Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CASE 4<br />
No Pool Attendant, No Rescue<br />
Narrative<br />
A passenger was noticed lying motionless at<br />
the bottom of a swimming pool. He had been<br />
under water in the unsupervised pool for 10<br />
minutes before a fellow passenger saw him and<br />
recovered him to the surface.<br />
The alarm was raised and, following his<br />
removal from the water, CPR was started<br />
by fellow passengers until the ship’s medical<br />
team arrived shortly afterwards. Despite<br />
further attempts to resuscitate him, he was<br />
pronounced deceased by the ship’s senior<br />
doctor.<br />
At the time of the accident, there were at least<br />
four other passengers in the swimming pool.<br />
The subsequent autopsy examination<br />
determined the cause of death as drowning.<br />
The Lessons<br />
1. It is unknown whether or not the<br />
passenger’s life could have been saved had<br />
an emergency response been initiated<br />
sooner. As there was no dedicated pool<br />
attendant, his situation was not identified<br />
until 10 minutes had passed.<br />
2. Although patrolling personnel can provide<br />
a degree of swimming pool supervision,<br />
this accident demonstrates that, ideally,<br />
constant supervision is required to<br />
effectively identify and respond to a<br />
passenger in immediate risk of drowning.<br />
3. No formal documented risk assessment<br />
for swimming pool use was in place at<br />
the time of the accident. Although a risk<br />
assessment might not have prevented the<br />
accident, it would have identified relevant<br />
hazards and control measures, including<br />
those aimed at reducing the risk of a<br />
passenger drowning.<br />
4. The frequency of near drownings<br />
in unsupervised swimming pools is<br />
uncertain. It is therefore important that<br />
this uncertainty is taken into account<br />
when conducting risk assessments and<br />
justifying any decision not to provide<br />
constant supervision.<br />
10<br />
MAIB Safety Digest 1/2017