14.02.2017 Views

LF_021617

The Lake Forest Leader 021617

The Lake Forest Leader 021617

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LakeForestLeader.com news<br />

the lake forest leader | February 16, 2017 | 7<br />

Lake Forest Plan Commission<br />

T-Mobile looks to add tower in <strong>LF</strong><br />

Igor Studenkov<br />

Freelance Reporter<br />

T-Mobile is looking to<br />

build a new cellphone tower<br />

in an area that doesn’t<br />

currently allow any.<br />

The Lake Forest Plan<br />

Commission reviewed<br />

proposed changes to the<br />

City’s regulation on cellphone<br />

towers, which were<br />

suggested by the Wireless<br />

Communications Ad Hoc<br />

Task Force at its meeting<br />

on Wednesday, Feb. 8.<br />

The changes were mainly<br />

aimed at clearing up the<br />

existing regulations and<br />

putting more emphasis<br />

on ensuring that any new<br />

structures would fit with<br />

the surrounding community<br />

as much as possible.<br />

While the commission<br />

had some suggestions<br />

for the proposal, they approved<br />

most of it as is.<br />

Richard Riley, head of<br />

Wireless & Broadcasting<br />

Citing Advisors LLC consulting<br />

company, asked<br />

the commission what legal<br />

steps he would need to<br />

take to put up a new tower<br />

for his client, T-Mobile.<br />

The company is looking to<br />

fill a hole in its Lake Forest<br />

coverage by putting a<br />

tower at the intersection<br />

of Waukegan and Everett<br />

roads.<br />

The changes were part<br />

of the Plan Commission’s<br />

ongoing effort to review<br />

every part of the Lake Forest<br />

zoning code. Catherine<br />

Czerniak, the City’s director<br />

of community development,<br />

explained while this<br />

part of the code was relatively<br />

recent, many zoning<br />

regulations haven’t been<br />

updated in decades.<br />

Most of the proposed<br />

changes were designed to<br />

clean up procedures and<br />

clear up aspects of the law<br />

that the ad hoc task force<br />

thought was ambiguous.<br />

It proposed expanding the<br />

“purpose” section, adding<br />

provisions specifying that,<br />

when making decisions<br />

about the towers, the City<br />

should consider whether<br />

this would encourage<br />

high-quality service, as<br />

well as whether it would<br />

have any adverse impact<br />

on the community. That includes<br />

“protecting health,<br />

safety and welfare of the<br />

community, and protecting<br />

and preserving community<br />

character and property values.”<br />

The task force also revised<br />

and expanded official<br />

definitions, to clarify<br />

what it saw as ambiguous<br />

terminology, while updating<br />

some technological<br />

terms.<br />

They proposed adding<br />

language clarifying that all<br />

of the current towers and<br />

antennas wouldn’t be subject<br />

to the new regulations,<br />

as long as they’re regularly<br />

maintained.<br />

The approval process<br />

language went through<br />

some changes as well,<br />

specifying that maintaining<br />

the structure only<br />

requires a building permit,<br />

while building a new<br />

structure in the overlay<br />

district – an area where the<br />

antennas and towers are<br />

allowed – requires a Special<br />

Use permit. Creating a<br />

new overlay district would<br />

require an amendment to<br />

Lake Forest municipal<br />

code, as well as a Special<br />

Use permit and a building<br />

permit. And, when considering<br />

whether to grant the<br />

amendment request, the<br />

City would look at whether<br />

it minimizes adverse<br />

impact on property values<br />

and the community’s visual<br />

character. The regulations<br />

would encourage<br />

mobile providers to look<br />

for sites that provide benefits<br />

for public agencies and<br />

community institutions.<br />

The task force suggested<br />

cleaning up the criteria<br />

section, getting more<br />

specific about what standards<br />

the City would use<br />

when considering building<br />

permits, special use<br />

permits and amendments.<br />

Most notably, if a company<br />

wants to build a new<br />

tower, it has to show that<br />

co-locating on the existing<br />

structure isn’t feasible.<br />

It would also clarify the<br />

language regarding what<br />

documents the applicants<br />

should submit.<br />

Finally, the task force<br />

suggested adding language<br />

that would require<br />

the owner of the structure<br />

or the property owner to<br />

notify the City if the structure<br />

has been abandoned.<br />

It also requires to owners<br />

to maintain the structures,<br />

and make the structures<br />

available for City inspections.<br />

The changes the commissioners<br />

suggested were<br />

slight. Timothy Henry suggested<br />

notifying owners<br />

of towers and antennas of<br />

their obligations under the<br />

code. Commissioner Guy<br />

Berg suggested the mobile<br />

providers should be required<br />

to provide coverage<br />

maps for the areas around<br />

Lake Forest, so that the<br />

City has a better context.<br />

Riley told the commission<br />

that his client, T-Mobile,<br />

was looking to build<br />

a tower at the intersection<br />

of Waukegan and Everett<br />

roads because it has a<br />

gap in coverage in the surrounding<br />

area.<br />

“It has to be centrally<br />

located [relative] to the<br />

existing sites in order to<br />

complete the network,”<br />

Riley said.<br />

The intersection isn’t<br />

in any overlay zone, so<br />

Riley came to the meeting<br />

to find out how he and<br />

his client should go about<br />

putting one in place. He<br />

emphasized that he understood<br />

the concerns about<br />

appearances, sharing possible<br />

tower designs that are<br />

designed to be less towerlike,<br />

such as a clock tower.<br />

Czerniak said that T-<br />

Mobile would be welcome<br />

to apply for the amendment<br />

and the Special Use<br />

permit at the same time.<br />

Berg said that, when<br />

granting amendments, the<br />

City should look at more<br />

than just T-Mobile’s needs.<br />

Instead, the City would<br />

look at the needs of all carriers,<br />

and create an overlay<br />

district based on that.<br />

Riley wasn’t comfortable<br />

with making two<br />

applications at the same<br />

time, he would rather have<br />

an overlay zone in place<br />

first.<br />

“We try to follow zoning<br />

code whatever we can,” he<br />

said. “I really believe defining<br />

the overlay district<br />

ahead of time is a way to<br />

go.”<br />

“I would suggest [to my<br />

client] that we file after<br />

the overlay district was<br />

established, so I can give<br />

my client guidance,” Riley<br />

said.<br />

The Plan Commission<br />

then voted to accept the<br />

recommendations, with<br />

suggested changes.<br />

According to Czerniak,<br />

the proposed amendments<br />

will now go to the City<br />

attorney for review. Once<br />

the review is complete, the<br />

Plan Commission will vote<br />

on whether to approve the<br />

final version, which will<br />

then be sent to the City<br />

Council for final approval.<br />

NFYN<br />

From Page 6<br />

THE GLENVIEW LANTERN<br />

Vacant Bess lot could<br />

expand parking options<br />

The Glenview Village<br />

Board considered an<br />

amendment to the municipal<br />

code that would<br />

allow temporary downtown<br />

parking in the former<br />

Bess Hardware lot<br />

during the board’s Feb. 7<br />

meeting.<br />

Glenview purchased<br />

the vacant property, located<br />

at 1850 Glenview<br />

Road, on Jan. 25 with the<br />

intent to resell by the send<br />

of 2018. In the meantime,<br />

Village staff recommends<br />

establishing a two-hour<br />

parking restriction until<br />

the new owner commences<br />

redevelopment.<br />

The new temporary<br />

parking would include the<br />

main Bess lot and a small<br />

zone along Depot Street on<br />

the west side of the building,<br />

adding 50 stalls to the<br />

downtown area. The recommendation<br />

would allow<br />

parking for a maximum of<br />

two hours between 8 a.m.-<br />

6 p.m. from Monday-Saturday,<br />

without any restrictions<br />

after 6 p.m. during<br />

those days or anytime on<br />

Sundays.<br />

The suggested restrictions<br />

are consistent with<br />

the current code for streets<br />

and downtown parking in<br />

the same area, including<br />

Glenview Road, Prairie<br />

Street, Church Street and<br />

Dewes Street.<br />

Trustees unanimously<br />

approved the first reading<br />

of the ordinance,<br />

which will appear on the<br />

consent agenda at the<br />

board’s Tuesday, Feb. 21<br />

meeting.<br />

After the final consideration<br />

and passage of<br />

the ordinance, the Glenview<br />

Police Department<br />

will enforce the parking<br />

restrictions through<br />

warnings and tickets.<br />

Parking will no longer be<br />

available for the general<br />

public once the property<br />

is sold.<br />

Reporting by Chris Pullam,<br />

Contributing Editor. Full<br />

story at GlenviewLantern.<br />

com.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!