13.12.2012 Views

Making Films In Latvia - First Motion

Making Films In Latvia - First Motion

Making Films In Latvia - First Motion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Līva Pētersone<br />

26<br />

<strong>Latvia</strong>n Documentary Cinema: the New Generation<br />

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Latvia</strong>n cinema, similar to national cinemas elsewhere, the term<br />

“documentary” has served various purposes. <strong>In</strong> the 1930s, newsreels and so-called<br />

“culture films” were, in part, manifestations of state ideology of the time, enhancing<br />

the nationalistic notions exerted by the newly-formed <strong>Latvia</strong>n free state.<br />

After the World War II, starting with the Soviet occupation – official and<br />

“parade films” - documentaries and newsreels defined by the guidelines of Socialist<br />

realism, bearing a little relevance to the term “documentary”, were the only modes of<br />

documentary cinema.<br />

<strong>In</strong> the 1960s, during the so-called thaw period of certain blossoming in social<br />

life and art, the movement of the Riga School of Poetic Documentary Cinema was<br />

characterized by a cinematographic change in vision (towards individualism) and<br />

quest for the cinematic/artistic poeticism in shooting ordinary people and quotidian<br />

life. The movement had a profound effect on the formal and ideological aspects of<br />

films of the later decades to come. <strong>In</strong> the late 1980s, director and cinematographer<br />

Juris Podnieks was one of the foremost figures to reveal the essence of the political<br />

and social friction of the society through intimate individual portraits.<br />

Presently, <strong>Latvia</strong>n documentary cinema is in a state of great diversity.<br />

Following the years of output mainly controlled at the state level, 20 years after the<br />

end of the Soviet rule, <strong>Latvia</strong>n filmmakers have come to define their very own, vastly<br />

varied, subject matter and cinematic language. The films produced in the recent years<br />

– and mainly by the relatively young generation of filmmakers – could be loosely<br />

described as adhering to several thematic groups. <strong>First</strong>, there are explorations of<br />

history, conflict, World War II, and ensuing trauma: films consisting mainly of<br />

archive footage compilations, present-day research on the subject and interviews,<br />

attempting to present a multi-lateral view on the controversial historical topics.<br />

Another, slightly different, is a body of films dealing with examinations of personal<br />

histories through an individual prism, focusing on a single or several characters to<br />

convey the ways collective history has altered (and vice-versa) personal histories. The<br />

third group involves a look at contemporary social issues in <strong>Latvia</strong>, jarring political<br />

conflicts, variously deprived individuals, etc. Next, there is a kind of “exotic stories”,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!