02.12.2016 Views

House of Representatives

2h0s7Ad

2h0s7Ad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thursday, 1 December 2016 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 27<br />

Honourable members interjecting—<br />

The SPEAKER: I am putting the question again. The original—<br />

Mr Burke: Mr Speaker, on a point <strong>of</strong> order: you gave the division—you called the division. You announced<br />

it. You asked, 'All those against?' Not one member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>House</strong> voted no.<br />

The SPEAKER: No.<br />

Mr Burke: You paused and then called it in favour <strong>of</strong> the ayes, and not one member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>House</strong> objected to<br />

that call. That does not constitute confusion.<br />

The SPEAKER: I am going to address this matter. Where there is confusion my intention is to put the<br />

question again. We have had this happen before. The Manager <strong>of</strong> Opposition Business has made his point. I did<br />

not restate the entire question. I did when the bells rang, but I did not restate the question.<br />

Mr Snowdon interjecting—<br />

The SPEAKER: The member for Lingiari is not going to sigh and moan in the chamber. He can do it in his<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice. Let me warn the member for Lingiari now: if he is going to sigh and moan when I am addressing the<br />

<strong>House</strong> he might as well just go back to his <strong>of</strong>fice, because I will cause more <strong>of</strong> it. I did not state the full question.<br />

Manager <strong>of</strong> Opposition Business, you have made your point, but I did not state the full question. You can spend a<br />

lot <strong>of</strong> time on this, and I appreciate you might want to—<br />

Mr Burke: Yep!<br />

The SPEAKER: I think that is a very apt confession at Christmas time. I am now going to state the<br />

amendment and what the amendment was. I am going to then call and see whether a division is required. The<br />

original question was that the requested amendments be not made. To this, the honourable member for Adelaide<br />

has moved as an amendment:<br />

That all the words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:<br />

"the <strong>House</strong> calls on the Government to recommend an appropriation from the Governor-General consistent with the request<br />

from the Senate"<br />

The question is that the amendment moved by the member for Adelaide be agreed to.<br />

Division required. [11.28]<br />

(The Speaker—Hon. Tony Smith)<br />

Albanese, AN<br />

Bandt, AP<br />

Bowen, CE<br />

Burke, AS<br />

Butler, MC<br />

Byrne, AM<br />

Champion, ND<br />

Claydon, SC<br />

Conroy, PM<br />

Dick, MD<br />

Elliot, MJ<br />

Feeney, D<br />

Freelander, MR<br />

Giles, AJ<br />

Hammond, TJ<br />

Hayes, CP<br />

Husar, E<br />

Jones, SP<br />

Kelly, MJ<br />

Khalil, P<br />

King, MMH<br />

Leigh, AK<br />

Marles, RD<br />

McGowan, C<br />

Mitchell, RG<br />

O'Connor, BPJ<br />

O'Toole, C<br />

Perrett, GD (teller)<br />

Ayes ...................... 72<br />

Noes ...................... 74<br />

Majority ................. 2<br />

AYES<br />

Aly, A<br />

Bird, SL<br />

Brodtmann, G<br />

Burney, LJ<br />

Butler, TM<br />

Chalmers, JE<br />

Chesters, LM<br />

Collins, JM<br />

Danby, M<br />

Dreyfus, MA<br />

Ellis, KM<br />

Fitzgibbon, JA<br />

Georganas, S<br />

Gosling, LJ<br />

Hart, RA<br />

Hill, JC<br />

Husic, EN<br />

Keay, JT<br />

Keogh, MJ<br />

King, CF<br />

Lamb, S<br />

Macklin, JL<br />

McBride, EM<br />

Mitchell, BK<br />

Neumann, SK<br />

O'Neil, CE<br />

Owens, JA<br />

Plibersek, TJ<br />

CHAMBER

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!