Making Films In Latvia - First Motion
Making Films In Latvia - First Motion
Making Films In Latvia - First Motion
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Līva Pētersone<br />
26<br />
<strong>Latvia</strong>n Documentary Cinema: the New Generation<br />
<strong>In</strong> <strong>Latvia</strong>n cinema, similar to national cinemas elsewhere, the term<br />
“documentary” has served various purposes. <strong>In</strong> the 1930s, newsreels and so-called<br />
“culture films” were, in part, manifestations of state ideology of the time, enhancing<br />
the nationalistic notions exerted by the newly-formed <strong>Latvia</strong>n free state.<br />
After the World War II, starting with the Soviet occupation – official and<br />
“parade films” - documentaries and newsreels defined by the guidelines of Socialist<br />
realism, bearing a little relevance to the term “documentary”, were the only modes of<br />
documentary cinema.<br />
<strong>In</strong> the 1960s, during the so-called thaw period of certain blossoming in social<br />
life and art, the movement of the Riga School of Poetic Documentary Cinema was<br />
characterized by a cinematographic change in vision (towards individualism) and<br />
quest for the cinematic/artistic poeticism in shooting ordinary people and quotidian<br />
life. The movement had a profound effect on the formal and ideological aspects of<br />
films of the later decades to come. <strong>In</strong> the late 1980s, director and cinematographer<br />
Juris Podnieks was one of the foremost figures to reveal the essence of the political<br />
and social friction of the society through intimate individual portraits.<br />
Presently, <strong>Latvia</strong>n documentary cinema is in a state of great diversity.<br />
Following the years of output mainly controlled at the state level, 20 years after the<br />
end of the Soviet rule, <strong>Latvia</strong>n filmmakers have come to define their very own, vastly<br />
varied, subject matter and cinematic language. The films produced in the recent years<br />
– and mainly by the relatively young generation of filmmakers – could be loosely<br />
described as adhering to several thematic groups. <strong>First</strong>, there are explorations of<br />
history, conflict, World War II, and ensuing trauma: films consisting mainly of<br />
archive footage compilations, present-day research on the subject and interviews,<br />
attempting to present a multi-lateral view on the controversial historical topics.<br />
Another, slightly different, is a body of films dealing with examinations of personal<br />
histories through an individual prism, focusing on a single or several characters to<br />
convey the ways collective history has altered (and vice-versa) personal histories. The<br />
third group involves a look at contemporary social issues in <strong>Latvia</strong>, jarring political<br />
conflicts, variously deprived individuals, etc. Next, there is a kind of “exotic stories”,