18.08.2017 Views

Martin Luther

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MARTIN LUTHER: THE RELUCTANT REVOLUTIONARY<br />

PROF. M. M. NINAN<br />

Transubstantiation<br />

Eucharist is more than a mere commemoration or symbol. While Catholics believe that the bread<br />

and wine literally becomes the body and blood of Jesus - known as “trans-substantiation”<br />

<strong>Luther</strong>ans also believe in co-substantiation that the bread and wine retain their outward<br />

characteristics, but of the body and blood of Christ are present alongside the substance of the<br />

bread and wine. Later <strong>Luther</strong>ans used the word Sacramental Union, where the Real Presence is<br />

only as a sort of extension of the Incarnation, a precise presence pro nobis, a presence bringing<br />

grace for the forgiveness of sins. Consequently, in the Eucharistic Sacrament, Christ unites his<br />

Body with the bread and wine (doctrine of "consubstantiation"), thereby making his omnipresence<br />

perceptible to us and salvific for us (doctrine of ubiquitarianism).<br />

Therefore, considering the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist from the perspective of his two<br />

natures, <strong>Luther</strong> maintained that after the consecration, the bread and wine retain their own<br />

properties, but united with the Body and Blood of the Lord they constitute a true sacramental unity.<br />

Christ's presence in the Sacrament is an abstraction. The bread and wine becomes for the believer<br />

the body and blood of Jesus.<br />

Thus, <strong>Luther</strong> categorically denied the ontological mutation of the species of the bread and<br />

wine through "transubstantiation".<br />

<strong>Luther</strong>, Calvin and Zwingli totally rejected the sacrificial character of Mass, the Roman<br />

Canon, the so-called "Private Mass" and the application of Masses for the living and the<br />

dead.<br />

Alterations that <strong>Luther</strong> made to the Mass include:<br />

• Its translation in whole or in part into German (although he permitted most of the Mass to<br />

remain in Latin depending on the scruples of a given congregation, he always spoke the<br />

words of institution in German), and<br />

• The removal of the "long prayer of consecration that implied the mass reenacted the<br />

sacrifice of Jesus." (Hendrix 128, 129; elsewhere in the biography Hendrix mentions <strong>Luther</strong>'s<br />

distaste for the canon of the mass, to which he is likely referring with "long prayer" here.<br />

Clearly <strong>Luther</strong> retained the words of institution, albeit in German, but if I were to guess, he<br />

would have at least done away with the preface, the oblation, the epiclesis, and the<br />

intercessions [see anaphora]. Of course, if someone else knows more specifically what was<br />

changed, that would be good to know.)<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!