Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Finally, Finals!<br />
Thomas Morarre • Lolo, Montana<br />
Format and Function<br />
As I write this there are hurricanes and floods in Texas<br />
and Florida; forest fires in Montana, Idaho, Oregon,<br />
California, Washington and British Columbia; and<br />
heatwaves in much of the rest of the country. But in<br />
<strong>Nov</strong>ember as you are reading this, hopefully, all of these difficulties<br />
will be behind us and we will have completed another ASCA Finals<br />
competition. I find it a bit difficult to find a topic that is appropriate<br />
for the Finals Column at this time of the year. I have elected to<br />
present one idea that I heard recently concerning the format of finals<br />
and the possibility of improving the opportunity for our stockdogs<br />
to demonstrate their full range of capabilities.<br />
I was at a trial in August where the idea of adding Post<br />
Advanced and a Ranch trial to the finals agenda was discussed.<br />
The general opinion was that by including the additional trial<br />
formats, the competing dogs would demonstrate a more versatile<br />
and well-rounded set of skills than they can show in an arena trial.<br />
It was suggested that the additional types of trial would do more<br />
to promote the working Australian Shepherd. By raising the bar at<br />
Finals to include distance work and actual ranch tasks, it was felt<br />
that our Finals would become a better showcase for our dogs.<br />
I know that in the past Post Advanced has been used in Finals,<br />
but that was before my time and I am not sure how those Finals were<br />
conducted. The obvious issue that comes to mind when considering<br />
the addition of Post Advanced and/or Ranch trials to the Finals<br />
format and perhaps the one that is most difficult to address, would<br />
be finding a facility that could host Ranch Trials and Post Advanced<br />
trials as well as arena trials. There might also be an issue with stock<br />
as additional stock would be required. Then there is the issue of<br />
ducks. What do we do with ducks? But let’s set these issues aside<br />
for a moment and look at the proposal as I heard it discussed.<br />
In this proposal, the Finals competition would begin with a<br />
cattle and sheep Post Advanced trial. Then the arena trials would be<br />
held, and finally the Ranch trial would be held. The determination<br />
of the overall winners would be calculated by adding the combined<br />
scores from all events. This sort of high combined overall score<br />
would address the issue that seems to come up often in discussion<br />
of the quality of dogs at Finals. Namely, that many of the dogs<br />
that get into Finals do not represent the true working Aussie, but<br />
achieve their success because success in the arena courses that does<br />
not really test for the full working ability of our dogs.<br />
The proposed format would be quite time consuming and<br />
would require a couple of extra days to complete, but if the<br />
Post Advanced field were on the same site as the arenas for the<br />
regular advanced courses being run, then the two events could run<br />
simultaneously. I admit it would be a tight schedule. The ranch trial<br />
76 AUSSIE TIMES <strong>Nov</strong>ember-<strong>Dec</strong>ember <strong>2017</strong><br />
would probably have to be held on additional days and perhaps at<br />
a different location.<br />
To address the time requirements The Finals might need to<br />
be extended by a couple of days, maybe even to an entire week.<br />
It might also be necessary to have the number of competing dogs<br />
reduced to twenty. The logistics of a combined trial like this might<br />
make it unrealistic to include with Nationals. There would be many<br />
obstacles to overcome. But I have heard it suggested elsewhere<br />
that Stock Dog Finals be separated from Nationals. If Finals were<br />
extended to more than four days, I think making it a separate event<br />
might be necessary. In any case, the proposal I heard for including<br />
Post Advanced and Ranch Trial courses in Finals would have<br />
qualifying dogs competing in more diverse situations and really<br />
showing the ability of our dogs to perform different useful tasks.<br />
Our Aussies can do these things, so why shouldn’t we allow them<br />
to demonstrate their versatility?<br />
I have not tried to present a full blown description of how such<br />
a format could be implemented. In this column, I am only trying to<br />
sketch one idea for changing Finals to give folks something to think<br />
about and mull over. If you have comments on this idea or perhaps<br />
other ideas for improving the Stock Dog Finals, please send them<br />
to me and I will work them into future issues of the Aussie Times.<br />
ASCA Finals is supposed to be our signature event and demonstrate<br />
the capabilities of our Aussies. Is it currently doing that? If not,<br />
how can we modify the Stock Finals format to better showcase our<br />
dog’s working abilities?<br />
In the last issue one of our Mystery Pups was revealed. Donna<br />
Marsh and her Aussie, Tex, formally known as Mystery Pup<br />
Journey, were planning on going to Finals this year and competing<br />
in Sheep and Ducks. It was to be their first Finals. Although Donna<br />
will be sending me another contribution to comment on her firsttime<br />
Finals experience, I asked her if she would care to reflect on<br />
her thoughts preceding her trip to Bryan. She obliged me with a<br />
contribution that shines a light on the expense and effort it takes<br />
to make it into Finals that I am pleased to present here.<br />
****<br />
The Financial Road to Finals<br />
Prepared and submitted by Donna Marsh<br />
Tom suggested I write one more contribution describing my<br />
efforts to qualify for Finals. I wanted to share the expense of my<br />
journey to my first Finals in order to encourage more people to<br />
give it a shot. I believed that qualifying for Finals was out of the<br />
question for me because of the expense. But, as a regular Finalist<br />
once told me, “You don’t have to go to a lot of trials to qualify.