Winning the Publications Game - 4th Edition (2016)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Foreword to <strong>the</strong> fourth edition ix<br />
know yourself: what are <strong>the</strong> self- imposed barriers to<br />
getting started? How do you translate complex ideas<br />
in your brain to straightforward words on a page?<br />
Why should academics and clinicians be unashamed of<br />
using techniques that are second nature in marketing<br />
and journalism? The o<strong>the</strong>r half provides ammunition<br />
on breaching editors’ defences by demonstrating how<br />
to use <strong>the</strong> style and design of scientific papers that<br />
history shows <strong>the</strong>y most appreciate – ‘evidence- based<br />
writing’.<br />
There is ano<strong>the</strong>r way that this book is divided in two.<br />
Half <strong>the</strong> chapters are devoted to what authors need to<br />
do after <strong>the</strong>y have collected <strong>the</strong>ir data but before writing<br />
a single word. Did you know, for example, that a<br />
successful paper has four key sentences, <strong>the</strong> first six<br />
words matter and <strong>the</strong>re is likely to be just one of three<br />
conclusions? Or that a key to acceptance is to provide<br />
a single unambiguous identifiable message for readers?<br />
Or that a lengthy cycle ride along a towpath is <strong>the</strong><br />
best way to mull over what to write (but only in <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands)?<br />
In <strong>the</strong> second set of steps, once you have <strong>the</strong> message<br />
defined, <strong>the</strong> target journal identified, <strong>the</strong> co- authors<br />
in agreement and <strong>the</strong> ethical committee placated, Tim<br />
Albert employs his long experience as editor, author<br />
and journalist to show you how to draft, redraft and<br />
obtain competent assistance from informal reviewers<br />
before hitting SEND on <strong>the</strong> submission system. During<br />
more than a decade as an editor I lost count of <strong>the</strong> times<br />
I wished an author had read <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Publications</strong><br />
<strong>Game</strong> before sending me a paper that was confusing,