12.12.2012 Views

Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report - Biodiversity Foundation for Africa

Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report - Biodiversity Foundation for Africa

Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report - Biodiversity Foundation for Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.1 <strong>Ecoregion</strong> Boundary<br />

3. BIOLOGICAL FEATURES AND SPECIES<br />

<strong>Miombo</strong> <strong>Ecoregion</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, page 18<br />

The revised <strong>Miombo</strong> <strong>Ecoregion</strong>, also termed the Southern Caesalpinoid woodlands, is an<br />

amalgamation of a number of the smaller ecoregions shown on the WWF-US Conservation<br />

Science Programme map "Terrestrial <strong>Ecoregion</strong>s of <strong>Africa</strong>" (WWF 1999). It is a broad,<br />

heterogeneous region that covers a large part of south-central <strong>Africa</strong>, but with many internal<br />

similarities and links. In many respects the revised <strong>Miombo</strong> <strong>Ecoregion</strong> can be considered a<br />

"super ecoregion" or biome.<br />

This super-ecoregion is a broader unit than true miombo woodland (defined as woodland<br />

dominated by trees of the genera Brachystegia, Julbernardia and Isoberlinia with a welldeveloped<br />

grass layer), and is defined by the dominance (or high frequency) of trees belonging to<br />

the legume sub-family Caesalpinioideae, such as Brachystegia, Julbernardia, Isoberlinia,<br />

Baikiaea, Cryptosepalum, Colophospermum and Burkea. Its distribution and subdivisions are<br />

shown in Figure 4.<br />

White's original vegetation map (White 1983) was used as a basis <strong>for</strong> the revision, modified<br />

using a number of national and regional studies 1 . The final map closely follows the boundaries of<br />

the White's Zambezian Regional Centre of Endemism, except <strong>for</strong> the transition to the Guinea-<br />

Congolia and Zanzibar-Inhambane phytochoria. It also broadly corresponds to the broad-leaved<br />

dystrophic savanna woodlands of southern <strong>Africa</strong> (Huntley 1982).<br />

The revised <strong>Miombo</strong> <strong>Ecoregion</strong> extends from the upper edge of the Angolan escarpment in the<br />

west to the beginnings of the coastal woodlands and <strong>for</strong>ests of Mozambique and Tanzania in the<br />

east (Southern Zanzibar–Inhambane coastal <strong>for</strong>est mosaic of Burgess et al. 2004), although it<br />

does not include those types. To the west and southwest it is bounded by Kalahari Acacia<br />

woodlands in Namibia and Botswana (Kalahari Acacia–Baikiaea Woodlands of WWF, in part),<br />

and to the south by Highveld grassland and mixed Acacia woodland in South <strong>Africa</strong> (Highveld<br />

Grasslands of WWF). To the north it grades into Guinea-Congolian moist evergreen <strong>for</strong>est of the<br />

Congo Basin (Southern Congolian Forest–Savanna Mosaic of WWF), while in the north-east it is<br />

bounded by dry Acacia-Commiphora bushland in Tanzania (Southern Acacia–Commiphora<br />

Bushlands and Thickets of WWF). Nomenclature of the revised units is quite different from that<br />

of the original WWF map, and in many cases the units are substantially different. A comparison<br />

with the WWF-US <strong>Ecoregion</strong> map is given in Table 1. The total area of the <strong>Miombo</strong> ecoregion<br />

(excluding water bodies and mountains) is 3,649,568 km 2 .<br />

3.1.1 Inclusions and Exclusions<br />

Although within the geographical extent of the southern Caesalpinoid woodlands, Afromontane<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests and grassland (units 76, 77, 78, 80 (part) of WWF) are excluded from the biological and<br />

other descriptions of the ecoregion. Their ecology and species composition are very different.<br />

Also excluded are large water bodies such as lakes Kariba, Malawi and Tanganyika have been<br />

excluded.<br />

1 National and regional studies used were: Acocks 1975, Barbosa 1970, Bekker & de Wit 1991, Giess 1971, C. Hines<br />

(pers. comm. 2002), Low & Rebelo 1998, Mendelsohn & Roberts 1997, Mendelsohn et al. 2000, Pedro & Barbosa<br />

1955, Timberlake et al. 1993, Timberlake et al. 1994, Wild & Barbosa 1967.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!