Independent 20170816-readme.ng

INDEPENDENT WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2017
/<strong>Independent</strong>ngr @independentngr www.independent.ng
C3
Real Estate
Supreme Court Validates
Family's Right To Ogun Land
EMMANUEL BADEJO
LAGOS
Amosun
Members of Somolu
Okunseide family
of Ogun State have
gotten the Supreme
Court verdict validating their
ownership to a large parcel of
landed property located within
a sprawling township in
Ogun State.
They, including Aremu
Yeku, Jide Kotoye, and Ayinde
Showunmi for Somolu
Okunseide recently won a
legal battle against representatives
of Adejonlu Abinu
family of Ibasa, Igaun, Ogun
State.
Although the family of
Adejonlu Abinu family represented
by Adejonlu, Adisa
Ade, Kola Oso and Sunmonu
Seidu, were the appellants,
they, however, lost the battle
to the Somolu Okunseide
family.
Essentially, the appeal borders
on declaration of title
to land.
Before the apex’s court,
the appeal was against the
ruling of Ogun State High
Court sitting Abeokuta delivered
on the 21st day of
October, 1988 dismissing the
claim of the appellants then
plaintiffs.
The appellants as plaintiffs
commenced the action
by writ of summons before
the High Court of Ogun
State, Otta Judicial Division
in suit No. HCT/5/85 claiming
against the defendants
(now respondents) that the
defendants, were their native
customary tenants in
respect of the land occupied
for farming by them at Ibasa,
Iganun Village of Ogun
State.
They, having denied and
still denied the plaintiffs’
title and claimed and still
claimed to be the absolute
owners of the said premises
and the land thereto contrary
to native law and custom.
The position of the appellants
as seen from their
pleadings and evidence were
that their progenitor migrated
from Ile-Ife, settled on the
land in dispute called Ibasa.
The appellants pleaded
further that after their several
years of settlement and
farming at Ibasa, the Odeyale
came to settle with Adejonlu
and the said Odeyale was settled
at Olowotedo.
Thereafter, they claimed
that, Odeleye, who in company
of his brother, Yeku came
to settle with Odeyale who
after abandoning his former
settlement at Olowotedo, settled
at Ibasa.
The appellants, therefore,
claimed that these three
brothers were their customary
tenants.
The defendants/respondents
who laid claim to a wider
area of land defended the
action for themselves and on
behalf of Somolu/Okuseinde
family and asserted that Somolu
was the original owner
of the land in dispute.
They also based their case
on traditional evidence based
on settlement as well as act
of ownership and not only
denied the historical facts set
up by the appellants, which
purportedly linked them
with appellants’ ancestors
but also vehemently denied
the issue of customary tenancy.
The respondents pleaded
that their ancestor Somolu
originally settled on a vast
parcel of land, which included
the land in dispute.
While the plaintiffs called
seven witnesses before closing
their case, the defendants
called five witnesses.
Counsel for the parties
thereafter addressed the
court.
In his address, at the end
of the oral testimonies,
counsel for the defendants
contended that the plaintiffs
failed to establish that they
(the defendants) were their
customary tenants at Ibasa.
He explained that the ancestors
of the defendants settled
thereat. He pointed out
that the plaintiffs and their
witnesses confirmed that the
ancestors of the defendants,
namely, Odeyale and Odeleye
founded Olowotedo and created
Oluweri Stream or river.
Contrariwise, counsel for
the plaintiffs urged the court
to find that they made out a
case that it was the plaintiffs'
ancestors, namely, Abinu and
Adetonlu, who first settled
on the land, having migrated
from Ile Ife, stopping over
at Ijebu Ode. They finally,
settled down at the land in
dispute.
In a reserved judgment
delivered by the Ogun State
High Court on October 21,
1988, the High Court found
that the traditional evidence
Drawing conclusion
from the submissions
by the parties, Justice
Chima Nweze, in his
lead judgment said
it was clear from the
traditional evidence
of both parties that
the evidence of the
defendants by far
outweighed those
of the plaintiffs
and that will entitle
the defendants to
judgment
Nweze
called by the defendants outweighed
those of the plaintiffs.
The court conclusively
dismissed the plaintiffs' case
and entered judgment in favour
of the defendants.
Unsatisfied, the plaintiffs
appealed to the Court of Appeal,
Ibadan.
And after hearing arguments
for and against, the
Court of Appeal dismissed
the appeal on the ground that
it was devoid of merit.
According to the Court of
Appeal, there was no legal
basis to disturb the findings
of facts of the trial Judge.
Aggrieved, the appellants
filed a further appeal to the
Supreme Court by way of
application for leave, which
was granted and notice of
appeal was filed. A motion
for interlocutory injunction
was also filed to restrain the
respondents from continuing
the sales and trespass on the
land subject matter of the appeal
pending the final determination
of the appeal.
In reaction, the respondents
filed a notice of preliminary
objection and
appellants filed a counter
affidavit.
Set out as issues for resolution
are whether having
regard to the pleadings and
totality of evidence adduced,
the court below was right in
dismissing the appellants'
appeal?
Like the trial Court, the
Court of Appeal also dismissed
the Plaintiffs' appeal
to it from the said judgment.
This further appeal to
this Court is the appellants
expression of their disavowal
of the validity of the reasoning
of the lower Courts
judgment.
Although three issues
were originally formulated
in the brief of argument filed
on May 14, 2012, counsel for
the appellants abandoned the
second and third issues at the
hearing of the appeal on November
29, 2016. They were
accordingly, struck out.
Drawing conclusion from
the submissions by the parties,
Justice Chima Nweze,
in his lead judgment said it
was clear from the traditional
evidence of both parties
that the evidence of the defendants
by far outweighed
those of the plaintiffs and
that will entitle the defendants
to judgment.
According to him, the
plaintiffs have failed to discharge
the onus placed on
them...
“In all, I find no scintilla
of merit in the appellants’
complaint against the judgment
of the lower court. I,
therefore, unhesitatingly enter
an order dismissing this
appeal”, he concluded.
Their lordships including
Mary Peter-Odili, Kumai
Aka’ahs, Kudirat Kekere-
Ekun and Ejembi Eko, who
agreed with the lead verdict,
unanimously dismissed the
appeal.