08 Assessment of volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44. Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Cameron<br />
PA, Cooper DJ et al (2014) Goal-directed resuscitation<br />
for patients with early septic shock. N Engl<br />
J Med 371:1496–1506<br />
45. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C,<br />
Teboul JL (2003) Global end-diastolic <strong>volume</strong> as an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> cardiac preload <strong>in</strong> patients with septic<br />
shock. Chest 124:1900–19<strong>08</strong><br />
46. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B (20<strong>08</strong>) Does central venous<br />
pressure predict <strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong>? A systematic<br />
review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> tale <strong>of</strong> seven<br />
mares. Chest 134:172–178<br />
47. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R (2013) Does <strong>the</strong> central venous<br />
pressure predict <strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong>? An updated<br />
meta-analysis <strong>and</strong> a plea for some common<br />
sense. Crit Care Med 41:1774–1781<br />
48. Cannesson M, Rams<strong>in</strong>gh D, R<strong>in</strong>ehart J, Demirjian<br />
A, Vu T, Vakharia S et al (2015) Perioperative goaldirected<br />
<strong>the</strong>rapy <strong>and</strong> postoperative outcomes <strong>in</strong><br />
patients undergo<strong>in</strong>g high-risk abdom<strong>in</strong>al surgery:<br />
a historical-prospective, comparative effectiveness<br />
study. Crit Care 19:261<br />
49. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard<br />
C, P<strong>in</strong>sky MR et al (2006) Passive leg rais<strong>in</strong>g predicts<br />
<strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> critically ill. Crit<br />
Care Med 34:1402–1407<br />
50. Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C, Monnet X (2009) Passive<br />
leg rais<strong>in</strong>g for predict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong>:<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> postural change. Intensive Care<br />
Med 35:85–90<br />
51. Monnet X, Teboul JL (20<strong>08</strong>) Passive leg rais<strong>in</strong>g. Intensive<br />
Care Med 34:659–663<br />
52. Preau S, Saulnier F, Dewavr<strong>in</strong> F, Durocher A, Chagnon<br />
JL (2010) Passive leg rais<strong>in</strong>g is predictive <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong> <strong>in</strong> spontaneously breath<strong>in</strong>g<br />
patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.<br />
Crit Care Med 38:819–825<br />
53. Teboul JL, Monnet X (20<strong>08</strong>) Prediction <strong>of</strong> <strong>volume</strong><br />
<strong>responsiveness</strong> <strong>in</strong> critically ill patients with spontaneous<br />
breath<strong>in</strong>g activity. Curr Op<strong>in</strong> Crit Care<br />
14:334–339<br />
54. Monnet X, Teboul JL (2015) Passive leg rais<strong>in</strong>g: five<br />
rules, not a drop <strong>of</strong> <strong>fluid</strong>! Crit Care 19:18<br />
55. Cavallaro F, S<strong>and</strong>roni C, Marano C, La Torre G, Mannocci<br />
A, De Waure C et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy<br />
<strong>of</strong> passive leg rais<strong>in</strong>g for prediction <strong>of</strong> <strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> adults: systematic review <strong>and</strong> meta-analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical studies. Intensive Care Med<br />
36:1475–1483<br />
56. AWMF (2014) Intravasale Volumen<strong>the</strong>rapie beim<br />
Erwachsenen. Leitl<strong>in</strong>iendetailansicht. www.awmf.<br />
org/leitl<strong>in</strong>ien/detail/ll/001-020.html. Accessed 12<br />
Oct 2015<br />
57. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefevre D, Runge I,<br />
Legras A, Dequ<strong>in</strong> PF et al (2012) Brachial cuff measurements<br />
<strong>of</strong> blood pressure dur<strong>in</strong>g passive leg<br />
rais<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong> prediction. Ann Fr<br />
Anesth Reanim 31:e67–e72<br />
58. Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D, Richard<br />
C, Teboul JL (2007) Echocardiographic prediction<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>volume</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong> <strong>in</strong> critically ill patients<br />
with spontaneously breath<strong>in</strong>g activity. Intensive<br />
Care Med 33:1125–1132<br />
59. Delerme S, Renault R, Le Manach Y, Lvovschi V,<br />
Bendahou M, Riou B et al (2007) Variations <strong>in</strong> pulse<br />
oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced by passive leg rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> spontaneously<br />
breath<strong>in</strong>g volunteers. Am J Emerg Med 25:637–<br />
642<br />
60. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A (2011) What is a<br />
<strong>fluid</strong> challenge? Curr Op<strong>in</strong> Crit Care 17:290–295<br />
61. V<strong>in</strong>cent JL, Weil MH (2006) Fluid challenge revisited.<br />
Crit Care Med 34:1333–1337<br />
62. Cherpanath TG, Aarts LP, Groeneveld JA, Geerts BF<br />
(2014) Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong>: a guide to<br />
patient-tailored <strong>volume</strong> titration. J Cardiothorac<br />
Vasc Anesth 28:745–754<br />
63. Michard F, Teboul JL (2002) Predict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> ICU patients: a critical analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> evidence. Chest 121:2000–20<strong>08</strong><br />
64. Muller L, Louart G, Teboul JL, Mahamat A, Polge A,<br />
Bert<strong>in</strong>chant JP et al (2009) Could B-type Natriuretic<br />
Peptide (BNP) plasma concentration be useful to<br />
predict <strong>fluid</strong> <strong>responsiveness</strong> [corrected] <strong>in</strong> critically<br />
ill patients with acute circulatory failure? Ann Fr<br />
Anesth Reanim 28:531–536<br />
65. Araghi A, B<strong>and</strong>er JJ, Guzman JA (2006) Arterial<br />
blood pressure monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> overweight critically<br />
ill patients: <strong>in</strong>vasive or non<strong>in</strong>vasive? Crit Care<br />
10:R64<br />
66. Anastas ZM, Jimerson E, Garolis S (20<strong>08</strong>) Comparison<br />
<strong>of</strong> non<strong>in</strong>vasive blood pressure measurements<br />
<strong>in</strong> patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Nurs<br />
23:519–524 (quiz 25–26)<br />
67. Lehman LW, Saeed M, Talmor D, Mark R, Malhotra<br />
A (2013) Methods <strong>of</strong> blood pressure measurement<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ICU. Crit Care Med 41:34–40<br />
68. Wagner JY, Prantner JS, Meidert AS, Hapfelmeier<br />
A, Schmid RM, Saugel B (2014) Non<strong>in</strong>vasive cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
versus <strong>in</strong>termittent arterial pressure monitor<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vascular unload<strong>in</strong>g technique<br />
(CNAP device) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>emergency</strong> <strong>department</strong>.<br />
Sc<strong>and</strong> J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 22:8<br />
69. Nowak RM, Sen A, Garcia AJ, Wilkie H, Yang JJ,<br />
Nowak MR et al (2011) Non<strong>in</strong>vasive cont<strong>in</strong>uous or<br />
<strong>in</strong>termittent blood pressure <strong>and</strong> heart rate patient<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ED. Am J Emerg Med 29:782–<br />
789<br />
70. Saugel B, Dueck R, Wagner JY (2014) Measurement<br />
<strong>of</strong> blood pressure. Best Pract Res Cl<strong>in</strong> Anaes<strong>the</strong>siol<br />
28:309–322<br />
71. Saugel B, Meidert AS, Hapfelmeier A, Eyer F,<br />
Schmid RM, Huber W (2013) Non-<strong>in</strong>vasive cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
arterial pressure measurement based on radial<br />
artery tonometry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit:<br />
a method comparison study us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> T-L<strong>in</strong>e TL-<br />
200pro device. Br J Anaesth 111:185–190<br />
72. Meidert AS, Huber W, Muller JN, Sch<strong>of</strong>thaler M,<br />
Hapfelmeier A, Langwieser N et al (2014) Radial<br />
artery applanation tonometry for cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
non-<strong>in</strong>vasive arterial pressure monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />
care unit patients: comparison with <strong>in</strong>vasively<br />
assessed radial arterial pressure. Br J Anaesth<br />
112:521–528<br />
73. Saugel B, Meidert AS, Langwieser N, Wagner JY,<br />
Fassio F, Hapfelmeier A et al (2014) An autocalibrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
algorithm for non-<strong>in</strong>vasive cardiac output<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ation based on <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> an arterial<br />
pressure waveform recorded with radial artery<br />
applanation tonometry: a pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> concept pilot<br />
analysis. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Monit Comput 28:357–362<br />
74. Wagner JY, Sarwari H, Schon G, Kubik M, Kluge S,<br />
Reichenspurner H et al (2015) Radial artery applanation<br />
tonometry for cont<strong>in</strong>uous non<strong>in</strong>vasive cardiac<br />
output measurement: a comparison with <strong>in</strong>termittent<br />
pulmonary artery <strong>the</strong>rmodilution <strong>in</strong> patients<br />
after cardiothoracic surgery. Crit Care Med<br />
43:1423–1428<br />
75. Saugel B, Cecconi M, Wagner JY, Reuter DA (2015)<br />
Non<strong>in</strong>vasive cont<strong>in</strong>uous cardiac output monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> perioperative <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive care medic<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Br J Anaesth 114:562–575<br />
76. Cecconi M, Monge Garcia MI, Gracia Romero M,<br />
Mell<strong>in</strong>gh<strong>of</strong>f J, Cali<strong>and</strong>ro F, Grounds RM et al (2015)<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> pulse pressure variation <strong>and</strong> stroke <strong>volume</strong><br />
variation <strong>in</strong> spontaneously breath<strong>in</strong>g patients<br />
to assess dynamic arterial elastance <strong>and</strong> to predict<br />
arterial pressure response to <strong>fluid</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istration.<br />
Anesth Analg 120(1):76–84<br />
77. Saugel B, Reuter DA (2014) Are we ready for <strong>the</strong><br />
age <strong>of</strong> non-<strong>in</strong>vasive haemodynamic monitor<strong>in</strong>g?<br />
Br J Anaesth 113:340–343<br />
78. Wagner JY, Saugel B (2015) When should we adopt<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous non<strong>in</strong>vasive hemodynamic monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technologies <strong>in</strong>to cl<strong>in</strong>ical rout<strong>in</strong>e? J Cl<strong>in</strong> Monit<br />
Comput 29:1–3<br />
Mediz<strong>in</strong>ische Kl<strong>in</strong>ik - Intensivmediz<strong>in</strong> und Notfallmediz<strong>in</strong> 4 · 2017 |<br />
333