Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
are precariously close to the walls. Many times<br />
these studios are chosen because they have a<br />
good piano, enough music stands, and sufficient<br />
headphones and cue-mix capability to accommodate<br />
an orchestra of this size. Generally the<br />
microphone inventories, while decent, are insufficient<br />
to cover all the instrumentalists and singers<br />
with “A” line choices as well.<br />
One thing I’ve done to support this effort is<br />
to assemble my own personal mic collection.<br />
This enables me to supplement the chosen studio’s<br />
mic collection. I have a variety of condensers,<br />
ribbons and dynamics. I prefer using<br />
ribbon mics on brass and reeds. Until recently<br />
I had a pristine collection of RCA ribbon<br />
mics that I maintained and used over many<br />
years. There were two 44s, seven 77s and a BK5.<br />
I always used the 77s in a figure-8 pattern, as<br />
they are more of a match for the 44s and are<br />
about 6dB hotter in output that way. It has also<br />
helped the phase relationship in a large, multimic<br />
scheme.<br />
Several years ago, as I was about to go<br />
through another ribbon-mic collection re-ribboning<br />
ordeal, I came upon an opportunity to<br />
replace my collection. I had tried every ribbon<br />
mic manufactured. Only the AEA brand gave<br />
me the equivalent sound and mixing integrity<br />
that was comparable to the RCAs. However, they<br />
present the same basic challenges as the RCAs:<br />
lack of ribbon durability, low-ish output and too<br />
much weight for the type of small mic stands<br />
that are prevalent here in Chicago.<br />
When presented with the opportunity to<br />
test the Shure ribbon mics, I discovered that not<br />
only do they sound great, but they are as warm<br />
as the vintage ribbons and have nearly double<br />
the output, less distortion factor, a very narrow<br />
dead-side null and much more durable ribbons.<br />
They have the sound and mixing integrity that<br />
I require when choosing a mic for a purpose. I<br />
replaced my entire RCA collection with a collection<br />
of 13 Shure KSM 313s. This change was<br />
a definite step in a more modern direction for<br />
me. Now I can mic the entire brass and reed<br />
sections with this collection of the same microphone<br />
model. All 13 mics sound incredibly<br />
similar, articulate fast note passages wonderfully<br />
and, due to the increased null, provide me<br />
with better phase relationship than ever before.<br />
I then use the best condensers available (tube<br />
or FET) and the occasional dynamic for all my<br />
other miking needs.<br />
My approach for recording big band is a<br />
combination of multitrack-type spot miking<br />
of the instruments and an overall room<br />
miking technique. Studio setup and musician<br />
floor-placement is important, and can contain<br />
some flexibility. I do not use isolation rooms<br />
for the trumpet, trombone and sax sections, or<br />
drums, as it decouples the organic nature of the<br />
big band sound and power. In general, there is<br />
a familiar big band setup configuration used<br />
when the bands perform in public: front row of<br />
saxes, middle row of trombones and rear row of<br />
trumpets. The trombone and trumpet sections<br />
are ideally elevated on risers. The rhythm section<br />
is generally stage right of the horns.<br />
Regardless of whether you’re in a studio or<br />
live performance area, the further away from<br />
the walls one can set up, the better, as distance<br />
from the walls will help with discrete pickup<br />
isolation. Using this floor scheme when recording<br />
in studio, I will set the brass and reeds up<br />
as in the familiar method described above, but<br />
array the rhythm section directly 180 degrees<br />
opposite of the brass and reeds so as to increase<br />
discrete microphone/track isolation. If you<br />
are working without risers, having the trumpets<br />
stand will help with bleed to the next row.<br />
While risers can provide a partial solution for<br />
using a more traditional horn-setup configuration,<br />
in medium-sized rooms they can compromise<br />
one’s already restricted floor space, and<br />
generally they are outside the budget point.<br />
I mic the rhythm section with a close<br />
miking technique and loosely spot-mic the<br />
horns. For room miking I will use a stereo<br />
coincident pair for the horns, and one room<br />
mic above the rhythm section. I use rear baffle<br />
placement technique; line-of-sight isolation<br />
booths (if available) for piano, bass or both; and<br />
a PA-type (headphone-less) cue strategy whenever<br />
possible.<br />
While I have used nearly every possible<br />
floor setup configuration to record big bands,<br />
I am currently setting the horns up in a “U”<br />
or horseshoe configuration, with the rhythm<br />
players opposite the trumpets, and the bones<br />
and saxes set perpendicularly in between them,<br />
their distance apart determined by the width<br />
of the trumpet row (see diagram above). This<br />
enables me to work the acoustics of pretty much<br />
any room or location environment. Although I<br />
do not use an isolation booth for drums, I will<br />
rear- and side-baffle them with low baffles for<br />
sight and oriented towards the band. I have<br />
techniques by which I am comfortable recording<br />
bass and piano in the room with the full<br />
band; however, if the line of sight is right I will<br />
use an isolation booth for either bass, piano or<br />
FEBRUARY 2017 DOWNBEAT 93