MPRA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Realities and Perspectives for Romania MATERIAL AND METHODS Research regarding land use effects on abandoned soils, left as fallow for several reasons, and has been of great interest in connection with considerable increase in their surface in the Republic of Moldova. The qualitative research methods (the general modality, the strategic approach, the study of reality) were used for analysis the documents and data published by the Bureau of Statistics and Land Cadastre on study issues, computer assisted. RESULTS AND DICUSSIONS According to the situation of 01.01.2015 the land fund of the Republic of Moldova constitutes 3384.6 thousand ha. Agricultural land area is 2.500 ha (73.9% of the total area), including arable land - 1.816 thousand ha (53.7%), perennial plantations - 295.3 thousand ha (8.8%), meadows and pastures - 350.1 thousand ha (10.3%). Forest plantations consists 465.2 thousand ha (13.7%). In the Republic of Moldova, as in other countries, take place the reduction of arable land per capita. According to recent data this area is 0.407 ha [2]. The average of utilized agricultural area is 2.29 ha per capita [8]. Abandoned land is considered where: i) the owner does not accept responsibility (or, for various reasons, cannot take responsibility) of working farmland for more than three years; ii) does not transmit the field (rights and obligations upon him) to a third party to be worked in agricultural use; iii) does not assume responsibility for the negative impact on land, environment, including damage to neighboring land [1]. The uncultivated (abandoned) land means any area of arable land, pastures and meadows, agricultural permanent crops or other non-agricultural land from extravilan or intravilan, owners who do not sanitizes the land. Agricultural lands are abandoned for various reasons: age of the owner, lack of financial resources, migration of rural population, etc. Abandoned lands left as fallow are not included in the cadastral register. There are lands, that their status is not determined from 1992-1994 years. It is not clear what the degradation level of these soils is. From the group of abandoned land take part the uncultivated arable soils (left as fellow), soils in vineyards that do not bear fruit, highly eroded soils, degraded pastures and hayfields. The used (cultivated) agricultural land consists 87% of the total land (arable, permanent crops, pastures and hay fields) and 13% - unused land (250 thousand ha). In the structure of agricultural land used the major share (73%) returns to arable, followed to pasture and hayfields (17%), permanent crops (orchards and vineyards) - 10% (Fig.1). The areas of fallow land in territorial aspect continue to grow from expansion of abandoned land (Fig.2). 16.70% 10.30% Arable Perennial plantations Pasture and hayfields 73% 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 Fallow land, thousand ha 38.7 39.1 37.4 36.5 34.2 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Figure 1. The structure of agriculture land Figure 2. The area of fallows land 86
Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Realities and Perspectives for Romania The statistics of General Agricultural Census performed in Moldova in 2011 showed that 2.25 million reviewed hectares of agricultural land, almost 250 thousand ha are uncultivated (abandoned), that consists 11% of the total utilized agricultural area or 20% of arable land. Most unused agricultural land (over 114 thousand ha) is located in the center of the country (Hincesti - 18 thousand ha, Calarasi - 12 thousand ha, Ialoveni - 12 thousand ha). The fewest unused agricultural land are in the north of Moldova (Donduşeni - 650 ha). Out of abandoned agricultural land (250 thousand ha), 60.6 thousand ha (24.5%) are owned of enterprises and 186.3 thousand ha (75.5%) - of individuals [8]. Considering the fact that in recent years there have been constant growths of uncultivated agricultural areas, which at the moment, according to information submitted by the district agricultural departments are up to 20% of the arable land (Table, Fig.3). Table. The surface of uncultivated land in the Republic of Moldova (ha) No. District Total of uncultivated Inclusive agricultural land Arable Vineyards Orchards Other 1 Сahul 23145 17536 4410 1110 89 2 Rezina 4979 3353 24 1227 375 3 Ungheni 6345 5473 618 1254 - 4 Străşeni 3644 1408 689 1269 - 5 Taraclia 4101 997 2447 657 - 6 Soroca 4227,8 3026 76,8 1110 15 7 Briceni 766 576 - 190 - 8 Rîşcani 1513,17 794,21 24,5 666,34 28,12 9 Drochia 2310 1745 26 539 - 10 Ialoveni 10319 5548 2825 2245 - 11 Ocniţa 1195 980,5 - 214,4 - 12 Cimişlia 9131 5601 2171 1359 - 13 Anenii Noi 11690 9261 1246 1134 49 14 Cantemir 4741,1 3452,6 511 777,5 - 15 Căuşeni 8341 6677 776 888 - 16 Hînceşti 15959 11788 2682 2244 343 17 Edineţ 1620 162 - 1458 - 18 Glodeni 1246 713 50 483 - 19 mun. Chişinău 5222 4167 484 571 - 20 Sîngerei 3039 2165 288 575,45 10,58 21 Orhei 8009 2914 444 2585 2066 22 Basarabeasca 3041 1954 719 313 55 23 Şoldăneşti 1698 807 - 891 - 24 Leova 5938 4221 1163 547,5 6,27 25 Făleşti 1066 858 16 192 - 26 Floreşti 3651,5 2135,5 - 1516 - 27 Donduşeni 1212 543 - 669 - 28 Călăraşi 7949 3803 2313 1833 - 29 Ştefan Vodă 5727,29 3107,33 1412,05 1199,91 8 30 mun. Bălţi 283,5 119,5 - 164 - 31 Dubăsari 1734 1108 3 236 387 32 Criuleni 5137,67 3553,24 486,35 1063,75 34,33 33 Teleneşti 4144 3112 483 525 24 34 Nisporeni 5422 3020 1195 1208 - 87
Page 1:
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Page 4 and 5:
Copyright @ 2016, Research Institut
Page 6 and 7:
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE President: ALE
Page 9 and 10:
CONTENTS SECTION 1 “THE CONCEPTS,
Page 11 and 12:
Alin-Angelin IORGA „Legal regleme
Page 13 and 14:
Agrarian Economy and Rural Developm
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48: Agrarian Economy and Rural Developm
Page 53 and 54: Italy Bulgaria Hungary Netherlands
Page 55 and 56: 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Page 97: Agrarian Economy and Rural Developm
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS According t
Page 189 and 190:
Table 4. Comparative situation rega
Page 191 and 192:
Other important areas are cultivate
Page 193 and 194:
early varieties, with a smaller veg
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
MATERIAL AND METHOD Livestock farmi
Page 203 and 204:
Luxembourg 205 185 199 188 Malta 19
Page 205 and 206:
Luxembourg Bulgaria 1,828 2,101 1,4
Page 207 and 208:
CONCLUSIONS The analysis has shown
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
DEMAND AND SUPPLY OF MILK (THOUSNAD
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
POULTRY MEAT (THOUSAND TONS) Agrari
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
LEGAL REGLEMENTATIONS IN THE EUROPE
Page 247 and 248:
and Directive 2000/76/EC of the Eur
Page 249 and 250:
• rural environment - in 2008 the
Page 251 and 252:
Responsible authorities are the Min
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
MODELS FOR SHORT VEGETABLES’ CHAI
Page 411 and 412:
Staffs are projected based on coope
Page 413 and 414:
In the first year of operation of t
Page 415 and 416:
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT IN ASSOCIATIV
Page 417 and 418:
oth and 60.3% tomatoes juice. Other
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
show all

MPRA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?