10.01.2017 Views

Marked exam answers with assessor feedback

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Question 1: Discuss FOUR criteria that GFATM might apply when awarding the contracts to suppliers<br />

(20 marks)<br />

Sample answer:<br />

Award of contracts is made to suppliers when the ‘best’ option,<br />

value or price had been determined. Each supplier would be<br />

assessed on their suitability, acceptability and capability, that<br />

they can bring to the requirement at that time and potentially<br />

moving forward <strong>with</strong> later procurement or requirements.<br />

Award criteria needs to cover both technical and commercial<br />

criteria. Technical is that the supplier has the knowledge, skills,<br />

expertise to deliver the contract. Commercial criteria is that the<br />

supplier has the financial status, innovation and ‘best’ solution to<br />

deliver the contract.<br />

Assessor comments:<br />

A good, but lengthy, introduction. It<br />

contextualises the answer, but it doesn't<br />

contribute anything to the answer and no marks<br />

can be awarded for it at this stage. The body of<br />

the answer duplicates some of this content.<br />

No specific marks are given for the introduction<br />

but it does demonstrate some understanding of<br />

the subject matter.<br />

The case study refers to GFATM wishing to reduce supply chain<br />

bottlenecks and shortages. To achieve this they could use the<br />

Kraljic matrix to help them visualise which products are in which<br />

quarter and what they can do to improve where possible.<br />

The Kraljic matrix rates how complex the supply chain is <strong>with</strong><br />

how important the item is to the organisation so that a plan can<br />

be devised regarding the amount of time, effort and resource is<br />

dedicated to the purchase type.<br />

Complexity of supply chain<br />

Low<br />

High<br />

Importance of item<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

Non-critical<br />

items<br />

Strategic items<br />

Partnering<br />

Bottleneck<br />

items<br />

www.cips.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!