time. I am now going to state the<br />
amendment and what the amendment was. I am going to then call and see whether a division is required. The<br />
original question was that the requested amendments be not made. To this, the honourable member for Adelaide<br />
has moved as an amendment:<br />
That all the words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:<br />
"the <strong>House</strong> calls on the Government to recommend an appropriation from the Governor-General consistent with the request<br />
from the Senate"<br />
The question is that the amendment moved by the member for Adelaide be agreed to.<br />
Division required. [11.28]<br />
(The Speaker—Hon. Tony Smith)<br />
Albanese, AN<br />
Bandt, AP<br />
Bowen, CE<br />
Burke, AS<br />
Butler, MC<br />
Byrne, AM<br />
Champion, ND<br />
Claydon, SC<br />
Conroy, PM<br />
Dick, MD<br />
Elliot, MJ<br />
Feeney, D<br />
Freelander, MR<br />
Giles, AJ<br />
Hammond, TJ<br />
Hayes, CP<br />
Husar, E<br />
Jones, SP<br />
Kelly, MJ<br />
Khalil, P<br />
King, MMH<br />
Leigh, AK<br />
Marles, RD<br />
McGowan, C<br />
Mitchell, RG<br />
O'Connor, BPJ<br />
O'Toole, C<br />
Perrett, GD (teller)<br />
Ayes ...................... 72<br />
Noes ...................... 74<br />
Majority ................. 2<br />
AYES<br />
Aly, A<br />
Bird, SL<br />
Brodtmann, G<br />
Burney, LJ<br />
Butler, TM<br />
Chalmers, JE<br />
Chesters, LM<br />
Collins, JM<br />
Danby, M<br />
Dreyfus, MA<br />
Ellis, KM<br />
Fitzgibbon, JA<br />
Georganas, S<br />
Gosling, LJ<br />
Hart, RA<br />
Hill, JC<br />
Husic, EN<br />
Keay, JT<br />
Keogh, MJ<br />
King, CF<br />
Lamb, S<br />
Macklin, JL<br />
McBride, EM<br />
Mitchell, BK<br />
Neumann, SK<br />
O'Neil, CE<br />
Owens, JA<br />
Plibersek, TJ<br />
CHAMBER