09.08.2017 Views

SACOME Annual Report 2015-16

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POLICY<br />

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission<br />

<strong>SACOME</strong> played a significant role in the decision to hold a Royal<br />

Commission into the Nuclear Fuel Cycle through its surveys<br />

and analysis of attitudes to uranium and nuclear energy, which<br />

demonstrated that the public is ready for a mature discussion on this<br />

important topic.<br />

by providing a submission detailing hydraulic fracturing science<br />

and facts. <strong>SACOME</strong> presented to the committee in September <strong>2015</strong>,<br />

highlighting the misconceptions that have shaped the debate and<br />

emphasising that experience and monitoring have repeatedly shown<br />

no impacts that endorse the concerns. <strong>SACOME</strong> will again present to<br />

the committee when the final report is released in October 20<strong>16</strong>.<br />

Advocating for a mature debate into SA<br />

increasing its participation in the nuclear<br />

fuel cycle is a key <strong>SACOME</strong> position.<br />

The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission (NFCRC) released four issues<br />

papers in July <strong>2015</strong> which <strong>SACOME</strong> responded to, also providing a<br />

submission to the Royal Commission’s tentative findings released in<br />

February 20<strong>16</strong>.<br />

<strong>SACOME</strong> Chief Executive Jason Kuchel<br />

visited New York state and Pennsylvania to<br />

understand fracking perceptions in these<br />

areas. He found community members<br />

nearby were not adverse, with objections<br />

to the technology largely from minorities in<br />

neighbouring cities.<br />

In the final NFCRC report released in May 20<strong>16</strong>, <strong>SACOME</strong> was pleased<br />

to see its recommendations for the reform of uranium mining<br />

approvals heeded, including the removal of impediments in the<br />

relevant State and Federal Acts.<br />

The Royal Commission agreed there is scope<br />

to expand the uranium mining industry<br />

in SA and we can be a major contributor to<br />

global emissions reductions through nuclear<br />

power.<br />

Fracking Inquiry<br />

In 2014 the Natural Resources Committee announced a parliamentary<br />

inquiry into the potential risks and impacts in the use of hydraulic<br />

fracture stimulation (fracking). <strong>SACOME</strong> responded to this inquiry<br />

Air Quality<br />

Early in 20<strong>16</strong>, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) released<br />

the draft Environmental Protection (Air Quality) Policy 20<strong>16</strong>. After the<br />

work that <strong>SACOME</strong> had undertaken on Air Quality policy in 2014-15,<br />

the Chamber was able to provide a comprehensive response to the<br />

draft policy. The area of particular concern was changes to Maximum<br />

Pollutant Levels (MPL) which would potentially add regulatory burden<br />

in the areas of monitoring, reporting, and independent verifications of<br />

particulate matter, specifically PM10 and PM2.5. .<br />

<strong>SACOME</strong>’s advocacy also resulted in changes to the MPL for stack<br />

emissions to take into consideration the actual impact (or lack of ) at<br />

receptor sites. In relation to particulate matter, <strong>SACOME</strong> emphasised<br />

the inappropriate application of the Ambient Air Quality National<br />

Environment Protection Measure (NEPM) to monitor and manage<br />

point source emissions. <strong>SACOME</strong> is continuing to work with the EPA<br />

and DSD to refine the policy and ensure guidelines are risk based, and<br />

NEPM standards not considered absolute.<br />

Native Vegetation<br />

The <strong>2015</strong>-<strong>16</strong> period saw a number of changes to the native vegetation<br />

framework in South Australia with the Department of Environment,<br />

Water & Natural Resources (DEWNR) in continual dialogue with<br />

<strong>SACOME</strong> on the redevelopment of legislation, regulations and<br />

policy associated with native vegetation. Among these was a review<br />

of policy and guides for Significant Environmental Benefits (SEBs).<br />

<strong>SACOME</strong> highlighted in its submission the need for policy flexibility to<br />

enable positive environmental outcomes, while facilitating resources<br />

sector growth, consistent with the SA Government’s economic and<br />

strategic priorities.<br />

<strong>SACOME</strong> also provided feedback on the draft Native Vegetation<br />

Regulations 20<strong>16</strong> (SA) and the Guide to the draft regulations, with a<br />

comprehensive submission developed in conjunction with <strong>SACOME</strong>’s<br />

Sustainable Development Committee.<br />

Nature Foundation SA<br />

<strong>SACOME</strong> emphasised the need for<br />

transparency in the allocations of money<br />

from the Native Vegetation Fund, as public<br />

reporting on the KPI’s of projects and their<br />

delivery is essential for industry confidence<br />

in the management of funds.<br />

12 South Australian Chamber of Mines and Energy<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 20<strong>16</strong> 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!