01.04.2017 Views

2017 Channel Report - Sights Set High - Marketers Plan to Differentiate with Innovation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>2017</strong><br />

Yes Lifecycle Marketing<br />

<strong>Channel</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>Sights</strong> <strong>Set</strong> <strong>High</strong>: <strong>Marketers</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>Differentiate</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> in <strong>2017</strong><br />

Executive Summary<br />

As long as cus<strong>to</strong>mers continue <strong>to</strong> shop online, cross-channel marketing<br />

will increase in importance. Because consumers value product updates<br />

(especially cus<strong>to</strong>mized ones), coupons and relevant tips, email marketing<br />

will remain an effective channel through which brands communicate<br />

<strong>with</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mers and drive sales. But as mobile commerce becomes the<br />

norm, marketers will need <strong>to</strong> implement new strategies <strong>to</strong> differentiate<br />

themselves not only in cus<strong>to</strong>mer inboxes, but also online, in order <strong>to</strong><br />

remain competitive.<br />

<strong>Marketers</strong> have their sights set high for <strong>2017</strong>, according <strong>to</strong> a survey<br />

conducted by Yes Lifecycle Marketing of more than 300 brands<br />

online and in-person at the National Retail Federations’ Shop.org<br />

Digital Summit in September and Oc<strong>to</strong>ber of 2016. Survey takers,<br />

the majority of whom were retailers, plan <strong>to</strong> incorporate innovative<br />

tactics like dynamic offers, user-generated content and cross-channel<br />

initiatives <strong>to</strong> gain a competitive edge. They also plan on investing in<br />

the technologies <strong>to</strong> power those tactics.<br />

The following report outlines the survey findings in detail and<br />

offers takeaways for marketers <strong>to</strong> consider in their efforts <strong>to</strong> drive<br />

engagement and conversions in <strong>2017</strong> and beyond.<br />

pg. 1


Please rank your <strong>to</strong>p three most important marketing goals for<br />

<strong>2017</strong> <strong>with</strong> #1 being the most important:<br />

Priority #1 Priority #2 Priority #3<br />

Increase sales<br />

34.7% | 13.7% | 6.3%<br />

Improve cus<strong>to</strong>mer<br />

engagement<br />

18.7% | 16.7% | 15.4%<br />

Improve cus<strong>to</strong>mer acquisition<br />

12.3% | 14.3% | 17.5%<br />

Improve cus<strong>to</strong>mer retention<br />

11.3% | 15.7% | 9.8%<br />

Build a better understanding<br />

of the cus<strong>to</strong>mer<br />

8.3% | 11.6% | 12.3%<br />

Improve profitability / margin<br />

7.3% | 6.8% | 8.8%<br />

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%<br />

As <strong>with</strong> most marketers, “increase sales” should be, and is, the #1<br />

priority. Supporting this goal is always the challenge, and what keeps<br />

marketers up at night.<br />

Responses from those surveyed suggest that, at the very least,<br />

marketers know what they must do in order <strong>to</strong> get there, even though,<br />

in many cases, they acknowledge they are not there yet.<br />

For example, the majority of survey takers admitted that their<br />

personalization efforts are weak; but they do know what they need <strong>to</strong><br />

do <strong>to</strong> make this a priority in order <strong>to</strong> better serve their audiences in<br />

<strong>2017</strong>. While some brands do not yet use web browsing or purchase<br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry data <strong>to</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mize offers, many are looking <strong>to</strong> incorporate more<br />

advanced tactics like cross-channel or dynamic offers <strong>to</strong> improve<br />

relevancy. Brands will look <strong>to</strong> marketing technology and service<br />

providers <strong>to</strong> help get them on the right path through an emphasis on<br />

technology innovation and analytic services.<br />

Improve cross-channel<br />

effectiveness<br />

3.7% | 12.6% | 11.2%<br />

Improve internal efficiency<br />

2.0% | 4.8% | 12.6%<br />

Reduce marketing costs<br />

1.0% | 3.8% | 6.0%<br />

None of these<br />

0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0%<br />

pg. 2


Key Findings<br />

• Brands will invest in cross-channel initiatives <strong>to</strong> improve upon<br />

existing tactics:<br />

Forty percent say they will implement cross-channel attribution<br />

initiatives in <strong>2017</strong>, and 38 percent plan <strong>to</strong> implement test <strong>to</strong>ols for<br />

channel and content.<br />

Your Offer Inside!<br />

• Brands will differentiate themselves <strong>with</strong> more sophisticated<br />

marketing techniques:<br />

Thirty-eight percent say that while they’re not using usergenerated<br />

content currently, they’d like <strong>to</strong> do so in the next year.<br />

• <strong>Marketers</strong> know their personalization efforts are weak and see<br />

value in improvement:<br />

Forty-nine percent say they feel their communication efforts are<br />

one-size-fits-all and 68 percent say they wish they could improve<br />

these efforts in <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

• Brands are turning <strong>to</strong> marketing service providers and<br />

technology for innovation:<br />

According <strong>to</strong> survey takers, technology innovation is the most<br />

important area when selecting a cross-channel marketing service<br />

provider, followed by analytic services.<br />

Your Offer Inside!<br />

• <strong>Marketers</strong> consider virtual reality a luxury, not a necessity: Fiftyseven<br />

percent believe that virtual reality does not apply <strong>to</strong> their<br />

organizations, and 55 percent say the same about augmented<br />

reality.<br />

• <strong>Marketers</strong> see value in marketing investments:<br />

Only one in ten cite reducing marketing costs as a priority<br />

for <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

pg. 3


Which of the following channels will receive an increase in<br />

attention/budget from you/your marketing team in <strong>2017</strong>?<br />

Email<br />

Social<br />

Display<br />

SMS<br />

Direct Mail<br />

Push<br />

Telemarketing<br />

Mobile Wallet<br />

Email<br />

18%<br />

17%<br />

15%<br />

8%<br />

7%<br />

37%<br />

54%<br />

What cross-channel initiatives are you looking <strong>to</strong><br />

implement in <strong>2017</strong>?<br />

68%<br />

Cross-channel attribution 40%<br />

Test <strong>to</strong>ols for channel and content<br />

Data-fed, consistent view of<br />

the cus<strong>to</strong>mer<br />

35%<br />

Integrated au<strong>to</strong>mated offer optimization 33%<br />

Contextual content management 30%<br />

Self-service audience segmenation 28%<br />

Alternative, targeted acquisition 26%<br />

Competitive interaction reporting 17%<br />

38%<br />

<strong>Marketers</strong> plan <strong>to</strong> integrate channels <strong>to</strong><br />

improve the cus<strong>to</strong>mer experience and drive<br />

sales in <strong>2017</strong><br />

<strong>Marketers</strong> want <strong>to</strong> improve cus<strong>to</strong>mer engagement and increase sales<br />

in <strong>2017</strong>. They will continue <strong>to</strong> utilize proven marketing channels such<br />

as email and social media <strong>to</strong> achieve this goal. However, many plan <strong>to</strong><br />

implement cross-channel initiatives <strong>to</strong> break down the siloes between<br />

these channels and offer cus<strong>to</strong>mers relevant, integrated experiences.<br />

On average, marketers will increase attention or budget of 1.7 channels.<br />

Most respondents (68 percent) report that email marketing will receive<br />

an increase in marketing budget this year. Social media marketing<br />

will also be a priority, <strong>with</strong> more than half (54 percent) reporting their<br />

organizations’ social media budget will increase. Offline initiatives such<br />

as telemarketing and direct mail rank low on the list.<br />

Brands also see value in integrating digital and offline <strong>to</strong> gain a<br />

consistent view of the cus<strong>to</strong>mer and offer an improved experience.<br />

Many will implement cross-channel marketing strategies in the year<br />

ahead <strong>to</strong> integrate siloed communication programs. Forty percent say<br />

they are looking <strong>to</strong> implement cross-channel attribution initiatives,<br />

followed by test <strong>to</strong>ols for channels and content at 38 percent and a<br />

data-fed, consistent view of the cus<strong>to</strong>mer at 35 percent.<br />

Takeaway:<br />

Email remains and will continue <strong>to</strong> be a tried and true method of<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mer communication. With social and display rounding out the<br />

<strong>to</strong>p three channels <strong>to</strong> receive an increase in attention and/or budget<br />

from marketers, brands are understanding the need <strong>to</strong> present<br />

relevant cus<strong>to</strong>mer experiences across these channels in order <strong>to</strong><br />

increase engagement <strong>with</strong> their audience.<br />

Similarly, these <strong>to</strong>p three cross-channel initiatives, as noted in<br />

the graph <strong>to</strong> the left, support the path <strong>to</strong> improve the cus<strong>to</strong>mer<br />

experience, which will ultimately drive sales.<br />

Other 4%<br />

pg. 4


Advanced Tactics<br />

Social media share but<strong>to</strong>ns<br />

Retailers express interest in more advanced<br />

marketing tactics like dynamic offers and<br />

user-generated content<br />

Video<br />

68% 20% 4% 8%<br />

Most brands already incorporate tactics like social media share but<strong>to</strong>ns<br />

(68 percent) and video (56 percent), However, it may be surprising<br />

about one in five (19 percent) say they are not using social media share<br />

but<strong>to</strong>ns but are interested in doing so in <strong>2017</strong>, and 26 percent said the<br />

same about video.<br />

Dynamic offers<br />

User generated content<br />

Beacons<br />

56% 26% 6% 12%<br />

23% 46% 8% 23%<br />

38% 38% 8% 16%<br />

While most brands say they are not currently using advanced<br />

marketing tactics such as gamification and dynamic offers, many say<br />

they want <strong>to</strong> use them <strong>to</strong> innovate their marketing programs in <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

Almost half (46 percent) say that although they’re not using dynamic<br />

offers currently, they are interested in doing so this year. Thirty-eight<br />

percent say the same about user-generated content, and 29 percent<br />

say they are interested in beacons.<br />

Not surprisingly, virtual reality (a computer-generated environment)<br />

and augmented reality (superimposed images that alter a user’s<br />

current view of the world) continue <strong>to</strong> be considered nice-<strong>to</strong>-haves<br />

rather than necessities. However, almost three in five (57 percent)<br />

believe that virtual reality does not apply <strong>to</strong> their organization, and 55<br />

percent say the same about augmented reality.<br />

11% 28% 8% 53%<br />

Virtual reality<br />

8% 21% 14% 57%<br />

Augmented reality<br />

7% 25% 14% 54%<br />

Takeaway:<br />

The resistance <strong>to</strong>wards flashier tactics like VR and AR indicates<br />

that marketers are more pragmatic about their plans <strong>to</strong> improve<br />

marketing efforts. Alternately, they may want <strong>to</strong> ensure they achieve<br />

mastery first rather than competence alone <strong>with</strong> tactics that predate<br />

VR, AR and others. <strong>Marketers</strong> will instead focus on concrete, yet<br />

forward-thinking tactics that reach cus<strong>to</strong>mers at the right time and<br />

<strong>with</strong> the right message.<br />

Currently<br />

using<br />

Not using but<br />

interested in<br />

Have reservations about<br />

implementing<br />

Not<br />

applicable<br />

pg. 5


Which of the following data types do you use for<br />

communication personalization?<br />

Email engagement<br />

Recipient name<br />

Purchase his<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

Web behavior<br />

Demographic data<br />

Geographic data<br />

Social media engagement<br />

Display ads engagement<br />

I don’t use data 3%<br />

Other<br />

1%<br />

30%<br />

41%<br />

54%<br />

53%<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

49%<br />

Which of the following content areas are you currently<br />

personalizing based on data insights?<br />

Subject line<br />

Recipient name<br />

Copy<br />

Frequency of campaigns<br />

Images<br />

Featured product<br />

Time of message delivery<br />

Offer<br />

We don’t personalize<br />

12%<br />

31%<br />

29%<br />

29%<br />

27%<br />

35%<br />

34%<br />

70%<br />

54%<br />

54%<br />

48%<br />

While they are optimistic for <strong>2017</strong>, many brands still fail <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />

basic levels of personalization, particularly <strong>with</strong> email. Many do not use<br />

common sources of consumer data, such as data enhancement, web<br />

behavior, or purchase his<strong>to</strong>ry, <strong>to</strong> personalize emails. Half of the survey<br />

respondents (50 percent) do not use web behavior data (such as the<br />

products a shopper has recently browsed) <strong>to</strong> personalize marketing<br />

content; 47 percent do not use purchase his<strong>to</strong>ry; and 45 percent do not<br />

personalize <strong>with</strong> the recipient’s name.<br />

Survey responses also exposed that many brands do not personalize<br />

basic email components like subject line or email body. When asked<br />

what content they personalize, responses show nearly half (46 percent)<br />

still do not personalize subject lines, and 65 percent still do not<br />

personalize email copy.<br />

Takeaway:<br />

There is definitely opportunity for improvement for marketers.<br />

With the right technology, marketers can personalize their<br />

communications. What’s more, cus<strong>to</strong>mers expect it. They want<br />

communications <strong>to</strong> be tailored <strong>to</strong> them based on what they need,<br />

when they need it. Effective personalization will increase response<br />

rates, build loyalty, and help drive market share.<br />

<strong>Marketers</strong> who have a 360-degree view of their cus<strong>to</strong>mers by<br />

accessing and analyzing their descriptive, response, and behavioral<br />

data will have a much better understanding of the needs of their<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers. The insights derived from this data can then influence<br />

content <strong>to</strong> better target their communications.<br />

pg. 6


In which channels do you wish you could<br />

improve personalization?<br />

59%<br />

68%<br />

Despite aspirations, many retailers know<br />

they still miss the mark <strong>with</strong> personalization<br />

Brands know that personalization is an opportunity for improvement.<br />

More than two thirds (68 percent) say they wish they could improve<br />

email personalization and 59 percent say the same about website<br />

personalization.<br />

38%<br />

44%<br />

Takeaway:<br />

<strong>Marketers</strong> still struggle <strong>with</strong> personalization, and they know it. They<br />

also acknowledge that personalization must be improved if they<br />

want <strong>to</strong> successfully implement more advanced marketing tactics<br />

like dynamic offers or beacons. Many are turning <strong>to</strong> technology and<br />

marketing service providers for help analyzing cus<strong>to</strong>mer data and<br />

implementing innovative campaigns <strong>to</strong> reach cus<strong>to</strong>mers when and<br />

where it matters most.<br />

17%<br />

18%<br />

2%<br />

Other<br />

SMS<br />

Push/<br />

mobile apps<br />

Display<br />

ad<br />

Social<br />

media<br />

Website<br />

Email<br />

pg. 7


Nearly half of respondents admitted that their personalization efforts<br />

are weak when asked <strong>to</strong> self-critique.<br />

On a scale of zero <strong>to</strong> 10 <strong>with</strong> zero being highly personalized and 10 being one-size-fits-all, 49 percent leaned <strong>to</strong>wards<br />

one-size-fits all. Eleven percent said they believe their efforts are neutral and 40 percent leaned <strong>to</strong>wards highly<br />

personalized.<br />

While they believe they miss the mark on personalization, many marketers feel that their efforts are improving for the<br />

better, <strong>with</strong> more than two-thirds (68 percent) leaning <strong>to</strong>wards “evolving” on a scale from static <strong>to</strong> evolving. And on a<br />

scale from uninspired <strong>to</strong> innovative, 56 percent lean <strong>to</strong>ward “innovative.”<br />

Which of the following do you believe best describes your marketing efforts?<br />

One size<br />

fits all<br />

Neutral<br />

49% 11%<br />

40%<br />

<strong>High</strong>ly<br />

personalized<br />

Neutral<br />

18% 14% 68%<br />

Static<br />

Evolving<br />

Neutral<br />

27% 17% 56%<br />

Uninspired<br />

Innovative<br />

pg. 8


AVERAGE OF: When selecting a marketing technology and<br />

services provider, please rank from most <strong>to</strong> least important the<br />

following offerings. (6 being most important – 1 being least)<br />

Tech innovation<br />

Analytic services<br />

Strategic services<br />

Client services<br />

Creative services<br />

Training <strong>to</strong>ols<br />

AVERAGE OF: Please rank from most <strong>to</strong> least important the<br />

following characteristics of a marketing technology 2.9 solution.<br />

(9 being most – 1 being least)<br />

2.7<br />

2.7<br />

4.0<br />

3.8<br />

3.8<br />

4.2<br />

Brands are looking <strong>to</strong> technology and<br />

marketing services providers <strong>to</strong><br />

implement more advanced tactics and<br />

improve personalization<br />

Many brands are serious about their plans <strong>to</strong> improve personalization<br />

and implement more advanced tactics in <strong>2017</strong> and many will look <strong>to</strong><br />

marketing technology and service providers for help. When asked about<br />

what offerings they look for in a marketing service provider, technology<br />

innovation and analytic services ranked the highest. <strong>Marketers</strong> recognize<br />

the key attributes needed <strong>to</strong> evolve their marketing strategies. Marketing<br />

services providers add the most value by developing specialized processes<br />

and technology that cater <strong>to</strong> the current and emerging needs of marketers.<br />

<strong>Marketers</strong> also say ease-of-use and integrated analytics matter most<br />

when using technology platforms. This is likely because of marketers’ need<br />

<strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> turn their data in<strong>to</strong> action in order <strong>to</strong> gain a more consistent<br />

view of their cus<strong>to</strong>mers.<br />

It’s perhaps not surprising marketers ranked reporting so high because<br />

they need <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> access and analyze data <strong>to</strong> derive insights which<br />

influence communication strategies.<br />

Ease of use<br />

<strong>Report</strong>ing<br />

Integrated analytics<br />

Available features<br />

Stability<br />

Scalability<br />

Platform speed<br />

App responsiveness<br />

Supported channels<br />

3.9<br />

6.0<br />

5.6<br />

5.5<br />

5.1<br />

5.0<br />

4.8<br />

4.5<br />

4.5 3.5<br />

Takeaway:<br />

Brands see value in marketing technology and service providers, and<br />

favor providers that offer integrated reporting and analytics. Most<br />

marketers admit that they struggle <strong>with</strong> personalized content and<br />

gaining a complete view of their cus<strong>to</strong>mers. They realize marketing<br />

technology and service providers can help them close this gap.<br />

pg. 9


Conclusion<br />

Brands are on the right track <strong>with</strong> their <strong>2017</strong> marketing plans. They<br />

know improving the cus<strong>to</strong>mer experience will require enhancing tried<br />

and true marketing tactics.<br />

But the right mindset is not enough. Smart marketers will look <strong>to</strong><br />

marketing technology and service providers that provide the capabilities<br />

necessary <strong>to</strong> execute highly personalized, cross-channel marketing<br />

tactics. The right partner can seamlessly integrate email, display, SMS,<br />

push, and social channels, <strong>to</strong> deliver unified cus<strong>to</strong>mer experiences.<br />

Every consumer’s digital world is saturated <strong>with</strong> marketing messages,<br />

making it important for brands <strong>to</strong> invest in the technology and<br />

partnerships necessary <strong>to</strong> make them stand out.<br />

Lastly, <strong>to</strong> take full advantage of a marketing technology platform,<br />

marketers must first pinpoint the issues that need <strong>to</strong> be solved. Too<br />

often, brands invest in costly technology <strong>with</strong>out setting measurable,<br />

achievable goals beforehand.<br />

The future looks bright for marketers that plan <strong>to</strong> implement pragmatic<br />

changes <strong>with</strong>in their marketing strategies. Those that strategically<br />

break the mold will remain competitive in the year ahead. Brands that<br />

fail <strong>to</strong> master basic tactics and jump <strong>to</strong> complex strategies <strong>to</strong>o quickly<br />

will likely see obstacles along the way.<br />

Cross-channel marketing does not have <strong>to</strong> be complicated. Invest in<br />

the right <strong>to</strong>ols, set achievable goals and build your strategy <strong>with</strong> the<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mer in mind.<br />

pg. 10


Methodology<br />

Yes Lifecycle Marketing surveyed more than 300 marketing<br />

professionals at the National Retail Federation’s Shop.org Digital<br />

Summit in September of 2016 and online in Oc<strong>to</strong>ber of 2016. The<br />

breakdown of job titles is as follows:<br />

What is your job title?<br />

Manager 35%<br />

Direc<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Coordina<strong>to</strong>r/ specialist<br />

Other<br />

Vice President<br />

CMO<br />

10%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

23%<br />

22%<br />

2.9<br />

About Yes Lifecycle Marketing<br />

Yes Lifecycle Marketing turns data in<strong>to</strong> action across every cus<strong>to</strong>mer<br />

interaction, generating superior results. We do this by transforming<br />

brands in<strong>to</strong> true insights-driven businesses by linking insights and<br />

continuous learning, empowering them <strong>to</strong> make better, smarter, and<br />

faster decisions. To learn more, call 1-877-937-6245 or email<br />

sales@yeslifecyclemarketing.com.<br />

pg. 11


1-877-937-6245 sales@yeslifecyclemarketing.com yeslifecyclemarketing.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!