Making Films In Latvia - First Motion
Making Films In Latvia - First Motion
Making Films In Latvia - First Motion
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
30<br />
Collective fate and sentiments of a generation are also explored in Antra<br />
Cilinska’s sequels to the Soviet Union smash-hit (seen at its time by millions)<br />
documentary Is it Easy to Be Young? (Vai viegli būt jaunam?, 1986, dir. Juris<br />
Podnieks), which, in a daring approach, revealed, through previously unseen candid<br />
interviews with several young people, the hopes and anxieties of the last Soviet<br />
generation. Is it Easy to Be...? (Vai viegli būt?, 1997), Is it Easy...? (Vai viegli...?,<br />
2010), revisit the persons interviewed in the first film after 10 and 20 years<br />
respectively, and in doing so, create a fairly accurate portrait of the social and<br />
economic changes <strong>Latvia</strong> and its society have gone through since the restoration of<br />
the independence in 1991. <strong>In</strong> its personal approach, the trilogy bears a striking<br />
resemblance, in its attempts to define the general by exploring the individual and the<br />
personal, to the famous The Up Series (1964 - 2012) by Michael Apted.<br />
The next group of films, and possibly the one which should be singled out<br />
most, can be characterized as a look at the contemporary situation in <strong>Latvia</strong>,<br />
especially though the prism of socially deprived individuals and jarring political<br />
conflicts.<br />
Andris Gauja is one of the most promising and scandalous young documentary<br />
filmmakers thanks to the controversial subject matter he chooses to portray in his<br />
films. His second documentary feature, Victor (Viktors, 2009) was a daring and<br />
poignant portrait of a dying man, offering a bleak and uncompromising look at the<br />
inevitable and not steering away from despair, anger, and pain associated with it. The<br />
following film, Family <strong>In</strong>stinct (Ăimenes lietas, 2010), went on to cause a major<br />
controversy at home and to be screened and awarded at international film festivals. It<br />
is not easy to define what is more shocking about the film – its subject or the way it is<br />
presented. A portrait of a closely-knit community in a rural <strong>Latvia</strong>n village, it is,<br />
essentially, a story about incest – the film’s protagonist is a young woman living with<br />
her brother, who has fathered their two children, - heavy substance abuse, moral<br />
degradation, social ineptness, even mental disabilities; however the element of fiction<br />
is jarring. It appears that although the original situation may not be far from what is<br />
seen on the screen, most of the dialogues, monologues, or pieces of action simply<br />
cannot be referred to as “documental”, as everything seems staged, re-played, and<br />
organized, the people portrayed acting as characters in a well-structured play. Thus<br />
the question really is that of the most controversial element here – are these the<br />
degraded subjects or they way they are exposed? <strong>In</strong> this sense, the film bears a