03.01.2017 Views

Glamour USA - September 2016

Glamour is one of the biggest fashion and beauty magazine brands, reaching an all-time high of one out of eight American women, with 10 million print readers ... be sure to click or tap the product ads on the page to click through to Amazon and BUY IT NOW!

Glamour is one of the biggest fashion and beauty magazine brands, reaching an all-time high of one out of eight American women, with 10 million print readers ... be sure to click or tap the product ads on the page to click through to Amazon and BUY IT NOW!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

Introducingng<br />

“Dirty<br />

Rose”<br />

What comes to mind when you think of rose<br />

perfume? Grandma? Laura Ashley? Underwear-drawer<br />

sachets? I’m telling you, forget<br />

all that. The new rose blends are less stuffy<br />

and more like perfume’s equivalent of<br />

second-day hair—dirty, but in a good way.<br />

Here’s why: These perfumes mix rose not<br />

with classic fruit and powder notes but with<br />

unexpected, sensual ingredients like musk,<br />

oud, sea salt, and earthy patchouli. (My faves<br />

include Elizabeth and James’ Nirvana Rose<br />

and Molton Brown’s Rosa Absolute.) “Dirty<br />

rose” is suddenly unapologetically sexy, and<br />

the only way I’ll be wearing floral this fall.<br />

—Katheryn Erickson, beauty writer<br />

Nothing grosses me out<br />

more than bugs. But that was<br />

before I saw the scarab collection<br />

from fine jeweler Bibi<br />

van der Velden, based on the<br />

iridescent insects revered<br />

by ancient Egyptians. Other<br />

brands are making beetleinspired<br />

bling too (like this<br />

$25 Banana Republic pin),<br />

and now my worst nightmare<br />

actually looks…elegant.<br />

—Elissa Velluto, senior<br />

accessories editor<br />

Legs<br />

A Trend With<br />

ROSE<br />

S:<br />

TIM<br />

HOUT<br />

; STY<br />

LIST<br />

:JO<br />

HN<br />

NO<br />

LSON<br />

FOR<br />

HAL<br />

LEY<br />

RE<br />

ESOURCES. BEETLE: COU RTESY OF BANANA<br />

REPU<br />

BLIC<br />

.CH<br />

AN:<br />

EMIL<br />

YKE<br />

MP.<br />

UN<br />

NED<br />

ITED<br />

PAT<br />

CH<br />

H,<br />

CUST<br />

OM<br />

MADE BY ERIKA DURAN, ETSY.COM/SHOP/ERADURA<br />

78 glamour.com<br />

When @glamourmag posted this photo of<br />

me wearing an Eloquii dress, I was excited<br />

to read the comments. I loved the bright,<br />

f louncy number for its curve-boosting<br />

factor, but I get that taste is personal. So<br />

I wasn’t at all offended when—an hour<br />

later—the dress had been deemed “ugly,”<br />

“terrible,” and “no bueno.” What did cause<br />

me sudden-onset anger? The number of<br />

women who called it “unflattering,” as in,<br />

“this is the most unflattering thing I’ve ever<br />

seen.” Here’s where I call bullshit: Unflattering<br />

is just a code word for “not slimming,”<br />

and shocking as it may seem, this size 12<br />

The<br />

Rant<br />

woman doesn’t choose clothes for the sole<br />

purpose of appearing elongated, slimmer,<br />

or sucked in. Curves are all well and good,<br />

these commenters seemed to be saying, as<br />

long as you wear Spanx and head-to-toe<br />

black and stay away from stripes (never<br />

mind stripes and ruffles). In other words,<br />

while we’re embracing women of all sizes<br />

as never before, we’ve yet to accept that successful<br />

dressing doesn’t mean minimizing<br />

our bodies. So know this: If you hate what<br />

I’m wearing, I can take it! But I like my curves,<br />

and I don’t want to “f latter” them away.<br />

—Lauren Chan, associate fashion writer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!