18.04.2017 Views

Mid Rivers Newsmagazine 4-19-17

Local news, local politics and community events for St. Charles County Missouri.

Local news, local politics and community events for St. Charles County Missouri.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FACEBOOK.COM/MIDRIVERSNEWSMAGAZINE<br />

MIDRIVERSNEWSMAGAZINE.COM<br />

JOHN Stossel<br />

April <strong>19</strong>, 20<strong>17</strong><br />

MID RIVERS NEWSMAGAZINE<br />

I OPINION I 3<br />

TREE SERVICE<br />

Warrior Trump<br />

Somehow, firing Tomahawk missiles at<br />

Syria suddenly changed people’s opinions<br />

of President Trump. Now they call him a<br />

“serious” leader.<br />

William Kristol said Trump’s action<br />

“reassures you.”<br />

Senators Lindsey Graham and John<br />

McCain, long critical of Trump, now say<br />

he “deserves the support of the American<br />

people.”<br />

Politicians from France, the U.K., the<br />

EU, Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Australia<br />

expressed their support. So did Hillary<br />

Clinton.<br />

“Why is war such an alluring illusion?”<br />

asks Jeffrey Tucker, of the Foundation for<br />

Economic Education. “Good intentions are<br />

never enough to justify government intervention<br />

in anything. This is especially true<br />

in war, the meanest, deadliest and most<br />

destructive government program ever conceived.<br />

And yet we keep doing it.”<br />

Trump says pictures of Syrian children<br />

killed by nerve gas moved him to order the<br />

attack. His supporters say launching the<br />

missiles was the “moral” thing to do.<br />

But Syria’s dictator killed more children<br />

in the past.<br />

In 2013, after a horrible chemical attack,<br />

Trump tweeted, “Do not attack Syria.<br />

There is no upside and tremendous downside<br />

... If the U.S. attacks Syria and hits the<br />

wrong targets, killing civilians, there will<br />

be worldwide hell to pay. Stay away.”<br />

Fortunately, it appears that these missile<br />

strikes didn’t kill civilians. But four years<br />

ago, Trump also said, “What will we get<br />

for bombing Syria besides more debt and a<br />

possible long term conflict?”<br />

What changed? Just seeing pictures on<br />

TV?<br />

For years, we’ve tried to sort out who is<br />

on which side in Syria. Last week’s attack<br />

was an awfully fast switch to military<br />

action.<br />

Both Democratic and Republican interventionists<br />

focus on Assad as the bad guy.<br />

Many say getting rid of him will make the<br />

Syrian public less likely to side with ISIS.<br />

Maybe. But they’ve been completely<br />

wrong before about the aftermath of war. In<br />

Syria, dozens of factions are fighting each<br />

other. We don’t know the motives of all of<br />

them. Some rebels Assad wants to crush<br />

are openly allied with ISIS.<br />

None of this makes Assad a good guy,<br />

but it means we don’t know what will<br />

replace him if he gets toppled. Fourteen<br />

years ago, many people thought nothing<br />

could be worse for Iraq than Saddam Hussein.<br />

The groups unleashed when Saddam<br />

fell were worse.<br />

Before that, our support of “freedom<br />

fighters” in Afghanistan helped arm the<br />

Taliban and eventually ISIS. Today, they<br />

kill Americans with weapons American<br />

taxpayers paid for.<br />

In Libya, Tucker reminds us, “The U.S.<br />

intervened with airstrikes to overthrow<br />

a terrible dictator but instead of unleashing<br />

freedom, the results unleashed a terror<br />

army that continues to spread violence and<br />

death ... It is not enough merely to bomb<br />

a government or regime into disgrace,<br />

resignation or obliteration. It is grossly<br />

irresponsible not to ask the question: what<br />

comes after?”<br />

We don’t even know for certain that it<br />

was the Syrian president who used nerve<br />

gas.<br />

He claims his regime attacked anti-government<br />

militias with conventional bombs,<br />

and one must have hit gas that the militias<br />

themselves stored.<br />

I don’t know if that’s true, but I have a<br />

hard time being as confident as people like<br />

John McCain about what’s going on over<br />

in the <strong>Mid</strong>dle East.<br />

Even if Assad was responsible for the<br />

nerve gas, it’s not obvious that using nerve<br />

gas is a more horrendous crime than fighting<br />

wars by other means. Nearly everyone<br />

seems to think so, and chemical weapons<br />

do drift in the air, making them more likely<br />

to kill civilians. But families torn apart by<br />

conventional bombs take little consolation<br />

in knowing that what killed their relatives<br />

wasn’t poison gas.<br />

If Trump turns out to be like most past<br />

presidents, he’ll see his popularity rise<br />

because he took military action. George<br />

W. Bush’s approval rating spiked 10 percent<br />

after he invaded Iraq. When his father<br />

invaded, his approval rating jumped 28<br />

percent.<br />

Trump loves being popular. I fear his<br />

new slogan may be “Syria first, then North<br />

Korea, then...”<br />

© 20<strong>17</strong> Creators.com<br />

SPECIAL<br />

SPRING<br />

RATES<br />

Call For Details<br />

Located in St. Peters • Owners: Tom & Greg

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!