03.04.2017 Views

INVESTIGATION

2otjd1f

2otjd1f

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CASE 1<br />

A Catastrophic Outcome<br />

Narrative<br />

A small, laden cement carrier capsized while<br />

on passage through a coastal channel that<br />

was notorious for its powerful tidal races and<br />

associated extreme sea conditions.<br />

As the vessel approached the channel, the<br />

weather deteriorated and gale force winds<br />

were opposing the strong tidal stream; this<br />

was creating treacherous conditions that were<br />

dangerous for small vessels. On entering<br />

the channel, it is evident from AIS evidence<br />

that the bridge team slowed the vessel down,<br />

almost certainly to reduce the risk of pounding<br />

or ploughing as they headed into the dreadful<br />

sea conditions (Figure 1). Due to the direction<br />

of the tidal stream, it is also evident that<br />

course alterations were required to maintain<br />

a safe navigational track over the ground.<br />

However, these course changes had the effect<br />

of placing the large sea increasingly on the<br />

vessel’s beam.<br />

When close to the area of worst sea conditions,<br />

the vessel capsized and remained afloat upside<br />

down for a considerable period of time; none<br />

of the crew survived. The alarm was not raised<br />

until about 25 hours later when the upturned<br />

hull was spotted by a passing ferry (Figure 2).<br />

The accident had gone unnoticed because: the<br />

capsize was so rapid that there was insufficient<br />

time for the crew to call a “Mayday”, the<br />

EPIRB almost certainly became trapped and<br />

did not float free, and the AIS transmissions<br />

ceasing was not observed ashore.<br />

The hazards presented by the tidal races were<br />

well publicised and the channel was impassable<br />

to small vessels during certain tidal conditions.<br />

The ship and its master had passed through the<br />

channel many times before and the master had<br />

previously taken action, normally by altering<br />

course, to avoid entering the channel at the<br />

dangerous times. About 3 months prior to the<br />

accident, the master had altered course across<br />

the sea in the approaches to the channel in<br />

order to avoid the extreme tidal races; however,<br />

this caused the vessel’s cement cargo to shift<br />

and resulted in a dangerous stability situation.<br />

Direction of wind and<br />

very heavy seas<br />

Direction of tidal stream<br />

Figure 1: Vessel's track showing headings through the water (vessel shown 10 times actual size)<br />

4<br />

MAIB Safety Digest 1/2017

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!